Quote:
Originally Posted by antonyfirst /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Hey Tom
How do you like the Phonak against the W3?
|
Well, that's a loaded question. I am very happy with the Phonak's overall balance, clarity, transparency (all the stuff you can read about on those threads). I have had a struggle with the Westones, mainly finding a tip that delivers the sound I expect from such a high-end IEM. I have tried everything but a couple of tin cans. But seriously, I think I have found two good options, small olives or the modded tri-flanges (stalk cut to even with the bass of the largest flange). The former still deliver a hint of sibilance, and the flanges erase that issue, but seem somewhat dark to me. My solution is to use EQ (boosting the treble a bit. The acoustic setting on my Touch does it).
Anyway, I am learning to really like (not necessarily love) the W3s, as they say in any long-term relationships, but it's gonna take time. I need to listen more now that I have settled on a couple of tip combos.
I read your extensive review on the W3s, and would like to hear your view of the Phonaks. Maybe some day.
Quick comparison, the noted mid-bass effect on the W3s is not part of the PFE experience. The PFEs are all about detail, but also have punchy, tight clean bass. But it never gets in the way of the mids and highs.
I don't have the experience nor technical knowledge to eloquently describe the W3 and PFE similarities and differences. But when you ask to compare, it's like asking me if I want to drive the Viper or the Benz. I like them both.
And now, I have that curious dynamic phone, the Monster Turbine, in my possession. Plus the X10, but I gave those to my wife because of the teeny gels (which fit her perfectly).
Not too detailed, but you get the idea on the W3 v. PFE deal.