Hi Daniel!
As always, thank you for taking the time to share all those excellent explanations! I’ve learnt so much reading your posts throughout the years! You genuinely rock!
I’m in no way expert in the field and am curious in knowing more on the subject , so I hope you guys can correct me if I’m saying nonsense!
Maybe I have the wrong idea about what note weight truly is, but I would relate it in some way to the physicality of the notes?! Therefore, I’m surprised you guys didn’t mention the attack of notes, as I feel it is as important (if not more so) to the perception of note impact and weight as decay is.
Also, from your previous message you were saying that note weight is closely linked to mid bass. Does that mean note weight in the upper mids or trebles area doesn’t exist? I’m asking that because for example, I’m finding Ragnar‘s top end to have more substance and “weight “ to its notes than Annihilator for instance, that I feel more ethereal and light weight in its presentation. I would also mostly attribute this palpable sense to the attack of the notes that are sharper and more vivid on Ragnar. Maybe I’m confusing different things, I’m not sure…
For the drivers’ diaphragms and toms you were referring to, I think the amount of the membrane’s displacement is also a big factor to take into account. For instance, most planar drivers in IEMs are bigger than their DD counterparts but since the amplitude of their membranes’ displacement (as well as the weight of the membrane ) is lower they generally don’t produce the same sensation.
I might have spewed utter nonsense and mixed a lot of things up, so I hope you guys can help clear things up!
Cheers,
Julien
Thanks, man! ‘Always love reading your impressions as well.
Yeah, as I said on my initial reply, when I think of
note weight, the first thing that comes to mind is how physically present or tactile the note is. It’s that cliche of, “It’s as if I can reach out and touch the instruments.” That’s what good note weight does. It makes instruments feel rooted in reality and
real. To your point about attack, I think it’s virtually interchangeable with how I’ve talked about impact on my recent posts. The more weighty, more realized and more tactile a note is, the realer or punchier its attack will feel, which then also feeds into the IEM’s overall dynamics.
Weight certainly exists in the upper registers, and what you’re talking about there is a perfect example of why I personally don’t prefer EST trebles nowadays. I still prefer the more tangible highs of a BA, especially now that they aren’t as randomly peaky or harmonic as they used to be. If I had to have EST highs, I’d prefer a combination of a BA for the low- and mid-trebles, then ESTs cover the upper-treble or air frequencies, ‘cus air is
meant to be light and dainty. The reason why I specifically used lower-end examples when talking about note weight here is simply because it’s easier to explain and visualize, like with the drum example.
And, where I talked about mid-bass, I’m actually referring to it as a way to get “fake” weight; to make notes seem heavier by simply making them fatter or thicker. In reality, that’s as much of a cheat as throwing in extra treble for detail. So, it wasn’t a
real example of note weight; in fact, the very opposite. And, yes, driver excursion and air displacement are products of the size and weight of the diaphragm as well. I didn’t call them out specifically as I assumed that was implied, but you’re right on the money there.
Personaly I dont see the co relation between DD BA and Planar and thier sterotipical decay times. There are DD like A4/5000, FD7, 3T-154 that are very dry and have quick decay times and generally follow recording decay. Open sonion BAs form the likes of BGVP DM8(im sure there are others but this comes to mind) have extended decay dispite being a BA. For planars like the hook X and pandamon granted they arent as extreme as open BAs but they introduced notable decay.
@drftr if you dont mind is at a live performance code for sounds like PA speakers? Since when I think of live performance I think of non powered accoustically venue ampified sound.
That being said on the headphone side of thing I feel that its always so slow to get interesting products. The only thing that appeals to me as of last year was the Tago t3-01, FiiO FT3 and beyer 900 X.
I agree. I feel like it’s more down to the size and weight (and magnet strength, etc.) of the driver, rather than how much they decay. Again, the decay to me is another
effect, rather than the
cause.
I was just thinking about the PA system thing too, actually. It’s possible that our brain accepts DDs as a more realistic facsimile of live instruments because concert PA systems are basically giant DDs. On the other hand, ribbon tweeters used in studio monitors are closer to BAs and ESTs in IEMs.