Simgot EW200

General Information

ew200.jpg

Latest reviews

InfiniteJester

New Head-Fier
The most affordable excellence.
Pros: Clear. Accurate. Effortless.
Good soundstage.
Almost perfect timbre.
Aesthetically pleasing.
Comfortable.
Cons: Needs the most tiny touch of EQ to become truly remarkable.
Driver flex with some (non-custom) tips.
Introduction:
In the realm of audiophilia—a pursuit often driven by the allure of new technology, unique aesthetics, and the thrill of the novel—finding a piece of equipment that marries classic excellence with affordability can seem quixotic. As I delved into the exploration of IEMs, my criteria were stringent: uncover the finest auditory experience at the lowest conceivable price point. After testing an extensive array of budget-friendly models touted across various platforms, the EW200s have triumphantly ended my search.

Personal Bias:
I approach reviews with a philosophy rooted in appreciation; I choose to evaluate products that resonate with me; because, as an artist, I recognize the immense challenge inherent in creation. My focus is on constructive critique and celebrating innovation and excellence. I will only review products that I enjoy.

Pros:
1. Clarity and Precision: The EW200s offer an impeccable audio clarity that makes each note distinct and vibrant, ensuring an effortless listening experience. Every instrument sounds as it should; you won't hear plastic winds or bloomy pianos with this set, as you would with other cheap products.
2. Soundstage: They project a good soundstage that extends beyond the confines of one's cranial boundaries, a rare feat in this price bracket. It is not an extraordinary soundstage, and the image has a minor tendency to divide into three blobs; still, it surpases the competition with ease, although it cannot compete with more expensive models.
3. Timbre: The timbre of the EW200s is nearly flawless, capturing the true essence and color of instruments with astonishing accuracy. The sparkle is a little bit accentuated, nonetheless; without EQ, they are not completely devoid of certain tendency to sibilance with bright music.
4. Aesthetics: These IEMs are not only sonically pleasing but also visually appealing, boasting a design that is both elegant and understated. It is kind of sad that my own pic doesn't make them justice.
5. Comfort: With their ergonomic design, the EW200s provide comfort that allows for prolonged use without discomfort, making them ideal for extensive listening sessions.
6. Layering and separation: Really good for a single dynamic driver. But, in my opinion, still behind what (much more expensive) good hybrids and planars can achieve.

Cons:
1. Equalization: To unlock their full potential, the EW200s benefit from a slight equalization adjustment. This minor tweak elevates their performance from excellent to extraordinary. I prefer USoundV1V over HarmanIE2019v2, this set follows more closely the second than the first.
2. Driver Flex: Some users may experience driver flex when using certain ear tips, which, while not detrimental to the sound quality, can be a minor inconvenience.

Conclusion:
Priced at just €31.40, the EW200s stand uncontested in the budget IEM market. They shatter the conventional compromise between cost and quality, offering a high-fidelity experience without the expected sacrifices. Unlike other budget options, which often force listeners to endure a narrowed soundstage, artificial timbres, and noticeable distortion, the EW200s maintain a level of performance that challenges these norms.

In a market flooded with transient trends and ephemeral offerings, the EW200s distinguish themselves as an atemporal classic, capable of delivering a pure and expansive sonic experience that will satisfy both seasoned audiophiles and newcomers to the audio scene. Whether you seek the ideal entry point into high-quality audio or wish to expand an already robust collection, the EW200s deserve your consideration.

Imagen de WhatsApp 2024-04-07 a las 18.22.07_baa4137b.jpg


Post scriptum:
I would like to add my EQ profile to give something to the community. As stated, it has been designed to make the tuning of the set more in line with the USoundV1V target. I have left the upper treble mostly unaltered, given the low reliability of measurements at higher frequencies. This profile makes, in my opinion, the bass more impactful, the whole set more relaxed and the soundstage more cohesive. For my personal preference, this profile refines and elevates the EW200s enough to make them almost flawless.

With EQ, they are a 4,5 star set.

