Reviews by Oeufdepoire

Oeufdepoire

Head-Fier
Pros: Very light and flexible detachable cable, 3,5 mm jack with adapter, makes you attend a private representation, very comfortable
Cons: Needs an amp, clamp hard
 
[size=11pt]I will compare them to the Grado SR80i with both S and L cushes, and to the Shure SE215.[/size]
 
[size=11pt]You don't need super-quality equipment to turn the HD600 into an instrument of bliss. My setup is composed of a GrubDAC and a Millet « Starving student » hybrid amp (12AU7 version), built with good components (Wima & Panasonic FM caps on the signal path, stock Philips ones for the power supply, JAN Philips 12AU7 tubes) but not the best (Mundorf caps, expensive Mullard tubes or silver wiring), and powered by a LM317-based power supply build by my father with stock components (it's not an excellent PSU like a σ11).[/size]
[size=11pt]I just want you not to think what I thought before : « Aw with my sub-standard equipment I won't be able to enjoy such a good pair of headphones. » That's not true. Maybe you never thought that, it's only me who's a little paranoid, but here. I wanted you to know.[/size]
 
[size=11pt]I used to enjoy music in a somewhat « mystic » way : sounds comes from nothing, they are just sound, pure sound. For example, knowing anything « extra-sonic », like the names of a band's members, the year, &c, ALTERAIT my enjoyment of the music, because it made me constantly aware that it was only a recording of sounds produced by humans. That was with the Grado and Shure.[/size]
[size=11pt]With the HD600, I can't listen to music in this « nothing-but-pure-sound » way. For the best.[/size]
[size=11pt]The HD600 gives too much substance, reality and texture to the instruments' sound to allow me not to visualize the instruments being played. I can't hear a cello without feeling the bow rubbing on the strings. Everything sounds more real through them. This illlusion is perfected by all the details the headphones bring out the player's breathing, the fingers' touch on the cello, the unexact attack of the ARCHET on the string... And they do present soundstage, contrary to the SR80i and the SE215 – I thought these presented soundstage, but compared to the HD600, it can not be called « soundstage ». The illusion of reality is without comparison with the Grado SR80i or the Shure SE215 (I know, it's not the same price range and all, but still... for those who would like to compare). Listening to music with HD600 is attending a private representation whereas with the two other headphones, it's like of a projection on a screen, still with details, but it sounds flatter.[/size]
 
[size=11pt]It seems there is an optimal volume to find, a precise point at which the voices or the sounds are just loud enough to bring out all their details, but no too much so that the sources doesn't seem too close from the listener. (The recording must SE PRETER A this though.) The illusion of presence is so strong it pulls tears from my eyes... Listening to Yo-Yo Ma's interpretation of Bach's Suites for unaccompanied cello in these "circumstances" is an amazing experience.[/size]
[size=11pt]So far, I find the HD600 more excellent for classical trios or smaller formations more than for anything else.[/size]
 
 
Pics of the unboxing :
 
Unboxing09_1024x683.jpgUnboxing10_1024x683.jpgUnboxing11_1024x683.jpg
Unboxing12_1024x683.jpgUnboxing13_1024x683.jpgUnboxing14_1024x683.jpg
Unboxing15_1024x683.jpgUnboxing16_1024x683.jpgUnboxing18_1024x683.jpg

 

Oeufdepoire

Head-Fier
Pros: Very flexible cable, very comfortable pads
Cons: Y-cable, don't isolate well, pads get sweaty pretty quickly, uncomfortable headband
I've listened to them about half an hour.
 
They are sold as extra bassy, and so they are, indeed.
  • Like
Reactions: jb2unique
reddragon
reddragon
well undetachable cable is expected at this price range, mids and highs overwhelmed by bass is also expected for an "extra bass" headphone that costs 50 dollars, too much bass? well its extra bass series, so that is also expected. take those away, not that many cons at all...
Oeufdepoire
Oeufdepoire
I would have expected an unilateral cable, even at this price range.
I'm taking away the cons about the sound, you're right, I'm expectinf too much from a set of $50 headphones.

Oeufdepoire

Head-Fier
Pros: Wonderful look (IMO), detachable cable
Cons: Not worth the price at all, bad sound quality, boomy bass, the earcups don't rotate enough
Work in progress​
 
A friend of my brother came with his Beats Solo's, and he pleasantly accepted to lend them to me, for me to give them a try. Finally, I was able to hear by myself Head-Fi'ers' nemesis.
 
Briefly :​
I consider them worse than my late AKG K 450's, that were worth the third of the Beats.
 
In my opinion, they look perfect. I don't know if they are particulary fragile, I don't have had them for long enough.
 
The earcups don't rotate enough, so they press against the backside of my ears, and it's uncomfortable. They clamp a bit hard. My SR80i's feel very ligh and comfortable in comparison. The pads of the Solo's are very comfortable themsleves though.
 
First thing I noticed : boxy sound.
I should have expected this, as they are closed-back headphones. It was the same thing as with my set of AKG K 450. First bad point, even if it's appliable to every closed-back headphones (or maybe not?).
 
