Audeze LCD-5 Planar Magnetic Headphones

Introduction to the Audeze LCD-5 Review​

Audeze is one of those companies that you simply cannot dislike. Together with HiFiMAN they revolutionised the high-end headphones market marking the comeback of planar magnetic technology.
Ever since releasing the LCD-2 and LCD-3, they have been one of the most popular and beloved headphones manufacturers in the market. Known for their wonderful house sound, take-no-prisoners build quality, and excellent customer service, they gained a lot of fans and customers throughout the years.
After the huge success of the LCD-3 (I had 3 pairs during my life myself), Audeze released the LCD-4 around the year 2015. Just like its predecessors, it was a huge success for Audeze, marking the new TOTL headphones in the collection. It continued on the widely beloved sound characteristics that Audeze has been known for – dark, bassy, and powerful sounding.

We had to wait many years for the new Audeze flagship, but luckily, in 2021 the waiting was over, as they announced the brand-new LCD-5. The audiophile market was quite shocked, as the LCD-5 looked nothing like previous models. It looked smaller, and lighter, and gone were wooden cups, which have been one of the main characteristics of the LCD line flagships in the past.
It’s 2024 now, and I’m lucky enough to present my review of the Audeze LCD-5 to all of you. I spent a few months testing those, as they required a very detailed sound analysis for me to be ready to release this review. I feel it was worth the wait though, enjoy the read.

Packaging​

As I said in the introduction, a lot has changed with the release of the reviewed Audeze LCD-5, but not the unboxing experience in general. Just like previous models, the LCD-5 comes packed in a peli-style case that is incredibly secure and serves an actual purpose after unboxing your new Audeze LCD-5.
You see, display cases and wooden boxes are cool when you unbox the product for the first time, but after that, it just lands in your wardrobe and you won’t really use it anymore. If you want to take your new headphones with you, you have to get a transport case, spend money, worry if it’s gonna fit, etc.

Luckily, the tested Audeze LCD-5 continues on the trend of including a quality case that you can use for transportation of your brand-new precious pair of headphones. The box that comes with the LCD-5 is well-built, hard, and sturdy, nothing will happen to your headphones even if you drop it. At the same time, it looks nice and elegant with its all-black design, so this is basically a does-it-all type of packaging. I’m a big fan!



Inside the case, you’ll find your new Audeze LCD-5 (duh), a pair of cotton gloves, a certificate of authenticity, and a cable. As far as the cable goes, it’s a braided OCC copper cable that is just wonderful to use. Unlike many stock cables, I find absolutely no trouble with this one, as it’s comfortable to use and doesn’t get in the way. Also, I’m very happy that Audeze went with a classic copper conductor, no hybrids or silver plating. Copper just sounds right and it doesn’t add an artificial edge to the treble, unlike many silver-plated cables that manufacturers include with their headphones.
Overall, I’m very pleased with the unboxing experience of the Audeze LCD-5. It leaves nothing to be desired, it feels premium and functional.

Design, Build and Comfort​

Diving into the build quality and design of the reviewed Audeze LCD-5, here we have big changes in comparison to their previous models.
First of all, the main goal of Audeze when building the LCD-5 was weight reduction. Audeze products have always been known for their significant weight, reaching 700g with their LCD-4 and LCD-XC. For me personally, it never was a big issue, as weight distribution is far more important than the weight itself, but I definitely see problems with the big weight of your products.
Having owned a few LCD-3s and LCD-XCs in the past, I got used to their goliath-level weight after a while and I was easily able to use them for extended periods of time. However, at first, it definitely was a problem for me as well, as I was forced to take breaks every hour or so.
So, after a lot of feedback from customers, Audeze has successfully reduced the weight of the reviewed LCD-5 to an incredibly impressive 420g (the LCD-4 was 690g!). This is a great result, but the first question that comes to mind is…does it sacrifice the build quality? Well, let’s look right into it.
I’m going for a bold statement right away, as I don’t want to keep you on your toes – The Audeze LCD-5 is built absolutely beautifully and there are no compromises in its build whatsoever.

The overall design of the reviewed LCD-5 is vastly different from what Audeze has offered in the past. First things first – it’s significantly smaller, as their previous flagships were quite big and bulky. Audeze LCD-5 is what I would describe as your average-sized headphones, and you definitely won’t look as ridiculous wearing them as we all did in the past with their previous models.
Wooden rings, which have been used by Audeze for many years are gone, and the tested LCD-5 now uses a material called acetate. It has many advantages over wood, and the most important ones are weight reduction and lack of maintenance. If you owned the LCD-3 for example, you know that these wooden rings crack. I had cracked LCD-3 myself, and I took a good care of them. Acetate won’t crack, it’s lighter, and it also looks good, so this is a clear upgrade, especially when it comes to functionality.
I know people like wood and I’ve seen complaints about this change, but I honestly think this is more than reasonable.



