A bit disappointed with M50's
post-7585289
Thread Starter
Post #1 of 22

Bartmasta

New Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 30, 2010
Messages
31
Reaction score
10
Joined
Nov 30, 2010
Posts
31
Likes
10
My M50's arrived today, been listening to some music. I think I only burned them in for 4 hours but so far:
 
Some songs sound mind blowing, but then again some songs sound worse than my 201's which is really disappointed. I listen to electronic music 95% of the time, which is what these headphones are recommended for, but they are really lacking for vocal trance. Like you don't get chills down your spine with some of the vocals from trance songs. The vocals just seem a bit dimmed down, and this really bothers me.
 
Help?
 
Thanks in advance.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7585300
Post #2 of 22

alv4426

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
2,166
Reaction score
68
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
2,166
Likes
68
Your ears, it must be your ears theyre broken. jk jk... Yea I get what youre saying but I didnt really get it until I heard something better so kudos to you. You could try to get an amp or use an eq. 
 
     Share This Post       
post-7585328
Post #3 of 22

joey99

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
322
Reaction score
48
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Posts
322
Likes
48
I have my M50 running through a FiioE7/E9 combo and with a tiny mid/upper mid adjustment in the EQ of Foobar brings the vocals up really nicely. I find my M50 really lively and love them even more than my DT880s for vocals.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7585339
Post #4 of 22

BotByte

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
2,256
Reaction score
52
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Posts
2,256
Likes
52
1. The highs that hit you, are crackling. The right amount of highs should warm and move into you, not hit you.
 
2. 40 hours, then decide
 
3. EQ, try Foobar2000, it has great EQ settings
 
     Share This Post       
post-7585373
Post #5 of 22

nick n

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
5,253
Reaction score
1,178
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Posts
5,253
Likes
1,178
are they a real pair?  Where did you get them from?
 
     Share This Post       
post-7585479
Post #6 of 22

crinacle

Member of the Trade: In-Ear Fidelity
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
2,365
Reaction score
3,024
Location
SG
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Location
SG
Posts
2,365
Likes
3,024
Website
crinacle.com
 
Quote:
My M50's arrived today, been listening to some music. I think I only burned them in for 4 hours but so far:
 
Some songs sound mind blowing, but then again some songs sound worse than my 201's which is really disappointed. I listen to electronic music 95% of the time, which is what these headphones are recommended for, but they are really lacking for vocal trance. Like you don't get chills down your spine with some of the vocals from trance songs. The vocals just seem a bit dimmed down, and this really bothers me.
 
Help?
 
Thanks in advance.

The M50s are all rounders. Not specialists. Whoever told you that Electronic is the M50's forte is probably shooting off his behind for that one. You should've gotten the HFI-580 for that genre, but since you bought the next best thing, enjoy it :)
 
Vocals though, they're more toward a "natural female" subgenre. Electronized (lol, is that a real word? XD) vocals don't really sound good on the M50, at least for me.
 
 
     Share This Post       
post-7585503
Post #7 of 22

TrantaLocked

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
309
Reaction score
20
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Posts
309
Likes
20
I know what you mean. The HD 201s have a very high level of treble, which I think makes voices sound amazing when the song isn't too complicated. 
 
     Share This Post       
post-7585684
Post #8 of 22

MalVeauX

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
7,000
Reaction score
714
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Posts
7,000
Likes
714


Quote:
My M50's arrived today, been listening to some music. I think I only burned them in for 4 hours but so far:
 
Some songs sound mind blowing, but then again some songs sound worse than my 201's which is really disappointed. I listen to electronic music 95% of the time, which is what these headphones are recommended for, but they are really lacking for vocal trance. Like you don't get chills down your spine with some of the vocals from trance songs. The vocals just seem a bit dimmed down, and this really bothers me.
 
Help?
 
Thanks in advance.

Heya,
 
Recommended by who?
 
M50's only excel at one thing--they deliver decent performance and quality across the spectrum for their cost. They're not some god-send headphone for any genre.
 