The bass is boomy. Boom, boom, boom. It's unpleasant. Compared to the SE215's, whose bass are like bullets in a piece of wood, hitting firmly and precisely, the Solo's bass sound like a deflated socer balloon thrown at high speed into your face.
 
Guitars from metal music don't sound good on those. They don't have the abrasive, grainy, sandy texture they should have. They sound worse than on the SE215's, and poor compared to the SR80i's.
 
Pics :
 
961430407LL.jpg2025983572LL.jpg1362619848LL.jpg1057526931LL.jpg271004183LL.jpg820414995LL.jpg
  • Like
Reactions: Metafalls
thecansmancan
thecansmancan
For another review check this out.
autoteleology
autoteleology
"the Solo's bass sound like a deflated socer balloon thrown at high speed into your face."

I loled.

Oeufdepoire

Head-Fier
Pros: Isolation, comfort, sturdiness, sound
Cons: Soft case, connections oxidize and this causes sound to cut
Everything written here is totally subjective.​
Review updated a year and half after purchasing the IEMs.​
 ​
IMPORTANT :
THE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE CORD AND THE EARPHONES ARE NOT GOLD-PLATED,
THEY'RE MADE OF COPPER.
THEY OXIDIZE, AND THIS MAY CAUSE SOUND TO CUT.
DEOXYDIZE ONCE IN A WHILE WITH A PAINTBRUSH.
 ​
I'm reviewing the clear version,​
but it doesn't change anything, excepted than my review is more visible here​
(by the way, the clear and black version of these IEM should be put together into one "SE215" category).​
 
- They isolate very well with foam sleeves. Be careful when wearing them in town, look around you, they prevent you from hearing the cars.
- Over-the-ear wearing makes them keeping in place very well.
- Comfort with silicon tips is perfect. Really.
- Memory cable is practical.
- They look very, very nice. Even the cable is nice-looking.
- Detachable cable can be handy (even if it's not useful to me).
- They are very surdy.
 
- Foam tips isolate more than olives, but are less comfortable.
 
- Demands time to get used to and to find the right tips.
- The cable is a little stiff.
 
SOUND
- The sound isn't boxy as it is with closed-back headphones. It's nearly as airy as on my Grado's, excepted than the seal gives a little impression of closedness.
- Highs don't sound bad at all, as I could read on many reviews.
- Bass are gorgeous.
- They seem to profit very much from the use of my AD823-based CMoy, but maybe it's only a placebo effect. Anyway, even if it all came from the placebo effect, building said CMoy was the right thing to do. Drums sound better, and soundstage sounds a little wider.
 
Pics (enlargeable) :
 
900x900px-LL-c2ac981a_Packaging.jpg960358405LL.jpg900x900px-LL-d3546053_Sleevesearphones.jpg793916728LL.jpg173339213LL.jpg1644331290LL.jpg900x900px-LL-64f6469e_Earphoneplug.jpg900x900px-LL-7ab45c21_Jack.jpg1521181811LL.jpg1632375447LL.jpg

Oeufdepoire

Head-Fier
Pros: Tiny, extendable memory, rockboxable, handful clip, reads FLAC, dynamic playlists, astonishing price/functionnality ratio
I bought this DAP for $50, along with a 16-GB micro SD card that cost me $17. So I've got a total capacity of 18,4 GB in a DAP which is 5,5 cm long, 3,5 cm wide and 1,5 cm thick for a total of $67. Less than the third of the price of an iPod nano that has less than 16 GB of memory.
 
It does everything I expect a DAP to do : it can sort tracks by folder in addition of all other ways, it allows dynamic playlists, it can play FLAC files (even if I never use this feature), and many other. All you can wish, I guess. The only things I miss don't even come from the DAP itself, but from Rockbox : to me, it lacks a "stop after current" function, as in foobar2000, and a "clear playlist" function.
 
I rockboxed it immediately after having receiving it. Rockbox adds some useful and other funny features, like radio recording and some games like Sokoban and chess.
 
The writing speed in the Sansa's memory is around 2.70 MBps.
 
I can use it for between 12 and 13 hours before having to charge it.
 
I've never used it with the default interface, it has been Rockboxed the minute I opened the package. The interface is extremely intuitive, but the Rockbox manual is useful for "advanced" features.
 
It is very reliable : it fell on the ground several times, sometimes king of bugged, underwent countless formattings, firmware re-installations and Rockbox installations, and works as well as when I turned it up the first time.
 
And finally, as for the sound quality... well, I can't complain about it. I never spotted any lack of details or coloration compared to my GrubDAC. Even amped.
 
I truly think buying this DAP was the best thing I could do with 50 €.