Preamp: -3.7 dB
Filter 1: ON PK Fc 20 Hz Gain 1.7 dB Q 1.000
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 86 Hz Gain 3.1 dB Q 0.500
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 700 Hz Gain 1.8 dB Q 1.000
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 1400 Hz Gain -1.5 dB Q 2.000
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 2200 Hz Gain -1.7 dB Q 1.000
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 5000 Hz Gain -3.1 dB Q 2.000
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 6600 Hz Gain 6.8 dB Q 2.000
Filter 8: ON PK Fc 8100 Hz Gain -9.5 dB Q 2.000
Filter 9: ON PK Fc 10000 Hz Gain 6.8 dB Q 2.000
Last edited:

therollo9

New Head-Fier
Simgot EW200 Review | The Puzzling Option at $40
Pros: Tuned to Harman IE with more warmth. It's a pretty "Safe" tonality
Surprising bass dynamics for the price
Relatively airy set, giving a pretty wide perception of stage for my ears
Comfortable and sleek shell
Well-made cable for the price
Cons: Can be too shouty, resulting in vocals coming across too "in-your-head"
Can still sound very lean in terms of male vocal warmth and body
Female vocals can have an extra texture depending on songs
Stock eartips are ordinary

Here's a review video if you prefer to watch​


Introduction​

vlcsnap-2024-03-20-20h42m53s210.png

Back in November HiFi 2023 in the Philippines, I had an opportunity to try out the entirety of the Simgot lineup aside from the EW100P, EW100P DSP, and the older Simgot IEMs, and for the most part, I have a very good impression of them. However, I also want to compare one of them in my living space for at least two weeks, so when Simgot reached out to me for a review tour unit for the Simgot EW200, I obliged. Now that I had them for some time now, I want to share my own thoughts.

Disclaimer: As stated, this unit was sent over by Simgot; however, they have neither seen this written review nor the review video before publication, and all of the statements are my own.

Build, Design, and Comfort​

vlcsnap-2024-03-04-11h29m07s415.png

The Simgot EW200 features a fairly minimalist design with a glossy steel finish and a monochromatic logo at the faceplate. It is paired with a white cable with some yellow accents in the form of the yellow inner wire. The build quality is superb for its price. The metal shell feels very substantial and weighty and the cable is soft-feeling without having some form of microphonics. The provided eartips could’ve been better but it’s nothing to complain about for the price. Fit is similar to the usual “single DD shell” which is to say that it is fairly secure when worn on my ears.

Subjective Sound​

This is a well-tuned set with a very upfront focus on vocals. This is a good fit for people who want a more center-stage or intimate vocal presentation, specifically on the female vocals, as in some songs, female vocals can have a very "breathy" character.

What surprised me about the EW200 is its bass performance. It has a solid punch for a more bright-leaning set in its price point, so when I was testing some of my rock or pop playlists, I can still feel the definition of the kick drum.

However, the midrange, and maybe the lower treble, causes issues for me. This is, no doubt, too forward in the vocals for my tastes. Don't get me wrong though. I can enjoy a very intimate presentation, but the EW200 can cause a bit of a narrow center stage, which bothers me a lot. Instrumentals don't give me the same issue, though, but it depends on how the guitar is mixed. It also doesn't help that the bass is still quite lean despite its impressive performance regarding its punch and slam.

As for the treble, it's relatively fine. I never found the cymbals to have a metallic sheen, nor did they feel blunt although, depending on how treble-sensitive you are, the cymbals can still sound too strong or harsh, similar to the drummer hitting the cymbals too hard. There's also the "breathy" character on female vocals which can be pretty intense if you prioritize a smoother vocal presentation. The air region felt fine for me. It's relatively airy, giving a more spacious perception of stage width.

Other things to note:
  • Imaging is less 3-blob-y compared to the lower price bracket. However, the center image sometimes gets too strong (the too-forward vocal presentation are to blame)
  • Timbre is decent. It doesn't sound weird in one instrument or another, but it's not pretty "realistic" or anything. For some people, though, this might be a downgrade depending on which IEM they are coming from.
  • Resolution is quite good. I'm getting more texture out of the instruments more clearly when compared to the lower price bracket.

Objective Sound​

Here is my graphtool. I publish graphs measured with a clone IEC60318-4 (IEC711) coupler I bought from Sounds Good Store in AliExpress.
graph 1.png

A few points of focus here:
  • There's much more presence from 2kHz to 3kHz compared to what I perceive as neutral. This is why I'm hearing more vocals compared to the instruments in the band. Combined with the relative lack of lower mids, it will come across as very shouty when you try to compensate for the lack of lower mids. It's a big contrast or distance between the lower mids and the upper mids.
  • The elevation from 4kHz to 6kHz can relate to some harmonics of the female vocals, which is probably why I'm hearing a more "breathy" character on them. It depends on the person if they want this characteristic or not. It's similar to the Hana 2021's vocal presentation in a way.