Another completely redesigned thing about the reviewed Audeze LCD-5 are earpads. In the past, all LCD-series headphones used earpads that were flat on the section that touched your head. The new earpads are sculpted, and the point of contact is significantly smaller. The new design helps reduce unwanted resonances and interior reflections. At the same time, the new shape makes it easier for your ears to fit inside the earpads and it’s more comfortable during long listening sessions. Also, the earpads are made of real leather, which is a rarity in the current market. The quality of the material is superb and very pleasant to the touch. The LCD-5 definitely has one of the best earpads on the market.
The headband is also a piece of art. It uses a suspension strap design with a carbon-fiber arch on top. Carbon fiber provides fantastic rigidity and very low weight, which is basically what you want from your headband. Also, you don’t have to worry about the headband snapping or losing its shape, even after years of everyday use. in all fairness, I don’t think I have to explain further, why carbon fiber is the best possible material for a headband.
Overall, the Audeze LCD-5 gives you an insane feeling with its overall build and design. It’s built perfectly, it feels great in your hands and on your head. There’s just something extraordinary to it, making it one of the most exciting headphones to hold and use on the planet right now.

Tech​

Reviewed Audeze LCD-5 is obviously an LCD series headphone, so of course it uses a planar-magnetic driver. The one you’ll find here has been re-engineered and improved compared to their previous models though.
To help you better understand the differences, let me start with describing what a planar-magnetic driver actually is. Planar magnetic drivers are known for their ability to deliver highly accurate sound reproduction with low distortion. In planar magnetic drivers, a thin diaphragm is suspended between magnets, and the audio signal is passed through the diaphragm, causing it to move and produce sound.

It is the leading technology for high-end headphones nowadays. It offers fantastic speed, clarity, and detail reproduction, but they are also known for not having the biggest bass impact. Dynamic driver headphones usually hit harder in bass frequencies, but they mostly don’t offer the level of clarity and speed.
Now let’s dive into what’s changed when compared to the drivers you can find in the LCD-4.
One of the key changes in the Audeze LCD-5 driver is the implementation of a nano-scale diaphragm. Audeze used this technology to create an ultra-thin diaphragm with unparalleled precision. This nano-scale diaphragm offers several advantages, including improved transient response, reduced distortion, and increased efficiency compared to the diaphragm found in the LCD-4.



Both the LCD-4 and reviewed LCD-5 feature Audeze’s patented Fluxor magnet array technology. However, in the LCD-5, this technology has been further refined and optimized for enhanced performance. The Fluxor magnet array consists of an array of powerful neodymium magnets strategically arranged to provide uniform magnetic flux density across the diaphragm, resulting in improved driver efficiency and sensitivity.
Another important thing is the magnet array. Historically, first planar headphones after the planar revolution were double-sided, then manufacturers started going for single-sided arrays mainly to reduce the weight of the drivers. The double-sided array allows for increased magnetic flux density and improved control over the diaphragm movement, resulting in greater accuracy and resolution in the audio reproduction.

Also, Both the LCD-4 and LCD-5 incorporate Fazor waveguides, which are proprietary components designed to control and improve the interaction of sound waves as they pass through the earcups. In the LCD-5, the Fazor waveguides have been further refined and optimized to work with the other advancements of the drivers.
All of this is supposed to give a technical edge to the LCD-5 over its predecessor, and I think Audeze definitely delivered. At the end of the day, it’s the sound that matters, not marketing information, so let me just get straight into the sound description.

Sound of the reviewed Audeze LCD-5​

I’m going to start this paragraph with something very important. You have to keep in mind, that if you’re a long-term fan of Audeze house sound, the LCD-5 is NOTHING like it. Gone is that legendary dark, smooth, and relaxed timbre that was known as the “Audeze” sound for about 10 years.
Ironically, the strongest point of both the LCD-3 and LCD-4 was their bass response, and I think that the bass is the weakest point of the LCD-5. Don’t get me wrong, it’s nothing remotely close to being “underperforming”, but you’ll get my point in if you’ll keep reading.
So, what kind of sound profile did Audeze go for with the LCD-5 you’d ask? I’d describe it as neutral with the biggest focus placed on the treble frequencies. It’s not a chill and relax headphone anymore, more of a hyper-detailed, lightning-fast tool to please audiophiles who look for that last percent of technical superiority in their equipment.