Where'd you buy them? Got a return policy? Use it. Get something else. Don't even wait for the burn in. They're not going to change in some significant way that's going to change your mind on this.
 
Very best,
 
     Share This Post       
post-7585839
Post #9 of 22

ucdavisboy

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
17
Reaction score
10
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Posts
17
Likes
10
This is coming from someone who has burned a pair in from hour 1 to now about 300 hours and these are my observations:
 
1) Burn in changes the characteristics of these A LOT. You know those recessed mids (i.e. the vocals) so many talk about? Well to MY ears, those come forward between 80-100 hours on my pair and at 100 hours plus everything seems to just sound a bit better. Honestly....at this point the mids are not recessed....I think they are where they should be and if I fiddle with my EQ I can pull them forward.
 
2) As noted, these are good all rounders for the price (especially if you can grab a nice pair for a steal like I did-under $100). Now....I've listened to quite a few models in the all the way up to the $300 retail mark and I feel that for my music (which is HIGHLY DIVERSE from classical to heavy metal and everything in between) they are the perfect unit because they are able to handle every genre fairly well.
 
3) Your source material and what you're piping it through makes a HUGE difference. I'm running my M50 through a JDS Labs cMoy using a 5th Gen iPod Video and LOD and that is what is required to make the M50 shine. Without an amp (especially through the headphone jack) the dropoff in quality is pretty noticable. Also-got to have low compressed MP3's (if that's what you're using)-the difference between 160 and 256 is suddenly really apparent....256 to 320 hmmm...not so much to me but I think my ears are halfway to tin.
 
As others have noted....give them at least 40 hours and 100 hours plus IMO and take what I have laid out above into consideration.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7585941
Post #10 of 22

Beagle

His body's not a canvas, and he wasn't raised by apes.
Joined
Jun 29, 2001
Messages
8,527
Reaction score
2,272
Joined
Jun 29, 2001
Posts
8,527
Likes
2,272
I slapped the spare pair of Shure SRH940 velour pads on my M50 and it transformed them. No more sunken mids and no more bloated fuzzy midbass.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7585949
Post #11 of 22

Acix

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
6,485
Reaction score
70
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Posts
6,485
Likes
70
If you dont like the M-50, you can just move to some nice Ultrasones for a better vocals and sound stage. I just saw PL-650 on the FS forum for $100.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7586003
Post #12 of 22

kenshin27

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
May 24, 2011
Messages
164
Reaction score
17
Joined
May 24, 2011
Posts
164
Likes
17
Really, I may have to give this a shot.
 
Quote:
I slapped the spare pair of Shure SRH940 velour pads on my M50 and it transformed them. No more sunken mids and no more bloated fuzzy midbass.


 
 
     Share This Post       
post-7586016
Post #13 of 22

jerg

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
6,104
Reaction score
803
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Posts
6,104
Likes
803
Simple answer? EQing. M50 responds tastefully to EQing.
 
Just crank up 20 hz to 1k hz region evenly up by 4~5 dB, and observe how everything sweetens up.
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Borgbox
post-7586154
Post #14 of 22

ucdavisboy

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
17
Reaction score
10
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Posts
17
Likes
10


Quote:
Really, I may have to give this a shot.
 


 


Does this increase sound leakage?????
 


Quote:
I slapped the spare pair of Shure SRH940 velour pads on my M50 and it transformed them. No more sunken mids and no more bloated fuzzy midbass.


 
 
     Share This Post       
post-7586239
Post #15 of 22

Armaegis

Modern Modder Man of Manitoba
HTML... uphill, both ways!
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
12,213
Reaction score
1,145
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Posts
12,213
Likes
1,145


Quote:
Simple answer? EQing. M50 responds tastefully to EQing.
 
Just crank up 20 hz to 1k hz region evenly up by 4~5 dB, and observe how everything sweetens up.
 
I assume you meant 200 Hz and not 20 Hz there. He wants to bring up the vocals a bit, not drown them with bass.
 
 
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top