TURNTABLE SETUP Questions thread - don't start a new thread, ASK YOUR QUESTION HERE!
Sep 2, 2013 at 9:46 PM Post #1,591 of 3,585
Hello, I was wondering how much a diamond stylus could potentially cost.
 
EDIT: I would want a diamond stylus as it is the hardest material known to man so it shouldn't wear out as fast as styli made of other materials but another thing I would like to know that I forgot to include in my original post is: would a diamond stylus be gentle to my records and not damage them?
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 9:57 PM Post #1,592 of 3,585
There are diamond stylus cartridges between $30 and $10,000. Can you be more specific about what you are looking for?
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:22 PM Post #1,593 of 3,585
There are diamond stylus cartridges between $30 and $10,000. Can you be more specific about what you are looking for?


Thank you for your swift response . . . technically I am not currently looking for anything yet as I am trying to save my money for some college education. I just wanted to know these things for when I am able to spare some money. Thank you for your time.
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 11:39 PM Post #1,594 of 3,585
Quote:
Thank you for your swift response . . . technically I am not currently looking for anything yet as I am trying to save my money for some college education . . . I just wanted to know these things for when I am able to spare some money. Thank you for your time.

Diamond stylus is probably the most expensive material known. If you want the best, it takes natural and not human made diamond, it has to be grain oriented if it is to wear slowest/last longest - which means that there will be more diamond wasted in cutting/grinding process than if cut/grind to have best volumetric yield. The more the stylus tip approaches that of the cutting stylus, the more trouble there is in making that shape. The smaller the actual stone is, the harder to make it made right. And/or to mount it properly on the cantilever.
 
Diamond is not exactly cheapest material known - yet all of the above can FAR outstrip the cost of the raw material. In best styli ( the physically smallest and of the most advanced stylus tip profiles made to the tightest tolerances ) it is next to invisible in the final cost. 
 
Want proof ? Take a good microscope, compare side to side Van den Hul stylus tip profiles from any other manufacturer, Van den Hul included, and that from Audio Note IO cartridge. It is a VdH stylus made in Japan ( most likely but not positively confirmed by Namiki ) - and it looks in real life just as good as others do on paper or "photoshoped" images.
 
Its only disadvantage - PRICE !
 
Shure once did give a rough estimate how much a pound ( or kilogram, can not remember ) of finished diamond styli costs. It was a mind boggling figure, above what mere mortals can ever hope to earn in a lifetime. Given the small weight per stylus, that amount would make MANY cartridges and last a really long time for the manufacturer to use up, 
 
I do not want to disclose the actual cost per single stylus cartridge manufacturer has to pay to the stylus manufacturer. It is one of the most closely guarded and generally kept in confidence information. But you can "guesstimate" it from the costs of the retippers - a really good diamond stylus stone alone can cost more than many complete cartridges.
 
Sep 3, 2013 at 12:30 AM Post #1,595 of 3,585
As far as I know damage to your records when only talking about the stylus would be mainly a function of the diamond profile.  Obviously assuming a perfectly set up cartridge/table.
 
I have spherical, elliptical and line-contact/micro-ridge carts of varying quality and each has its use for recording, listening, mixing or even scratching.  I don't know if there is an inherent longevity that comes with any specific style of diamond cut.  It would depend on how it was being implemented and used.
 
Hope that helps,
Hi-Five
 
Sep 3, 2013 at 12:52 AM Post #1,596 of 3,585
Quote:
As far as I know damage to your records when only talking about the stylus would be mainly a function of the diamond profile.  Obviously assuming a perfectly set up cartridge/table.
 
I have spherical, elliptical and line-contact/micro-ridge carts of varying quality and each has its use for recording, listening, mixing or even scratching.  I don't know if there is an inherent longevity that comes with any specific style of diamond cut.  It would depend on how it was being implemented and used.
 
Hope that helps,
Hi-Five

There is longevity involved in stylus cut. One factor is the material itself ( from powder remaining during diamond grinding compressed back into stylus shape to grain oriented natural diamond ),
the other tip geometry itself. Micro Ridge is the toughest to wear out, as it for all practical purposes retains its shape with wear, unlike any other tip geometry. Various estimates regarding how many hours of acceptable reproduction is available from Micro XY ( Line, Ridge, Reach, SAS , perhaps other commercial names ) have been given, from Audio Technica's 1000 hours before there is a loss at 20 kHz of - 1 dB in right and -2 dB in left channel at the inner grooves, or Jico's 500 hours before certain distortion levels are exceeded. Both are much better than any other shape used for any comparable amount of time - specially anything approaching 1000 hours mark.
 
I concur there are uses for all above mentioned styli - records we have have been made throughout the time  on many different machines and it is impossible to get the best from all of them with a single stylus shape.
 
Sep 3, 2013 at 3:14 PM Post #1,597 of 3,585
@Skylab: I'm surprised that there are diamond styli that cost only $30 . . . are those styli that are not made completely out of diamond but rather diamond tipped like Ion claims they do with their stylus line-up? If so, please note that I would only be interested in styli that are crafted from diamond not merely diamond tipped.
 
@analogsurviver: thank you for going into such detail about which types of diamond styli I should look for.
 
Sep 3, 2013 at 4:29 PM Post #1,598 of 3,585
You are asking about just the stylus, yes? The tiny diamond stylus is at the tip of the cantilever which is never diamond.
 
Sep 3, 2013 at 6:34 PM Post #1,600 of 3,585
Well, even the "lowly" Red Ed cartridge has a Elliptical .007X.003 diamond stylus. It's $27.95.
 
Sep 3, 2013 at 7:27 PM Post #1,601 of 3,585
Well, even the "lowly" Red Ed cartridge has a Elliptical .007X.003 diamond stylus. It's $27.95.

I see. I guess it actually makes sense that you can find styli made of diamond for so little money as styli are so tiny.
 
Sep 3, 2013 at 9:15 PM Post #1,602 of 3,585
That's it exactly. They are TINY. And they are industrial diamonds, not jewelry diamonds anyway.
 
Sep 3, 2013 at 10:00 PM Post #1,603 of 3,585

Shure M97xe
 

Shure V15VxMR
 

Shure M97xe
 

Shure V15VxMR
 

Shure M97xe
 

Shure V15VxMR
 

Shure M97xe
 

Shure V15VxMR
 
The magnification is the same for all respective photos.
 
V15VxMR  was approx 3 - 4 times the price of M97xe when new and still available. Current NOS - see ebay ...
 
Although most diamonds used for styli are industrial, premium grade is natural or jewelry grade.
 
Red Ed ( actually a Japanese made cart, usually branded Sanyo MG 27 ) stylus should be larger than Shure M97e - with styli, less IS most definitely more, and when you add better stylus tip profile, better tolerance, smaller diamond, natural instead of industrial - costs start spillaring.
 
In styli, each and every rafinement is paid with solid cold hard ca$h.
 
Quote:
  I see. I guess it actually makes sense that you can find styli made of diamond for so little money as styli are so tiny.

 
Sep 4, 2013 at 10:29 PM Post #1,604 of 3,585
I have had a B&O 4002 since the 70's. Rebuilt once at S*****smith. I am thinking of adding a second one as a backup. There is also a N.O.S. B&O  9000
available. My question is, are the innards on a rebuilt 4002 better than a brand new 9000?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top