gnarlsagan
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2011
- Posts
- 2,128
- Likes
- 247
Quote:
The reason I ask is because the way you describe the H-100 is very similar to how I would describe the FXD80, which has more detail all across the spectrum compared to the mk2. But the FR of the FXD80 is just more colored than the mk2. Even though the mids of the FXD80 are very detailed, they are a bit cold and recessed comparatively which doesn't add up to a competitive sound sig when considering totl reference sound imo.
I can understand why a person would prefer that sound, but it comes off as more of a preference than a reference.
Well H-100 are behaving differently in their mid range with different sources, more so than anything I've tried before.
Using a ipod touch 2G with them both now yes, the H-100 mids are slightly recessed compared, it's mostly vocals this is noticeable.
The reason I ask is because the way you describe the H-100 is very similar to how I would describe the FXD80, which has more detail all across the spectrum compared to the mk2. But the FR of the FXD80 is just more colored than the mk2. Even though the mids of the FXD80 are very detailed, they are a bit cold and recessed comparatively which doesn't add up to a competitive sound sig when considering totl reference sound imo.
I can understand why a person would prefer that sound, but it comes off as more of a preference than a reference.