"Earpotatoes", big size, big musicality
Impressive stereo image stability, among other things, this i3
Impressive stereo image stability, among other things, this i3
Last edited:
Hi!
Well they sound great without anything with 9038s.
i havent done much with pdv2 with them or even tried to eq the tri. and dindt use p1 for a long while now..
I actually dondt like any IEMs at home and dondt bother with them. so i cant give much advice.
Tri i3 are ear potatoes from the size but mobile they have such a pleasant sound without any need for tweaking. Very impressive for what i would use iems for
Tri audio i3 is a very good sounding iem, I've posted my impression at the other post:
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/tri-earphone-impressions-currently-i4-and-i3.921113/post-15464009
However, frequency response of two channels seems a little bit different than each others..
some things strange happen at 1k~1.5k area, although it is still very good sounding iem to me subjectively.
and than I figure it out the reason behind this...
A gap found at the edge of mmcx socket will shift the dip of the frequency response to the higher frequency.
correct the frequency response by blocking the gap at mmcx socket
after the correction: sound more refined and more "correct" now, this is a super good sounding iem to me !!
I didn't see a socket gap on mine.
It is also easy to have an optical illusion of one due to the curved reflective metal shell.
As I had doubts about what I saw I decided to test this by pushing a post it note by its corner to where the gap would be. Turns out my all 3 sets of the I3 do have the gap and I was being too critical of my own eyesight.
Great find. So it would be better to tape both gaps in both IEM so it would avoid leak in frequency!About the mmcx socket gap issue of Tri i3 that i posted on the other thread...