leeperry
Galvanically isolated his brain
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2004
- Posts
- 13,832
- Likes
- 1,696
Quote:
if you're looking for a crazily analytical sound, most definitely.
the SQ is so good that many recordings that sounded fine on the STX just lack now on the ST...it's put the bar one notch further
the stereo image is just way better, far less crossfeed/distortion...I read that some ppl were disturbed by the LME49720 level of details, that's exactly what I'm experiencing right now....there's FAR too many details for my little earthling ears, it'll take some time to get used to I guess
PS: the ST is less than US $10 more expensive than the STX.
Originally Posted by e6600 /img/forum/go_quote.gif so would you say that a stock ST > STx by a big margin? or even possibly worth a price increase ($200-280?) |
if you're looking for a crazily analytical sound, most definitely.
the SQ is so good that many recordings that sounded fine on the STX just lack now on the ST...it's put the bar one notch further
![biggrin.gif](http://www.head-fi.org/forums/images/smilies/http://hfimage.head-fi.org/smilies/biggrin.gif)
the stereo image is just way better, far less crossfeed/distortion...I read that some ppl were disturbed by the LME49720 level of details, that's exactly what I'm experiencing right now....there's FAR too many details for my little earthling ears, it'll take some time to get used to I guess
![ksc75smile.gif](http://www.head-fi.org/forums/images/smilies/ksc75smile.gif)
PS: the ST is less than US $10 more expensive than the STX.