Oeufdepoire

Head-Fier
Pros: Make distorted guitars sound really abrasive on metal tracks – and that is good indeed, don't require an amp
Cons: Cable is a little stiff and heavy
 ​
[size=11pt]Distorted guitars sound nicely abrasive. Listening to Immortal's At the heart of winter is like cleaning your ears with sandpaper. It's even more pronounced with the L-cushes. And I love that.[/size]
 
[size=11pt]The « stage » sounds somewhat flat, as if the band or anything was « projected on a screen ». It's not flatty flat, but we're far from the HD600's presentation, for example (I know they are different headphones from different price ranges, it's just for the comparison).[/size]
 
[size=11pt]What happens when I switch from the S-cushes to L-cuches :[/size]
  1. [size=11pt]the volume lowers and I have to turn it up,[/size]
  2. [size=11pt]the bass and mids lower more than the highs, thus the highs are brought out,[/size]
  3. [size=11pt]because the drivers are farther from the ears, the « stage » sounds a tad wider – but remains somewhat « flat ».[/size]
[size=11pt]Plus, I just can't wear the L-cushes with my glasses, and, even without, I find them less comfortable than the S. So, as for me, $36 (here in France) are too much for what the L-cushes provide. At least I can tell what the L-cushes actually do on the SR80i.[/size]
Oeufdepoire
Oeufdepoire
It was a joke. Of course you can listen to MP3 with them, but your definitely hear the difference between MP3 and lossless formats.
Oeufdepoire
Oeufdepoire
I mean, between low-bitrate MP3 and lossless formats.
manzana
manzana
Thanks for your review Oeufdepoire. I love this cans, they are more than expected when i bough it.
If you want listen the big diference between mp3 under 192kbps and lossless format you might consider Hifiman HE400. It will be very revealing...
anyway, thanks!

Oeufdepoire

Head-Fier
Pros: Ultra-portable, detachable cables, good sound
Cons: Short and fragile cable, hard clamping, made in China
The AKG K 450 is the first higher-than-SHS3200-end pair of cans I had (and at that time it's the only one). I wanted to be able to listen to good sound in the bus without hearing uninteresting conversations, so I started to search for good budget closed headphones for Christmas. After having spent four hours searching, comparing and reading reviews on Head-Fi.org ("Wow, this is a good site, I should keep it in mind..."), I decided that it had to be the K 450.
 
This will be rather a pragmatic review, because I don't master English very well yet.

 
Value: I wanted a very portable pair of "cheap" (60 € on Thomann) cans. I didn't wanted headphones I would have had to wear around my neck all day long. The K 450 isn't very expensive, and is carried very easily. The case takes up in an Eastpak The One bag, which is very handy, and it is quite tough. There are two cables in the K 450 packaging: a 50-centimeter long one (that is, in fact, 54.5-centimeter long [this is very important]) and a 110-centimeter long one. The 50-centimeter one is quite handy when you can put your source into your chest pocket. On the other hand, the 110-centimeter isn't long enough. Pluging it in you computer prevents you from moving freely, otherwise you pull on it, and it's quite fragile, as I could read on reviews. The headphones themselves looks (and are) pretty tough.
 
I have a problem with mine: the cable inside the headband is badly placed, and when I collapse the cans, the cable gets "hurt". This will cut it at last, I think.
EDIT : It has happened. The cable has cut down. I sent the 'phones back to have them changed.
 
Apart from this, even after one year of daily using, none of the cables cut, and the sound is still very good, maybe even better than at the origin (burnt in?).
 
Features: The K 450 come with :
   • Two detachable gold plated cables
   • A gold plated 1/4" > 1/8" adaptator
   • A gold plated 2,5 mm > 3.5 mm adaptator
   • A nice carrying case

 
Sound: I haven't had the opportunity to compare the K 450 with many other headphones or earbuds. All I can say is that it sounds better than Philips SHS3200 and than Panasonic RP-HTX7 (okay, these are cheaper, but I never had the chance to listen to more expensive headphones, so I compare with what I know). Sound is more... pure, more precise (you hear interferences very well). The K 450 sounds very well to my ears.
 
Edit : (Thanks to Lorspeaker) : After having listened to them carefully, I realized that I felt the bass instead of hearing them. I just EQed down the bass a bit, and it was better.
So yes, there are a lot of bass in these cans.
 
There are crappy distortion stains on Metallica songs from Death Magnetic. I don't know what component of the drums makes that noise, but it sounds crappy. Maybe it's 320 kbps MP3's fault, but I don't think so. Otherwise, even at high volume (20 out of 30 with my YP-K3), the sound is very pure.
 
I won't speak about the soundstage very precisely, because I've never heard cans with good soundstage and I don't know what it is. All I can say is that sound seems to come from very very close to you ears. Sometimes it is even right inside your skull (listening to Andy McKee with these is pretty surprising, it's like being inside his guitar).
 
 
Comfort: The K 450 clamps a bit hard, and it becomes a little uncomfortable from about one hour of listening, especially if you wear glasses (take them off, or it will really hurt).
 
 
So, as a conclusion, I will repeat the title: these are very good budget portable closed cans.
Lorspeaker
Lorspeaker
when i had this, i had to EQ it to reducedbass...then its quite balanced. to my ears :p
Oeufdepoire
Oeufdepoire
Fixed.
As I say, I'm not very experienced... Bass don't seem too loud to me with these cans, because I've never heard a flat sound through headphones.
I mainly made this review for the "material" side of this product.
Back
Top