Stuff Jones
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
- Posts
- 1,363
- Likes
- 558
I find the VE Zen 2.0 is like an open back version of the Flare R2A.
Both has very similar tonality with Zen sounding slightly warmer.
Both has equally well formed presentation with very large sound-stage (Zen is slightly wider and has better sense of air around instruments).
R2A obviously has much better isolation with well extended sub-bass. Zen's bass is very good too with awesome pace and texture.
I like Zen's more natural sounding mids (vocal tracks are especially more convincing). Timbre is slightly more accurate on Zen as well.
I also think highs are better tuned on Zen 2.0 with a good amount of sparkle and detail... R2A's high is little too polite in comparison.
On the plus side, I can listen to R2A almost 5+ hours non stop without getting any listeners fatigue.
Both are pretty hard to drive and amping benefits them greatly (I used Aune B1)
I would personally rate Zen 2.0: 9.3 vs R2A 9.2 sonically. (references: JH Angie: 10, FLC8S: 9.4, Pinnacle P1: 9.1)
Comfort wise R2A is probably top 3 of all IEMs I have ever tried. Zen is also pretty comfortable but finicky with a fit (slight off angle causes hazy centre imaging)
Thanks! Sounds like an open version of the R2Pros then, which to my ears have better mids resolution and treble extension then the R2As.