Latest Thread Images

Featured Sponsor Listings

VSonic VSD1/VSD1S Reviews/Impression Thread

Jun 10, 2013 at 2:07 PM Post #331 of 2,003
Thank you very much, Huxley!
beerchug.gif

 
Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM Post #333 of 2,003
nekromantik said:
Do the  tenore's have faster bass or do the VSD1's have faster bass?
From what I have read so far the VSD1 is good if you want thumping bass and Tenore's for airy and sub bass.
I listen to mostly 135bpm+ trance so prefer faster IEMs.

[size=1.7em] [/size]

Click to expand...


You can't really go wrong with either.

However I prefer micro-dynamics simply of their speed, sparkle and sub bass. Carbon nanotubes are made for Trance.
 
Jun 10, 2013 at 4:09 PM Post #335 of 2,003
Quote:
lifted andreas said:
You can't really go wrong with either.

However I prefer micro-dynamics simply of their speed, sparkle and sub bass. Carbon nanotubes are made for Trance.
Click to expand...

 
Just so I'm clear.. which iem's are you referring to?
 
Jun 10, 2013 at 4:16 PM Post #337 of 2,003
Quote:
lifted andreas said:
You can't really go wrong with either.

However I prefer micro-dynamics simply of their speed, sparkle and sub bass. Carbon nanotubes are made for Trance.
Click to expand...

You should probably stop generalizing about microdrivers and speed coz it's not always true. For instance, the mh1c has microdrivers and it's bass is like those slow guys that always participate in the marathon just for the accomplishment even though it takes them a day to finish it. The vc02 and  eph100 have microdrivers and also aren't exactly the fastest. The fxd70 has carbon microdrivers and isn't exactly the fastest either. So far I wouldn't link microdrivers to speed.
 
Jun 10, 2013 at 4:19 PM Post #338 of 2,003
kova4a said:
You should probably stop generalizing about microdrivers and speed coz it's not always true. For instance, the mh1c has microdrivers and it's bass is like those slow guys that always participate in the marathon just for the accomplishment even though it takes them a day to finish it. The vc02 and  eph100 have microdrivers and also aren't exactly the fastest. The fxd70 has carbon microdrivers and isn't exactly the fastest either. So far I wouldn't link microdrivers to speed.
Click to expand...


Well its kinda logical really, and not generalizing.

Just think about it, the smaller the driver the smaller distance that the vibrations have to travel from centre to the edge and so it moves faster. Hence it you get a faster kick-drum.

Its kinda simple really mate, thats why 11mm will most likely sound slower with regards to bass-kicks comparing to say a 5.8mm driver.
 
Jun 10, 2013 at 4:37 PM Post #342 of 2,003
dannybai said:
Remember housing material also.
Click to expand...


Exactly mate.

In most cases the smaller the driver the smaller the housing has to be, hence the sound waves wont have to travel as far.

Of course that all depends on where the driver is positioned.
 
Jun 10, 2013 at 4:39 PM Post #343 of 2,003
Quote:
lifted andreas said:
Well its kinda logical really, and not generalizing.

Just think about it, the smaller the driver the smaller distance that the vibrations have to travel from centre to the edge and so it moves faster. Hence it you get a faster kick-drum.

Its kinda simple really mate, thats why 11mm will most likely sound slower with regards to bass-kicks comparing to say a 5.8mm driver.
Click to expand...

Nah, the 11mm VSD1's driver is a bit  faster than the mh1c. If you really want to hear what speed really is just go with BA drivers. Aside from some faster dynamic ones like the gr07 it's not even fair to compare dynamic drivers to BA in the speed department. Even something cheap like the a161p which is single-BA makes something like the mh1c a snail in the bass department. There are pros and cons to both types but speed isn't something that dynamic drivers and microdrivers can be proud with.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top