Quote:
Originally Posted by DrBenway /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I think you've put your finger on the difference between listening -- really listening -- to an artist, and using that artist as a lifestyle accessory. I can't really blame people, because music does naturally evoke the life experiences that went with listening to it. But I do believe that true artists have to be allowed to do what they want. There is a big difference between entertainment and art; great art isn't always entertaining, and great entertainment isn't always art. (Of course there are performers who are both great artists and great entertainers.)
|
Agreed. You've helped me interpret and undertsand better what I was trying to convey and sort of get my head round as I was putting it across lol! I think it came across as a bit of a rant- likely a reflection of my mood etc when typing the response- but I also can understand and acknowledge why people may get so attatched to a style/approach of an artist and, thus, why they might find it so difficult to accept when an artist deviates from that and/or moves on from it and leaves it behind them (at least, if not altogether, tempoarily or predominantly). As you rightly point out, its their whole personal cosmos in their life surrounding that music, interlaced and connected with it, that they come to associate with it, that maybe they want sustained or don't want to let go of or to end. Maybe its just me, but that doesn't upset me or threaten me as I'm all open to change, exploring new directions and ideas and of growing, expanding and evolving, personally, and secondly, I accept that this is the artist's material and career etc, and that it's their call to go where they want to artistically, his/her journey. IMO, you need to give an artist that freedom (in your own mind).
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrBenway /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Jimi Hendrix complained near the end of his life that he was sick of trying to live up to the expectations that he had created, and was looking for a new direction. In one interview he said something along the lines of being so sick of "Foxy Lady" that he felt like he would die if he had to play it one more time. We will never know where he would have taken his music, of course, but I'm sure it would have been somewhere amazing.
Dylan has never stayed still. That's why he is still relevant after all these decades, while most of his contemporaries have turned into highly-paid nostalgia acts. I think he would stop performing if he thought that was happening to him.
|
Thanks for that blurb there.
However, I am a massive fan of Hendrix and know about his life and career etc in detail after reading a biography on him [I think, if I recall correctly, written by an affiliate of Hendrix's called Mcdermott (forget first name)]. The guy has also assumed a lot of responsibility in keeping Hendrix's reputation in check and from being falsely blown out of proportion or mythisied or fabricated, posthumously, and has also played key roles in organising and managing the release of posthumous Hendrix material with Eddie Kramer. So, yes, I knew about the stress and displeasure Hendrix was feeling towards the reputation he had created in the early part of his career and of which he felt pressure to upkeep. I believe he started to feel the same way about his stage performance and the expectancy for him to be flamboyant and play with his teeth and behind his head and produce all the gyrations etc. A similar thing to the Who and their ritual of destroying their equipment at the end of shows that they then later wanted to abandon but the audience had come to expect and still demanded of them. Yes, thats one of my great melancolic ponderings! What could have Hendrix produced and given the world if only he hadn't died? Although the 2/3's-3/4's (posthumous) 'First Rays of the New Rising Sun' was excellent for the most part, fresh, dynamic, exciting, with depth, it did feel unpolished and, particulary in places, a little skeletal and disjointed. I wonder what that album would of been like and how it would of been recieved if Hendrix had lived to complete it, organise and present it as he wished/saw (obviously, this responsibility was assumed by Kramer, Mcdermott and co. when packaging it for release after Hendrix' death)?
You're right about Dylan, and I think that is such a testament to they guy, as an artist and as an individual. I highly repect that. It's great to see someone taking control of their career like that!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrBenway /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Great! Wrecking Ball is a spectacular representation of her talent, and a great place to start. Much of her other material is alt-country or rockabilly-flavored. Very early in her career, she also sang a series of duets with the legendary Gram Parsons, a true wild man and pioneering artist. I've never heard that stuff; it's a really big hole in my listening, and I should do something about it.
|
I'm giving that stuff a taste also with 'Pieces of the Sky'. I'll feedback on both and let you know what I think.