Comparisons​

vs. Truthear x crinacle Zero​

graph 1.png

  • They’re similar in terms of the overall sound signature, but the Truthear Zero has a more elevated bass response, so that the bass feels bouncier and fun. Still both relatively thin in its lower mids, but you may favor the Truthear Zero if you listen to EDM more often.
  • Truthear Zero has slightly more precise imaging, but is compromised by the elevated upper mids like the EW200.
Ultimately, the EW200 has less faults in its technical performance, is comfier, and it’s $10 USD cheaper anyway.

vs. Truthear x crinacle Zero:Red​

graph 1.png

I always favored the Truthear Zero:Red over any IEMs in the price range its at, and it’s also the case here when comparing against the Simgot EW200. Notably:
  • Zero:Red is simply more natural or smoother sounding. It may lack warmth for some people, but due to a more relaxed upper midrange presentation, it gives a more appropriate reproduction of vocals in my opinion.
  • Zero:Red is more precise in its imaging. I tend to notice the separation of each parts of the drum a bit clearer despite its relatively cramped stage width.

vs 7Hz Salnotes x crinacle Zero:2​

graph 1.png

  • Not as technically impressive as the Simgot EW200. It’s less airy, and imaging is a bit cluttered in some cases.
  • However, I find the Zero:2 to be simply more engaging due to its safer tonality in the mids and treble, and the extra bass presence is very welcoming, especially for new people who are coming from sets that are probably too much bass to begin with, so it’s an easier transition, or they’re just bassheads.

Let's Wrap This Up.​

vlcsnap-2024-03-04-12h48m37s269.png

I think the Simgot EW200 has a spot in the market. It is a vocal-forward set with impressive technical performance for the price. This is for people who wants their music to have a more upfront or intimate vocal presentation without somehow missing the presence of the instruments of the band. It relatively more refined sense of air compared to some IEMs at the lower price bracket. For me, though, it’s not what I prefer. My EQ profile for this set, if I have to make one, is essentially decreasing the upper mids since I’m picky on that region for the most part. It’s a solid IEM, but it’s not for me.
  • Like
Reactions: Colin5619

briantbrain

New Head-Fier
Is it still relevant after almost a year on Chi-Fi entry-level wave?
Pros: - Good IEM shell
- Comfortable fitting for the majority of ears
- Neutral to bright tonal with good presentation in its price range
- Very good and natural bass
- Sweet, forward, and not dry mid
- Treble spike loved by treble lovers
- Suitable for all genre songs
Cons: - One of the worst out-of-the-box eartips
- Entry-level IEM cable quality, not great
- Treble spike not for everyone
- Treble presentation slightly stacked, not sparkling and abruptly cut off
- Imaging of the treble part is not very good
- Look for suitable eartips for better fit
- Not for treble heads and bass heads


I'm actually a bit puzzled as to why Simgot is offering the EW200, which was released almost a year ago, for review. Many call it a "fried" IEM, but surprisingly it's quite popular, which got me, who was initially a bit lazy to review, curious too.

After finding suitable eartips and trying them out, BOY... OH BOYY!!, it turns out that in the 500k Rupiah price range, there's also a good IEM and might even become a benchmark for entry-level audiophile friends who are just starting to get interested. A bit late, but here it is, the Simgot EW200. Let's dive in.

86e038a0-5b8c-416f-b741-cb6147019c18.jpg
---

**DISCLAIMER**​


All my impressions and reviews are subjective and follow the belief of "only my savings are the ones I deceive, reviews must be honest." Agree? Alright. Disagree? Alright. Because I review because I want to and like it, not because I need to, haha.
  • "But you say this because Simgot gave it to you and paid you, right?" Oh no, definitely not. I'm a true audiophile hobbyist who will always be honest without bias. Don't believe it? Read until the end, we'll dissect the pros and cons.
  • "But you're saying this because it's new, probably just during the 'honeymoon' phase?" In this hobby, which is truly "dark and full of toxins," it will always be like this until the end of the world. Human desire has no end, wkwkwkw.
  • "But it's better to listen and enjoy it, right?" You got it right.

Important!! I suggest you still audition it yourself, maybe my ears need an ENT doctor or maybe you need one (hahha).
---

**FOR WHO IS THIS POST FOR?**​

  • Cheap IEMs suitable for new audiophiles?
  • Neutral to bright IEMs that are affordable?
  • What is the Simgot EW200?
  • Who is the Simgot EW200 for?
  • Just want to read the review?
---

**SOUND SOUGHT**​

  • Crispy treble with a bit of spice
  • Good quality and quantity bass, but not for bass heads
  • Technicality, imaging, and clarity are top-notch
  • Wide soundstage
---

**TESTED WITH**​

- Youtube Music
- Tidal
- Hiby M300
- Fiio Q15
- Lenovo Office Laptop (What series?)
- Simgot EW200
---

**UNBOXING**​

What do you expect from an IEM priced under $40? Don't expect too much, as long as the packaging is safe and neat so it doesn't get damaged during shipping, that's good enough. But in my opinion, Simgot is quite good at providing a clean and slightly labyrinthine design packaging.

