Awesome! Thank you everyone at Hifiman!! 

  You can still submit, they are doing a drawing next month (Oct 1) .  Just send your original invoice, and your Head-fi ID to the email on the first page of this thread.

HE1000 has a bigger soundstage, more neutral, more laid back, more depth, the more accurate headphone, more comfortable.   LCDX has more bass, more bass impact, more intimate, midrange is debatable (I prefer LCDX)   HE1000 is my favorite headphone I own, so I'm bias.  My pre-fazor LCD3 does...

I'm not sure what to think about the new upgraded driver to be honest.  I bought the headphone used and as part of testing it I ran bass shaker tests and noticed right away that one of the drivers was rattling so I RMA'd it within a few days of owning it.  I really only know what the new drivers...

  That is my LCD-X with the new 2016 drivers as you can tell from the graph they were replaced on March 9, 2016.

    Looking forward to the measurements, thanks in advance for posting them!   Just out of curiosity, what are your impressions between the Ebony and the  D7000?  Did you like one more than the other, and if you did why?  

  It would be nice if the weave pattern is a 1x1 weave and not the 2x2 that is on the Ether C.  The 1x1 would look more "checker board" and not as "zig-zaggy" as the Ether C.

You can already see Tylls measurements for the Elear.   Or do you mean the Utopia?

Definitely looking forward to your impressions of the Abyss and Utopia.  Especially in comparison of the HE1000.   Do you have impressions of the LCD4 in comparison to the HE1000?

  Sorry to hear about your headphones.  Out of curiosity, would you say they are equal weight to your LCD2.2s?  Mind commenting on the comfort since it would be silly to comment on the sound?

Great information and I agree with you about the graphs.  Now if only someone can post a 2016-revision LCD3 graph.  I'm curious to see if the 2016 revision has a FR more like the LCD-4 or if they kept the FR like how my pre-fazor is.   My assumption is Audeze puts the same tune on all their...

  Just for comparison purposes:  This graph is for my pre-fazor LCD3.   You can definitely see "Audeze tuning" in the two.  Of course, the older headphone drops before 2k hz and has a bump at 5k hz that the newer revisions and LCD4 keep more neutral.  Strange enough, the LCD3 doesn't have...

    Here is my LCDX with new 2016 drivers.   I doubt you got LCD4 drivers, the newer revisions are said to have more treble than before.

Yeah.  I misspoke.  Let me correct that.  What I meant was when Audeze added Fazors to the LCD-2 and LCD-3 it reduced the bass in comparison to the Non-Fazor'd LCD-2 and LCD-3.  But yeah, its not like the LCD-3F has no bass, it just has less than it did before it got Fazors.  Although, I hear...

  I think this is easy to explain.  You are comparing the LCD-X to a fazor LCD-3.  It's widely known that the LCD-3F lacks in bass in comparison to the non-Fazor LCD-3.  I was speaking about my personal LCD-3 that does NOT have a fazor.  Another explanation is the variance in LCD drivers.  I've...

If I were you I'd double check that it is the 200 ohm version.  That version is much more reliable than the original.  If it isn't maybe the seller can ship it to Audeze first?

Have not heard the LCD-4 yet, but I own the LCD-3 (non fazor), LCD-X, and HE1000.   LCD-3- More bass than the LCD-X to my ears (just goes to show the variance in LCD models) also much more detailed than the LCD-X and generally a better headphone (does a better job at doing the Audeze house...

I'd recommend any of the Fiio gear.  They have a bass boost and great battery life.  I personally own the Fiio E17k.  It's a DAC/amp combo that works with any cell phone.

I might be interested, PM me a price.  Also you might want to consider putting them up in the classifieds when you can.

It's dat boi.... am I doing it right?  Anyway, I'm new, also, sorta.  More a lurker, but welcome!

I can understand you liking the vocals more on the HE1000 as it's not as recessed as they feel on the TH-X00. If the HE1000 had the bass slam, quantity of the TH-X00 but kept the planar quality it would be my ultimate headphone.

Is foobar better than itunes?

Nope, they do not.

No, unfortuantely, they don't.  The 202 is also a headphone you may consider and recently it was praised by Tyll Herstons, author and owner of innerfidelity.  You can check out an article he wrong about them...