In retrospect, yes, I could have expressed that more politely. But at the same time I wish people had been more blunt with me when I started getting into watches, so that I wouldn't have made some of the mistakes I did. I was brought up to value honesty over false facades. I won't return the favor and add you to an ignore list because that strikes me as an immature way to deal with your own problems, but you are welcome to if that protects your sensibilities.
On a side note, you are aware that an analogy is a comparison in terms of a different subject matter? It wouldn't be an analogy to say X headphone maker is the Beats of headphones; saying Invicta is the Beats of watches is a proper analogy. And you're wrong about Invictas not being fashion items. You could argue that any watch is a fashion item since people can just use their cell phones, but Invictas in particular are fashion items. They do not make their own movements and are thus not a manufacture, but instead make cases for existing movements. Like many other brands out there, they focus their efforts on the fashion of their watches rather than the workings.