10dff9bd-bdee-4f3d-a694-3cd680425678.jpg

What's inside? Well, here it is:
- The IEM itself
- 2-braid cable (By God, this cable is so bad!! Like a 0.5 cent aquarium hose!! And it's sticky like it's covered in rice!! Damn, I can't stand it...)
- Bag/sleeve
- 3 sets of eartips in different sizes (the eartips are unclearly genuine. For some reason, the sizes S, M, L seem too small, maybe these are SS, S, SM, and the material is, God... well, like a cheap plastic silicone casing for handphone)
- User manual
---

**FITTING**​

Note: My earholes are quite big and almost all IEMs can fit and sit nicely. Oh, I always use size L eartips.
This IEM is made of metal, very shiny. On one hand, it looks really cool, but on the other hand, if there are scratches, it will be very noticeable.
Moreover, this IEM is quite small and I'm sure it will fit into everyone's ears. The only downside is that my ear holes are very big, so even with the size L Spinfit W1 eartips that I usually use, it's not completely sealed unless I push really hard until my eardrums hurt, hahaha.
Why not use the included eartips? The eartips are trash, just throw them away, in my opinion.

6576adc6-67e9-42f2-ab2e-12eacea4bdfc.jpg

---

**SOUND IMPRESSION**​

**Bass:**
The first time I heard it, I felt that the bass produced is good and coherent with the mids and trebles. I only realized later that it's a single DD, so it's no wonder that the sound is coherent with the slightly rumbling bass.
The bass speed produced is not too fast but not slow either, with a decent rumble tail, in my opinion, it's quite good for its price range. The kick drum impact feels quite deep and doesn't make the ears hurt for non-bassheads.
Its weakness might be that although the bass produced is of good quality, it still feels lacking in richness compared to TOTL IEMs like the Symphonium Crimson that I usually use (well, in terms of price, it's 1/48 of the Crimson). However, it can be said that this is good bass in its price range.

**Mid:**
Now, this is one of the main selling points of this IEM in my opinion. The mids are good, tidy, and melodious. The voices of men and women sound sweet and not dry, with a suitable presentation, not airy and not thick either. I'm sure vocal lovers will enjoy listening to this IEM, especially with its slightly forward presentation.
It's a bit difficult to write down its drawbacks at this price. Overall, it's good.

**Treble:**
For those not sensitive to treble, I think they will definitely like the treble of this IEM. How not? The treble is presented well, complete, and clear. Although from the upper mid to the treble, it will feel a bit spiked, but I think it can be tuned with suitable eartips.
However, it's a shame that the sparkling and crispy impression is not obtained. Besides feeling abruptly cut off, its presentation is also less than optimal because not all micro details are presented. Perhaps this is a weakness of a Single DD IEM in this price range.

**Clarity, Imaging, and Soundstage:**
- Clarity: Clear, distinct, but not the IEM expected to have micro details. Fortunately, this IEM won't sound sibilant or shouty, which is disturbing.
- Imaging: Separation and 3D imaging are perceived to be quite good, but due to the lack of micro details and the treble that's abruptly cut off, it feels like many aspects in the high range are covered by other aspects.
- Soundstage: Average, neither too wide nor too narrow. No other description is more appropriate than average, hehe.

**Specs:**
- Driver: 10mm dual-magnetic circuit & dual-cavity SPC dynamic driver
- Diaphragm: Double-sided vapor-deposited silicon crystal diaphragm
- Impedance: 16 ohms +-15% (@ 1kHz)
- Sensitivity: 126dB/Vrms (@ 1kHz)
- Frequency Range: 10Hz–50kHz
- Frequency Response: 20Hz-20kHz
- Connector: 0.78mm
- Cable: High-purity silver-plated OFC cable

This IEM is very lightweight and can be easily carried around with a small HP or DAP like the M300.
---

**SO?**​

  • Relevant? Not all technology has to be the most up-to-date, especially in this subjective hobby. Sometimes IEMs that were released a year ago can still be used as benchmarks for newly released IEMs.
  • Can't expect much from accessories in this price range, but I really hate the accessories because they're so bad wkwkw.
  • IEM with neutral to bright tonal.
  • I would recommend this IEM for Entry Level audiophiles who are hesitant to dive into this hobby but have a tight budget and are afraid of buying IEMs at the same price and getting disappointed.

That's all.
Trust your ears.
Bye.

Attachments

  • 444eff57-c57d-4fb7-87a6-ea7fb3d90880.jpg
    444eff57-c57d-4fb7-87a6-ea7fb3d90880.jpg
    224.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: Colin5619

Comments

There are no comments to display.
Back
Top