james444
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2004
- Posts
- 7,368
- Likes
- 2,820
good to know. the cable would be shorter tho right?
Yes, you lose about 10 cm (4 inch) of cable length by routing it over the ear.
good to know. the cable would be shorter tho right?
Yes, you lose about 10 cm (4 inch) of cable length by routing it over the ear.
Hmmm maybe the shure se535ltd is better for me. Although I can get the k3k for $600 from and authorized dealer, which make it tough to pay almost the same amount for an inferior headphone.![]()
Hmmm maybe the shure se535ltd is better for me. Although I can get the k3k for $600 from and authorized dealer, which make it tough to pay almost the same amount for an inferior headphone.![]()
I'm not an audiophile, but was thinking at that price range maybe I'm better off looking at open headphones for home use such as the audeze el-8 or grado ps500e. However I can see the convenience of in ears like the k3003 vs open. I was just hoping to find one headphone for my purposes rather than get into multiple. I may still pickup the k3003 and hope to be wowed since it seems like I can get my money back selling on here
Hmmm maybe the shure se535ltd is better for me. Although I can get the k3k for $600 from and authorized dealer, which make it tough to pay almost the same amount for an inferior headphone.![]()
The sure 535 isn't even in the same leauge as the k3. Had em both.
If you plan to use your IEMs first and foremost in noisy surroundings, you better include isolation as an evaluation criterion. Take a look at these measurements of noise attenuation for both the SE535 and K3003 (the lower the curve, the better):
(source: Innerfidelity headphone data sheets)
You can see that the AKGs have virtually zero isolation for low frequencies and slightly better, but still less isolation than the Shures in the midrange. You could probably improve that a bit by choosing deeper sealing tips, but no tips on earth will make the K3003 isolate like the SE535, because that's just not what they were designed for.
I love my K3003 in quiet surroundings, but I choose a pair of (modded) $40 AKG Y23 over them for commuting, because the latter sound fairly decent and isolate better.
Hi all, are there owners of both the MDR-EX1000 and K3003 here? Unfortunately the Head-Fi search function is rather unwieldy so I'm wondering if those that do have shared any comparisons? I've had the EX1000 for a long time now and am looking for something that improves on it. In particular, I sometimes find the treble on the EX1000 to have an unnatural metallic tinge. Does the K3003 do better in this regard? Oh, and any suggestions for other IEMs that I should consider are welcome!
you got to try K3003 then![]()
Also, It was recommended that I check out Dita. Any thoughts if that would be a better headphone for isolation? It's a lot more money at the cost I can get the k3k so not sure if it's worth it.
If you plan to use your IEMs first and foremost in noisy surroundings, you better include isolation as an evaluation criterion. Take a look at these measurements of noise attenuation for both the SE535 and K3003 (the lower the curve, the better):
(source: Innerfidelity headphone data sheets)
You can see that the AKGs have virtually zero isolation for low frequencies and slightly better, but still less isolation than the Shures in the midrange. You could probably improve that a bit by choosing deeper sealing tips, but no tips on earth will make the K3003 isolate like the SE535, because that's just not what they were designed for.
I love my K3003 in quiet surroundings, but I choose a pair of (modded) $40 AKG Y23 over them for commuting, because the latter sound fairly decent and isolate better.