Let’s start with the bass. The biggest change here is the amount of low frequencies you’re getting, as Audeze has been known for a thick, big bass response for many years. Compared to LCD-3 and LCD-4, the new flagship is thin and speed-oriented in the bass department. I would actually say that it’s one of the bass-lightest high-end headphones currently available. Out of the TOTL headphones I have here, the LCD-5 is the lightest in the bass. However, light doesn’t mean bad, as the quality of the bass here is absolutely outstanding.
The detail, resolution, speed, and impact are all great on the Audeze LCD-5. It’s not the biggest impact, don’t get me wrong, but it’s very firm and satisfying regardless of the size. If the bass is supposed to hit hard and get very snappy, it does brilliantly with the LCD-5.
You can actually get used to the quantity of bass rather easily. At first, I was like “Oh this is waaaay too light for my preferences”, but after a few days, it started to sound just right. Right now I don’t feel like the bass is lacking at all, it’s just not in the center of attention. Yeah, if you like your bass big you won’t enjoy it without EQ, but the LCD-5 handles EQ like a champ, so it’s not a big issue in my opinion. The bass without EQ is just all about quality – the speed, resolution, different textures, and being able to change from soft to firm in a matter of milliseconds. This is a very impressive bass response that the more you listen to, the more impressed you’ll get.



The midrange is very natural, smooth, and hyper-detailed. It just feels tonally perfect to me, giving you a beautifully correct timbre and loads of resolution. The midrange is slightly forward in comparison to the rest of the frequency response, but I wouldn’t call the reviewed Audeze LCD-5 significantly midrange forward, mainly because of its treble response.
The amount of detail retrieval and resolution are both top-notch here, being one of the best in the market. While some competitors might sound more colored and “beautiful”, the Audeze LCD-5 gives you nothing but the truth, but it never overdoes it. In all that technical superiority, the LCD-5 never gets tiring or aggressive sounding, it’s a headphone that you can easily listen to for an entire day and not get tired or overfed with it. This is the aspect that is by far the most impressive about the midrange in my opinion. A lot of technicality-focused headphones just sound forced, too revealing, and aggressive. The LCD-5 is smooth like butter, but still insanely detailed, on the same level as the best of the best in the world.
Every single type of vocal and instrument sounds pleasing with the LCD-5. The combination of its excellent tonality with loads of resolution just works wonders. If you’ve ever heard the Sennheiser HD600, then you can kind of feel what I’m talking about. However, keep in mind that the LCD-5 is a FAR superior headphone to the HD600 in every single term, it’s just similar when it comes to tonality. The HD600 doesn’t come close when it comes to speed, detail, and resolution, as it should be considering the huge difference in price.

Now let’s talk about the treble, which is just exceptional. To be completely honest, the LCD-5 has the best treble response that I’ve ever heard from both dynamic and planar-magnetic headphones. Yes, big words, but I really mean them.
First things first, the Audeze LCD-5 has a perfect level of shine and texture. It’s a definition of the treble that is a lot, but not too much. I’m quite sensitive to treble, often feeling that a certain product is just a bit “too much” for me. The LCD-5 has a lot of treble, but it never ever goes over the line for me. The sibilance is non-existent, but the amount of details and air are both class-leading.
The overall technical aspect of the LCD-5’s treble is an absolute dream. This is the headphone to use if you want an ultimate insight into the recording, but not to the point when you feel you’re sacrificing other things. Guitar strings and female vocals sound exceptionally natural and insightful, with a significant crunch and shine to it. To be honest, it’s not easy to describe this treble response without going overboard with statements like “the best”, and “perfect”, as I actually feel both could describe it quite accurately. If you’re a treble-head and you’re looking for headphones in this price range, the LCD-5 is an obvious choice for you, and one that I would recommend without the slightest hesitation.

The soundstage of the reviewed Audeze LCD-5 is something that I would describe as natural, but not specifically “impressive”. It doesn’t have that huge concert hall effect, but this isn’t a bad thing specifically. Fans of huge soundstages have a lot of headphones to choose from, and the LCD-5 definitely isn’t one of them. The size alone here is rather moderate, and it further improves on that incredibly technical and detailed vibe you’re getting from this headphone.
What should you expect then? A soundstage that sounds correct, not too small, not too big. It suits the rest of the sound characteristics of the Audeze LCD-5 perfectly, as I feel like a huge staging wouldn’t fit this headphone. It definitely is a pro for those who want the maximum transparency and “as close to the recording as it gets” type of sound.

