B[van]
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2008
- Posts
- 547
- Likes
- 22
Quote:
Cable for cable (ES), IEM for IEM (Quad TF10 vs Mage), the quantity of bass on the Quads TF10 is more than the Mage.
I had a PM before, asking for my opinions on the bass of the Quad tfi10s against EBs and a 2-300 hour Atrios. I personally felt the quantity of the bass of the reshelled quad tf10 is in between the EB and Atrios, but if you chose the ES cable the sound somehow feels a little muddy. Impact of bass I'd say EB, Atrio and then the remolded quad.
If we factor in the mage,
quantity = Quads
quality = The mage doesn't go as low as you would like, but there wasn't any 'boomy'ness or muddyness.
impact = I really can't rmbr this, but the quads seemed to do reproduce the bass more efficiently.
Again this is just my personal take. No offense if my post irks anyone's displeasure here. I was using a iPod Touch 2g, crystal lod and a predator during the test. My genres are mainly Jpop, country and rock.
Originally Posted by chaosfayt /img/forum/go_quote.gif Hey |
Cable for cable (ES), IEM for IEM (Quad TF10 vs Mage), the quantity of bass on the Quads TF10 is more than the Mage.
I had a PM before, asking for my opinions on the bass of the Quad tfi10s against EBs and a 2-300 hour Atrios. I personally felt the quantity of the bass of the reshelled quad tf10 is in between the EB and Atrios, but if you chose the ES cable the sound somehow feels a little muddy. Impact of bass I'd say EB, Atrio and then the remolded quad.
If we factor in the mage,
quantity = Quads
quality = The mage doesn't go as low as you would like, but there wasn't any 'boomy'ness or muddyness.
impact = I really can't rmbr this, but the quads seemed to do reproduce the bass more efficiently.
Again this is just my personal take. No offense if my post irks anyone's displeasure here. I was using a iPod Touch 2g, crystal lod and a predator during the test. My genres are mainly Jpop, country and rock.