Chodorovski
Head-Fier
The difference is that Hifiman, Audeze and Focal are profitable (I presume, although we don't know because they are privately owned). Survival is about cash flow. Tidal is losing money. All of the streaming services are losing money, but the major players (Spotify, Apple, Google, Amazon) are well funded. Market share is crucial for Tidal because they need it to convince investors to inject cash, and to be attractive as an acquisition target.
I feel like (and I could be totally wrong) that Tidal is the kind of company that could be profitable if they weren't trying to fight the big fight for marketshare against spotify, apple and google. Like, receive monthly fees from users, pay royalties + server costs + a few devs and a little marketing. That should be feasible, right? I can imagine now they're dumping money at certain rappers to get exclusives and various other stunts to get attention. Like just because Uber is spending billions more than they make to monopolize the taxi industry doesn't mean that all taxis in the world have to lose money.
Like Tidal isn't in the same boat as all these "free" apps and social media platforms that need enormous mass appeal in order to exist at all. They have some number, still in the 6-figures (?) of people paying $10-$20 a month
That being said, maybe they can't sustain the contracts with record labels without enough userbase, I don't know.