V-MODA M-100: Discussion/Feedback, Reviews, Pics, etc.
Dec 12, 2013 at 3:53 PM Post #17,791 of 23,366
  Has anyone used their M-100's with the Astell & Kern AK100 ?  Did they pair well?  Is an external amp needed?  I posted similar question over in the AK100 Thread, thought I might get more responses here.
 
Thanks for any input?

No amp need, but again I have the AK120 but amp wise should be the same.
 
Dec 12, 2013 at 6:04 PM Post #17,796 of 23,366
  Yeah, I new about the AK100 MK2, but don't want to spend the extra $100 if not needed.  I don't use super sensitive IEM's, for that matter, I don't use IEM's period.
 
Thanks.

In this case you do, as the old one has a 21 ohms input impedance, which is too high for the M-100.
 
Dec 12, 2013 at 6:24 PM Post #17,797 of 23,366
Just spotted the M-100 in White Silver at the beginning of the Gay Pride Parade scene in "Blue is the Warmest Color."
 
Dec 12, 2013 at 7:35 PM Post #17,798 of 23,366
I messed up when I bought my m100's. I got the pearl white with red shields.  I should go back to the stock shields but there kind of a pain to take out and put another set of shields on.  The red and white aren't very manly looking.
 
Dec 12, 2013 at 9:59 PM Post #17,801 of 23,366
In this case you do, as the old one has a 21 ohms input impedance, which is too high for the M-100.


Thanks, again, DrSheep. That was more the answer I was looking for. I knew there was some issues between the AK100 and low impedance earphones/headphones; just wasn't sure if 32ohm was too low. I think I will just pocket my holiday bonus and stick with my iBasso DX50, which has served me well with no issues. Just kinda wanted to try the AK100.
 
Dec 13, 2013 at 5:29 AM Post #17,802 of 23,366
Dec 13, 2013 at 7:28 AM Post #17,803 of 23,366
Thanks, again, DrSheep. That was more the answer I was looking for. I knew there was some issues between the AK100 and low impedance earphones/headphones; just wasn't sure if 32ohm was too low. I think I will just pocket my holiday bonus and stick with my iBasso DX50, which has served me well with no issues. Just kinda wanted to try the AK100.

Wait for used AK120 when CES2014 rolls around when they announced the new AK140 or whatever.
 
Dec 13, 2013 at 10:53 AM Post #17,804 of 23,366
Thanks, again, DrSheep. That was more the answer I was looking for. I knew there was some issues between the AK100 and low impedance earphones/headphones; just wasn't sure if 32ohm was too low. I think I will just pocket my holiday bonus and stick with my iBasso DX50, which has served me well with no issues. Just kinda wanted to try the AK100.

Personally, I feel like there is a lot of room for improvement in the usability department for the AK100/AK120.  They sound great, but the screen sucks and software is nothing to write home about.  They are also excessively priced, IMO, even for an audiophile part.  Consider a 64GB iPod touch as a competitive product.  I wouldn't expect it to be nearly twice the price.  Sure, there are benefits from an audio quality standpoint, but there are also many drawbacks.  I feel like they are charging for those benefits, and ignoring the obvious shortcomings.  I think $500 for the AK100 would be reasonable.  Maybe $700 for the AK120.  The current pricing is just too aggressive, in a bad way.  This is especially true when you consider that the company making them is known for their VERY inexpensive players.  
 
Sorry for the OT rant.  I really love the fact that someone is putting together a quality iPod alternative for audiophiles.  I just hope they develop a desire to actually compete.  
smily_headphones1.gif
 
 
Dec 13, 2013 at 11:06 AM Post #17,805 of 23,366
Remember, the EXACT same thing can be said about any Ferrari, but there are no shortage of people lining up to buy the 458.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top