Comparisons​

HiFiMAN Susvara



Let’s start the comparisons with a bold move and compare the LCD-5 to the HiFiMAN Susvara, the current leader of our “Battle Of The Flagships” article, which means, in my opinion, this is the best headphone on the market right now, at least from those I tried for long enough.
While both the Susvara and the LCD-5 play in the same league, they are quite significantly different from each other. The Susvara is more relaxed, thicker sounding with a more flavored timbre. The LCD-5 on the other hand is all about that speed and transparency.
When it comes to detail retrieval, I would rate them very similarly. Both are exceptional when it comes to resolution and getting all the micro details from the mix. It doesn’t really get better than this. You’ll hear everything, whether you like it or not. Both are actually so detailed that I’m unable to listen to vinyl through them. All the little cracks are there, nothing is hidden, everything is exceptionally clear and forward. That level of detail retrieval makes the details pop, you don’t have to really focus to hear them all. They are all served to you on a silver plate, and they are a natural part of the overall sound you’re getting.
When it comes to tonality, the Susvara definitely has a bigger, thicker bass response. The LCD-5 is faster and snappier, but it lacks some weight in comparison. After using the Susvara for a long time, you will need some time to readjust to the bass of the LCD-5, as it will sound thin coming from the HiFiMAN flagship.
The midrange is again, thicker and more colored (in a good way) in Susvara, while the LCD-5 sounds more neutral and more technical-oriented. Because of this, the LCD-5 might sound a bit faster, but the Susvara is an incredibly fast-sounding headphone to begin with, so this is even more impressive.
The treble is quite simple. The Susvara has a beautiful-sounding treble that has a lot of detail and resolution, but as I already stated – the LCD-5 has the best treble response I’ve heard from a planar-magnetic headphone, so I’ll give an edge to the American flagship here. It’s just more prominent, even more exciting sounding and it offers a bit more when it comes to the absolute resolution.
Overall, both pairs are truly spectacular and it would be best to own both. Choose the Susvara if you’re more into a romantic type of sound, and choose the LCD-5 if you’re after an ultimate resolution and neutral tuning. Or just get two and forget about the world.

Meze Elite


Now we’ll take a look at two vastly different headphones. The Meze Elite is a master of enjoyment. This is a high-end headphone that is all about giving you fun, emotions, and just pure bliss.
On the other hand, the LCD-5 is all about that fast and detailed, neutral presentation, which is just something totally opposite. It’s not supposed to charm you with its color, rather than just give you all the truth there is in the recording.
Because of that, it’s really hard to pick the winner here. These two headphones are so vastly different and they are both exceptional at what they’re supposed to do.
Another thing is the build quality and design. They both are built fantastically and both are highly addicting when it comes to their overall presentation. These could be the two best-built headphones on the market, so again, it’s really hard to pick the winner.
What we can objectively rate though is the technical performance, such as detail retrieval and resolution. In this regard, the LCD-5 is clearly a superior headphone. It’s more insightful, faster, and more detailed. However, these were never the aspects that the Elite focused on.
So, picking up one of the two should come down to a question – what do you value the most? The Elite should be your pick if you want a colorful, relaxed, and super fun presentation. The LCD-5 is an obvious choice if you’re into detail, speed, and clarity. It’s that simple.

Final D8000 Pro


This comparison is more complicated since both headphones aim at a similar goal. Both the LCD-5 and the D8000 Pro are meant to be neutral, reference-grade headphones that value detail and speed the most.
However, there are levels to this game, and I think the LCD-5 is just a superior headphone when it comes to their strengths.
Both the D8000 Pro and the LCD-5 try to achieve the same thing, but the LCD-5 just does it better. It’s more detailed, faster, snappier, and more exciting sounding.
The build quality and comfort are both better on the LCD-5 as well. The D8000 Pro isn’t too comfortable, while the LCD-5 is easy for me to wear for hours without any issues.
The D8000 Pro is still a fantastic headphone, but I somewhat feel that the LCD-5 proved it could use an update if it is to keep up with the competition.

Pairings​

Feliks Envy + XI Audio K-DAC


I’m going to give you guys 3 pairings, but let me explain one thing at the very beginning. The LCD-5 might not be hard to drive, but it absolutely requires a very high-quality system. It’s not about the amount of power, but rather about the quality of the signal you’re pumping right into these.
Because the LCD-5 is so detailed and fast, it’ll show you every single shortcoming in your system. If you want to get the best results using them, you absolutely need to give them the best possible signal and power you are able to. Of course, you can easily use them with cheaper equipment and be happy with it.
It is until you plug them into some very serious equipment though, that they start sounding like a complete Summit-Fi headphone. In this instance, I used a setup consisting of the XI Audio K-DAC R2R DAC plugged into the Feliks Envy. It is a Summit-Fi, 300B tube amplifier by a Polish company called Feliks Audio. It is an absolute behemoth, with the price set at a whopping 7000 Euro.

