Lindskog
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Posts
- 102
- Likes
- 14
My JH16A (Not FP) sounds much better with the 3A amp then with Portaphilo 627 out of my CLAS.
My JH16A (Not FP) sounds much better with the 3A amp then with Portaphilo 627 out of my CLAS.
Ok here is what I hear .
First off the jh3a jh16 combo not the same but in some ways it's is.
With the amp and useing spidif coax or a external USB to coax like halide . The sound has more ambience , more space between instramints and in some ways more clear and precise.
If I use them without the amp I can get really close but useing about 5 k in electronics.
As for the pp6. The cross connect is not availible as of yet . So only the DAC/ amp box may be used . So as I do beleave there is something to be gained I cannot say without the cable.
Foot note the jh in ref is the freq phase
I also own a pair of jh16 all new drivers from JH. And rescelled at UM . I can say they sound great but not the same as the combo freq phase . But I can only here the difference when A/B testing its hard for me to tell from my memory . I'm just not that good at it. But there is a difference . The same as I said above. So in the end I think the pp6 is a good value based on not needing an amp or DAC. The same for JH . But this is just my opinion
AL D
As you can se AL things it takes "5k in electronics" to get close to what the 3A do with JH 16. But then you have to consider if you like the signature of the JH16 also. But I think when you get both the FP (for phase correction when use without the amp) and the amp for super phase correction, it is a good deal since I use my JH16 at least 50% on the go without the amp. I don't have FP though
Has UM come out with the cross connect cable for the pp6 . they said they would mail it to me when released but as of this writing no cable .