qusp
Member of the Trade: Twisted Cables
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Posts
- 7,743
- Likes
- 62
tested via optical and coax both from my G5 and actually from the RME itself. both as dac/amp and also with both amps feeding my Lisa III. like this I was able to have .
so tested
iriver->ibasso D10
very nice output, but lacks the air and slight organic edge of the lisa III amp section. although with burn-in and my latest set of op-amps, im getting a little closer SQ wise, but still lags behind in sheer power and authority.
iriver->D10->Lisa III (this is my every day portable combo if I have my bag)
wow, i've never heard portable audio sound this detailed. with W3, its very involving.. I missed my bus stop the other night and ended up 10 minutes up the road before I realized.
DIYMOD 5.5G-> teflon VCAP dock->D10
nothing to be sneezed at either and with these op-amps its actually not worse, for the same reason I prefer the D10 HP out, to the HP out on my 9632 for shear musical involvement and musicality. the DIYMOD is technically inferior to the external dac rig, but there are still some types of music I prefer it with; for example it sounds better with my SE530 and rock than the D10 rig does.
9632->D10 via optical
G5->(optical)D10
G5->(optical) D10->Lisa III
9632->optical->D10->Lisa III
RME->HP out
RME->Lisa III via jena/cryo silver RCA (analogue)
RME->D10 (analogue)
I didnt bother via USB as I find it to be inferior. this wasnt an oprganized test; more like extensive listening durig burn-in
the DAC spec on the RME is better no question, but its just not as enjoyable and I actually find the soundstage with the D10 fed from the RME then to Lisa superb. the RME has a really great clock and supplies a really nice sounding digital output. so much better than the iriver. I find with rolled op-amps in the D10 that I can achieve more the sound I like; where as i'm stuck with the RME sound sig of the 9632 headamp that is.
when using the D10 as dac only to lisa III it loses out to the RME used the same way, but not by a huge margin. the RME is technically superior in almost every way, But I think you got defensive before actually reading what I wrote
y as a dac, but rthe HP out is a bit disappointing compared to the other 2 options here; and thats no surprize as the RME is designed to be as flat as possible, although I dont find the RME gear to be as dry as some pro audio gear.
Quote:
I just find the D10 to be more involving and musical than the RME is. and if I want full-on high-rez audio I have my RME Fireface 400. the D10 dac chip is the same as the D2, but the amp section is miles ahead IMO and it seems some respcted reviewers have agreed and with LMH4032 and AD8656, the SQ is really very good.
so tested
iriver->ibasso D10
very nice output, but lacks the air and slight organic edge of the lisa III amp section. although with burn-in and my latest set of op-amps, im getting a little closer SQ wise, but still lags behind in sheer power and authority.
iriver->D10->Lisa III (this is my every day portable combo if I have my bag)
wow, i've never heard portable audio sound this detailed. with W3, its very involving.. I missed my bus stop the other night and ended up 10 minutes up the road before I realized.
DIYMOD 5.5G-> teflon VCAP dock->D10
nothing to be sneezed at either and with these op-amps its actually not worse, for the same reason I prefer the D10 HP out, to the HP out on my 9632 for shear musical involvement and musicality. the DIYMOD is technically inferior to the external dac rig, but there are still some types of music I prefer it with; for example it sounds better with my SE530 and rock than the D10 rig does.
9632->D10 via optical
G5->(optical)D10
G5->(optical) D10->Lisa III
9632->optical->D10->Lisa III
RME->HP out
RME->Lisa III via jena/cryo silver RCA (analogue)
RME->D10 (analogue)
I didnt bother via USB as I find it to be inferior. this wasnt an oprganized test; more like extensive listening durig burn-in
the DAC spec on the RME is better no question, but its just not as enjoyable and I actually find the soundstage with the D10 fed from the RME then to Lisa superb. the RME has a really great clock and supplies a really nice sounding digital output. so much better than the iriver. I find with rolled op-amps in the D10 that I can achieve more the sound I like; where as i'm stuck with the RME sound sig of the 9632 headamp that is.
when using the D10 as dac only to lisa III it loses out to the RME used the same way, but not by a huge margin. the RME is technically superior in almost every way, But I think you got defensive before actually reading what I wrote
y as a dac, but rthe HP out is a bit disappointing compared to the other 2 options here; and thats no surprize as the RME is designed to be as flat as possible, although I dont find the RME gear to be as dry as some pro audio gear.
Quote:
Originally Posted by qusp the D10 DAC equals or betters the performance of my secondary audio card RME HAMMERFALL 9632 at least for driving headphones anyway. |
I just find the D10 to be more involving and musical than the RME is. and if I want full-on high-rez audio I have my RME Fireface 400. the D10 dac chip is the same as the D2, but the amp section is miles ahead IMO and it seems some respcted reviewers have agreed and with LMH4032 and AD8656, the SQ is really very good.