When plugged into this system, the LCD-5 sounds ridiculously good, to the point where you simply cannot stop listening to music. It keeps you on your toes, gives you all the detail and resolution in the world, and a majestic frequency response.
Actually, this setup makes the LCD-5 a little bit more colored than it usually sounds, without compromising even a single percent of its raw technical capabilities. Because of that, the LCD-5 transforms into an even more impressive and enjoyable headphone that I could easily live with till the end of my days.
The Envy also has a lot of power, which the LCD-5 might not need, but it doesn’t hurt. That reserve of power gives it huge dynamics and great slam, and the sound as a whole doesn’t feel forced whatsoever.
This whole system is a definition of High-End audio, it does it all with such an elegance it’s just addicting. Definitely a setup worth its insane asking price.

EarMen Tradutto + EarMen CH-AMP


You don’t really need such a behemoth-level system for the LCD-5 to sound fantastically though. Take a look at the EarMen stack, which costs a fraction of the price of the Feliks Envy alone.
When plugged into this setup, the LCD-5 sounds exceptionally detailed, fast, and natural. The EarMen stack is easily capable of driving the LCD-5 and giving it the quality it requires to sound great. It’s not the last word, but it’s definitely enough for a lot of people.
This is important because you don’t need to buy a 10k USD setup to be able to get a great sound out of your new headphones. A system like this will be plenty enough to already get a very high quality of sound without needing a bank loan.
If you’ve got the money for it, sure, just go for the first system and call it a day, you’ll be set for decades. However, if you don’t have an unlimited money glitch, something like Earmen Tradutto + CH-AMP will also do the job.

Fiio M15S


And to continue on this topic even further, the Audeze LCD-5 sounds pretty good even from a DAP.
Once again, it’s not their full potential we’re talking about here, but it’s still an incredibly high quality. Rather than simply buying the LCD-5 to use with a DAP, I’m thinking more of a specific scenario, where you have a good stationary setup for them, but still want to listen to your new favorite headphones in bed or in your garden.
If you’d buy a HiFiMAN Susvara for example, you just aren’t driving them from a DAP, not a chance. It’s a different story with the LCD-5, which you can easily enjoy even from a mid-range DAP.

Audeze LCD-5 – summary​

The release of the Audeze LCD-5 was full of surprises. Audeze introduced a brand new design, and more importantly – a completely new sound philosophy, which shocked their most loyal customers.

However, with the LCD-5, Audeze introduced a never-seen-before quality when it comes to their headphones. The current flagship is an extremely well-performing headphone that sits among the best headphones in the world.
Excellent build quality meets the sound that is simply screaming High-End. And don’t even get me started on its godlike treble response.

Wildly recommended!


Big thanks to Ari and Audeze for providing us with the LCD-5 for this review. I wasn’t paid or asked to say anything good or bad about this product, all of the above is just my personal, unbiased opinion.

Introduction​

Hi Guys,

Today we are taking a look at the most recent flagship planar magnetic headphones from Giant in the space, the LCD-5 from Audeze. Audeze made their name as part of the early planar magnetic headphone resurgence about a decade and a half ago with headphones like the LCD-1, and original LCD-2. Since then, in terms of flagship headphones from Audeze, we have seen the LCD-3, LCD-4, and LCD-5. I have owned the LCD-3 and LCD-4 long term and was really interested in what the LCD-5 was like as it was such a massive departure from both their signature design and past tunings. The original LCD series were typified by their wood rings, heavy build, and usually relaxed and warm tuning (to varying degrees.) The LCD-5 has moved away from that entirely, being much lighter, and slightly smaller physically, with a much more upper mid forward and neutral type of presentation sonically. Tuning-wise, the LCD-5 is very similar to Audeze’s co-flagship headphone, the electrostatic CRBN (which I reviewed a few months back.)

Tuning​

In general, I wasn’t a huge fan of the stock tuning of the CRBN, but found with EQ it became an incredibly enjoyable pair of headphones. Due to the LCD-5 being so similar in terms of stock tuning, this was the case again. The overall sound of the LCD-5 does differ from the CRBN in some ways, but overall in terms of tuning alone, they are very similar. I’ll speak about the tuning in its stock form, and then about EQ in relation to the LCD-5 afterwards.

