marvin
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
- Posts
- 2,580
- Likes
- 18
Quote:
There's really no incentive for providers to allow a transfer. The only practical way for it to come about would be for a boneheaded content provider to take a resale to court and lose.
As for the limited license thing, Autodesk pushed that line of reasoning in Vernor v. Autodesk to prevent Vernor from reselling his copy of Autocad. They lost.
Originally Posted by Zodduska /img/forum/go_quote.gif I agree that the laws regarding resale of digital downloads haven't been settled but the technical barriers are easily within reach it's just that either there is little incentive for the providers to allow it (although they could profit by charging a transaction fee) or the content creators don't want to allow it.. yet. Until it becomes a big enough issue and there is sufficient pressure from consumers to look into the legality regarding the transfer of digital media for monetary gain we will never see it come to light. In my opinion all of this content is sold as a limited licence therefor full ownership rights would not apply, but I'm no lawyer. |
There's really no incentive for providers to allow a transfer. The only practical way for it to come about would be for a boneheaded content provider to take a resale to court and lose.
As for the limited license thing, Autodesk pushed that line of reasoning in Vernor v. Autodesk to prevent Vernor from reselling his copy of Autocad. They lost.