The low end of the LCD-5 is entirely neutral. No recession, no boost. This is pretty common amongst planar magnetic headphones, and the LCD-5 is no exception. In previous LCD models, the bass was always a strong point, but could at times be slow sounding. The LCD-5 is the fastest and most accurate of all the LCD headphones in terms of bass. Impact/slam is one aspect that surprised me. The LCD-5 isn’t far away from the Abyss 1266TC in this area, and the 1266TC is the best on the market with regards to slam/impact. As with most headphones, I prefer a low shelf of some sort(adjust to personal preference obviously) to be applied via EQ as I prefer a more robust bass response than the LCD-5 has in its stock tuning.

The mid-range of the LCD-5 is incredibly similar to the CRBN and incredibly different from past LCD models. In terms of the low mid-range, it is much more neutral, less warm, and “gooey” for lack of a better term. The upper mid-range is very similar to the CRBN with a massive 3khz peak. This is also a departure from the much more recessed upper mid-range of previous LCD models. The 3khz peak is too much for me, and I adjusted that area via EQ. I think that the perceived overly forward upper mids nature of the LCD-5 is partly due to the 3khz peak, but also due to the much more subdued low end and treble than would normally be paired with such a peak. I found the 3khz area much less problematic if I simply boosted the low end and treble, but overall, preferred if it was slightly lowered via EQ. I think this upper mid-range is down to personal preference, and what is too much for one person might be just right for the next. As with the bass, the overall transparency, speed, and detail of the driver help convey the mids very well.

The treble of the LCD-5 is again, fairly neutral. It isn’t overly boosted or overly recessed. The treble is quite similar to the previous LCD models, perhaps being slightly less pronounced. For me, it isn’t enough overall in terms of level. I think that in combination with the very forward upper mids, it makes the treble come across as being less pronounced than it actually is. Again, this is something that is easily remedied with EQ, tweaked to personal preferences. The treble is very transparent and detailed, as with the rest of the frequency response.

Technical Performance​

In terms of technical performance, the LCD-5 is a big step forward in most areas compared to previous LCD models, and a step back in some other ways. It is without a doubt the most detailed, transparent, impactful, and clean-sounding driver Audeze has come up with thus far. I even think that it slightly edges out the CRBN in terms of overall detail levels and transparency, which is impressive given the CRBN is an electrostatic headphone. The LCD-5’s soundstage is less grand sounding than the LCD-4, and I feel this is something some people might miss. If I had to come up with an analogy, the LCD-4 is a big cozy armchair that envelops you, and the LCD-5 is a carbon fiber racing bucket seat with a 5-point harness. The LCD-5 is the higher-performing headphone, but there is something to be said for the LCD-4 and other LCD series more laid-back nature. Overall the technical performance of the LCD-5 is incredibly impressive.

As I have mentioned previously, the stock tuning out of the box with the LCD-5 is not personally for me. It is too forward in the upper mids and lacks low-end and treble presence for my taste. The thing is, the LCD-5 has incredibly low distortion and takes to EQ very, very well. I didn’t end up doing anything drastic, and it turned it into a headphone I greatly enjoyed. I just applied a low and high shelf, and slightly reduced the 3khz peak. With these adjustments in combination with the slam and impact I mentioned speaking about the low end, the LCD-5 sort of reminded me of the Abyss 1266TC. In a way, like a more focused smaller sounding 1266TC.

Build Quality and Comfort​

The build quality and overall design are also a massive departure from previous LCD series headphones. Gone are the classic wood rings, replaced with acetate tortoiseshell. Gone are the big sumptuous leather pads, replaced with fluted leather. The overall size has shrunk, I would guess by about 10%. The LCD-5 does feel slightly smaller on your ears than the previous LCD series headphones. The headband is carbon fiber, to help achieve the weight savings that the LCD-5 has managed. With the LCD-4 you were looking at around 700-710 grams for the headphones, and with the LCD-5 that has been reduced to 420 grams. I feel that 420 grams is much more reasonable, and I haven’t had any issues with comfort over my time with the LCD-5. They are not as comfortable as something like the Meze ELITE (and empyrean) which are still the gold standard in my opinion for headphone comfort, but they are entirely usable for long periods without discomfort. The LCD-5 comes with a very nice and well-made braided cable terminated in 4-pin XLR, with a 4-pin XLR to 6.35mm TRS adapter. This has you covered for most uses, and a cheap 4-pin XLR to 4.4mm Pentaconn adapter from Amazon would round that out nicely.

One thing to mention about the LCD is that it is much different from previous LCD series headphones in terms of sensitivity and impedance. The LCD-4 was a headphone with a 200ohm impedance and a 97db/mw sensitivity, whilst the LCD5 has an impedance of only 14ohms and 90db/mw sensitivity. This is worth taking into consideration as although the impedance has massively reduced, the sensitivity is much lower. It will take some experimentation to find out which amp works best for your uses, and whether or not you will be using it in a portable setting, etc…For example, due to the uncharacteristically low impedance, I ended up having to use the iFi Diablo 2’s single-ended output instead of the balanced output, as I was hitting the current protection and the unit was shutting off with the balanced 4.4mm out, but there were no issues using the single-ended output. This will entirely depend on the gear you are using, so experiment and see what you find works best.

Comparisons​

In terms of comparisons with the LCD-5 being the current flagship planar magnetic headphone from a juggernaut in the space, it makes sense to compare it to other options.

Compared to the Hifiman Susvara, the LCD-5 is more aggressive and less laid back. It is slightly less detailed than the Susvara but does have more impact, whilst also being more focused sounding with a smaller soundstage. Of the two, I prefer the Susvara, but the LCD-5 is much easier to drive, and also 1500USD cheaper at MSRP.

Against the Abyss 1266TC, there are more similarities than you might expect (if EQ is applied.) The LCD-5 is slightly less detailed but does come close in terms of impact and slam. The 1266TC has a much bigger overall sound and soundstage but is heavier and slightly less comfortable. These are both very different headphones, with a few similarities in terms of technical performance if the LCD-5 is used with EQ. Again, there is a large difference in cost at 4500USD for the LCD-5.

The Meze Elite is the closest comparison in terms of MSRP, with the ELITE being 4000USD, and the LCD-5 being 4500USD. The Elite actually sort of reminds me more of the LCD-4 in terms of tuning, being slightly warmer and laid back in its overall nature. The LCD-5 is more detailed, with more transparency, impact, and slam. The ELITE is grander sounding, with a bigger sonic image and a much bigger soundstage. Comfort goes to the ELITE, but it is a class leader in this area.

Compared to Audezes co flagship, the CRBN, the LCD-5 has an incredibly similar frequency response. It has a smaller soundstage, especially in terms of soundstage height. It is very slightly more resolving and transparent than the CRBN, which surprised me due to the CRBN’s electrostatic nature. The big plus for the LCD-5 is the lack of need for an electrostatic amplifier. I’d be very curious to see Audeze try a Planar Magnetic headphone in the form factor of the CRBN, that could be a real winner.

Conclusion​

Overall, the LCD-5 is a very interesting addition to Audeze’s lineup and a very big departure from their previous LCD series headphones in general. It is a much physically lighter and smaller headphone, with an entirely different tuning. I am not a fan of the tuning of the LCD-5 in its stock form, with it being too upper mid-forward, whilst lacking low and high end for my personal preferences. However, after applying EQ to make it more in line with my personal preferences, the LCD-5 became an incredibly enjoyable headphone to listen to. It is very detailed, transparent, and has a surprising amount of impact/slam. Overall comfort levels and weight in particular are a big improvement over the previous LCD headphones, but at times I did miss that sumptuous feel that the LCD4 had, for example. In a way, it is like a big comfortable 1980s Bentley Turbo R vs a 911 GT2RS. Both are great, just very different. With regards to the stock tuning not being my preference, I know that there are people out there who love the LCD-5’s stock tuning, so I would highly recommend you give them a try if you are not sure. You may not feel the need for EQ, and the stock tuning might be right up your alley.

I’m really curious about what is next for Audeze, especially with their recent acquisition by Sony PlayStation. The LCD-5 is a great addition to their lineup, but I’d also like to see them continue to experiment with other tunings and form factors (like the CRBN) whilst trying to maintain the level of technical performance the LCD-5 has achieved. Great stuff Audeze!

My road to the audio summit feels more like a speedrun. Starting off with a BTR5 and the Starfield, i ended up not two years later seeking a summit. I just wanted to skip all the middle men and the trap of marginal improvement, and jump to the summit. Took a while, watched videos, read reviews, and here i am.
Maybe this should have been my first review, but instead ended up one of the latest. Why? Because i feel like every single time i put them on the LCD-5 feel like the first time. The sound, the detail....well spoiler alert i love this headphone and i could let go of all my other headphones and IEM and just keep the LCD-5.

With that out of the way, what did i get my hands on?
Only on a monster of detail, tonal accuracy and (shocking assertion to some) a very comfy headphone.

Let's start right off the bat, detail. I could go all in about how my most loved songs sounded "new", but it's true. You hear something on these, it becomes THE benchmark. If it's in the recording, you WILL hear it. I swear you could find out if a singer had a heavy dinner the night before he recorded when using this headphone.
Instrument separation is phenomenal, every source is laser-clear to the point you can point exactly every source of sound. On a side note, you WILL get accused of using a wallhack when playing online FPS, these make you feel like daredevil had a child with a bat. blind firing in smokescreens because you know where the enemy is, is a satisfaction that will never become old. neither the insults you will receive for such acustic accuracy.
Having such levels of acoustic clarity comes with one "disadvantage", that is either you feed it a clean track or you WILL know every defect of it. I had to delete some albums and find better sources sorely because they were "faulty" when listened to this glorified acustical electronic microscope.
Soundstage is just right, neither something that feels too distant nor in your face. It all sits "properly" where it should. I can't stretch enuogh how this headphone is just a living benchmark to the audio field.
Another point of clarity isn't just how detailed the sound is, but also how everything sounds just "right", no note hangs in the air or lags, no distortion, every single genre i feed it just ends up prosented to me just like it should. Bold assertion but i WILL stand by it.

Frequency presentation is to my ear pitch perfect. Some call it mid forward, but i don't feel it and voices don't kill other sounds, basses are great, highs are just the right level of intensity and clarity.
Bass being great doesn't mean it's a bass-centric headphone. For that i would reccomend the Kennerton Heartland, that feels like a LCD-5 junior with added bass power while keeping almost all the clarity. (seriously, if you have a chance go try those if you want a bass improved headphone that is still very resolving)

I could just end the review here, they are great, go look for a deal on them by some sellers and just buy them and skip the whole grind of spending as much as an LCD5 in 3-4 headphones for just marginal improvements.

But yeah it's a big investment, so I'll hammer home the point of their greatness:

Songs:

Body Company (Club Hit) - You can just close your eyes and you're in a club with this song blasting out, you feel right there, highs don't shrill, bass is always in control, the male voice is always clear and defined.

PAPA PLastic - The guitar intro is just pure pleasure, the female vocal is so intimate it whispers in your hear, the battery is there in the background to hammer home the bass. Bliss with the LCD5.

Me Machine - Electronic song, reproduced without a single hitch, bass and highs working side by side, never mixing or overlapping, an excersize in high/low frequency interaction.

Come Fly With Me - Frank Sinatra - You're there, sinatra is on stage, and the orchestra is just behind him. This is how i'd rate the experience on the LCD-5. I think shy of resurrecting him, you'll never hear it better than with the LCD-5

Isn't She Lovely - Chesky Records35th Anniversary - Pair up a monster of mastering called Chesky Records, use the best resolving headphone, and you've got a match made in heaven. If you never listened to their songs do it, and remember to try the LCD5 with those. I literally am sitting there, in front of the band, the singer is singing like a meter from me, on the left i have the bass, on the right the guitar and on the center sitting a little behidng the singer, the percussions. If there are songs that can highlight how much really a headphone can be resolving, chesky's are the ideal. Again, frequency is just perfect every instrument is tuned to perfection, every detail, the position of all musicians, so clearly defined!

Beethoven Symphony No.9 Op.125 Choral - Herbert von Karajan - You're there, in the music hall, and again unless you resurrect Karajan, ol' Wolf Ears heard through the LCD5 is as close as you can get as going back in time and listening to one of his concerts.


Is there A single bad thing?
Oh yes three. First, i got a first edition, and those have a TIGHT xlr connection, requiring you to carefully unplug the XLR end so that you don't over-stress the socket. Bit tricky at first but then it's easy. Fixed on later production models.
Then, the fact that the angle of the XLR connectors should have been slightly more forwad facing. If i tilt my head too much it touches on my SCM muscle.
And the ear cups are glued with glue tape. No easy detach mechanism. This feels like a big oversight that could have been so easily solved it's a mistery how it didn't get solved in planning stage. A magnet or a screw in mechanism would have done muuuch better. Thankfully i don't have to change the pads but beware: you gotta have a strong stomach if you need to change them.

So 9.95/10, and my only gripe are the xlr plug and not too friendly earpads. The rest is just perfect. I hope for a LCD-5 Mk 2 with just those fixes.

PS: They are good when paired with something that has power. They are no crazy-inefficient susvara but i bought an A70pro just to be safe. I had a K9Pro before that and the improvement was marginal, yet present. So don't skimp on the amp section, even more because it's something that right now can be done quite on the cheap with great results. For a dac, i use a E70 velvet because i'm hooked on the AK4499 sound. Yet, i manage to enjoy them on my RS8 (high gain, no turbo) without pushing the sound level. I used them with the R6Pro2 that has way less power, and indeed it felt they were a little choked.