But what if we could get all the Singaporean IEM manufacturers here, along with a sprinkling of esoteric Japanese IEM manufacturers?![]()
A mini CanJam just for Watercoolers along with them manufacturers would be a dream come true
But what if we could get all the Singaporean IEM manufacturers here, along with a sprinkling of esoteric Japanese IEM manufacturers?![]()
That's a really cool initiative! A bit too busy right now but I'll definitely consider it this summer.Lol I think there are precisely 3 decent audio shops in this whole vast country as far as portable goes-- 2 in Toronto and one in Vancouver.
Tour thread is here:
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/wat...ails-see-second-post-for-active-tours.960012/
Yeah, let's do it in Hawaii.A mini CanJam just for Watercoolers along with them manufacturers would be a dream come true
How I am thinking about it, regardless of price just based on how it sounds.
MidFi = good enjoyable to listen to, just not over the top incredible.
MidFi Wannabe = not enjoyable to listen to, though is trying to be, another way to describe “half baked”.
Like I said I am at a loss, we do not all hear the same or have the same preferences. Mentor though for me is a real head scratcher as that is inadequate to describe the large chasm between what I heard and others describe. Leading me to fall back on synergy plus preferences compounding a less than enjoyable listen.
I'm somewhere down the middle. I think Mentor is technically very impressive, though not across the board. Stage is smaller than several other IEMs I've heard, and one way of getting it wider is with a lighter, airier source, which pushes its already very average bass response further back. It's resolving for sure, but can also be a touch bright, and unless you get a very deep fit, treble can be too strident for my liking.I concur. I mean, the timber and soundstage width all sounded great, but for me personally, the treble was pushed a little too forward and it seemed to take some of the air from between instruments. I felt like that also caused them to lose some depth in the soundstage. Coincidentally I did most of my listening through the P6 Pro as well, although I also used a 1Z with a C9 amp, with no real change in those issues. I really did like it, but didn't love it. Could be source synergy or just my "old man" ears missing something.![]()
Someone asked a bit ago, so forgive my cut and paste.No reason to ponder letting them go-- they are still at the summit imho.
How would you compare Phonix Vs. Traillii?
Thank you very much, Scubi. OrderedOn Amazon US -
tomtoc Electronic Organizer Accessory Tech Pouch for MacBook Charger, Cables, Power Bank, Hard Drive, Travel Cords, Water-resistant Storage Bag with Removable Card Slots for USB Adapter, Memory Card (Navy Blue)
https://a.co/d/fvQ9rvH
But what if we could get all the Singaporean IEM manufacturers here, along with a sprinkling of esoteric Japanese IEM manufacturers?![]()
IMHO, I think even though many people think that the sound style of Traillii and PHX/PHX LE is similar or different, we should not ignore the more fundamental problem of unit configuration. The PHX with 13 BA units is a very successful tuning template. I think it is very difficult for an IEM with all BA units to completely surpass the VE13. The integration of VE13 is very good, and the sound is wonderful enough. However, the existence of the electrostatic unit will undoubtedly cause a significant difference in the sense of energy between the high frequency and the mid frequency of the Traillii. The golden partner PWAudio FTS will undoubtedly further improve Traillii on the original cable 1960s, so that the horizontal soundstage can be greatly improved and more details can be provided. I think the best way is to actually experience the difference between the two.No reason to ponder letting them go-- they are still at the summit imho.
How would you compare Phonix Vs. Traillii?
IMHO, I think even though many people think that the sound style of Traillii and PHX/PHX LE is similar or different, we should not ignore the more fundamental problem of unit configuration. The PHX with 13 BA units is a very successful tuning template. I think it is very difficult for an IEM with all BA units to completely surpass the VE13. The integration of VE13 is very good, and the sound is wonderful enough. However, the existence of the electrostatic unit will undoubtedly cause a significant difference in the sense of energy between the high frequency and the mid frequency of the Traillii. The golden partner PWAudio FTS will undoubtedly further improve Traillii on the original cable 1960s, so that the horizontal soundstage can be greatly improved and more details can be provided. I think the best way is to actually experience the difference between the two.
Both can be technically true, but it's also likely a marketing lie, too.I thought they claim its because those additional features will take away from their music-only design.
But what if we could get all the Singaporean IEM manufacturers here, along with a sprinkling of esoteric Japanese IEM manufacturers?![]()
Because both Erlkönig and PHX are IEMs composed of 13 BA units, I will simply call them VE13. I think you must know that Erlkönig has four different tuning mods, among which mode 2 is the most popular. I think the tuning of the PHX (including the all-black PHX limited to Hong Kong) is closer to mode 2. The tuning style of PHX LE is closer to Mode 1 and Mode 3, which correspond to bass and treble enhancement respectively (or a combination of 2 and 3). In fact, I think the difference in the material of the cavity will have an impact on the sound. In fact, my favorite is the silver Erlkönig, not the black limited edition.I agree that driver config is of preeminent importance-- at least as important as FR in my experience.
What is the VE13? Was that a colloquial name for the Phonix a la VE's naming convention in other BA IEMs?
Also, you've got one of the more jaw dropping sigs I've encountered yet. Lots of amazing IEMs. Just out of curiosity-- my off the cuff impression hearing them both (albeit briefly) left me with the impression that Phonix LE was much closer to Erlkonig than the OG Phonix-- would you agree with that?
Sharing some Traillii Ti picturesWould love to grab a pair!
Cable is PW1960s 4 wire according to HK resellers.
![]()
Because both Erlkönig and PHX are IEMs composed of 13 BA units, I will simply call them VE13. I think you must know that Erlkönig has four different tuning mods, among which mode 2 is the most popular. I think the tuning of the PHX (including the all-black PHX limited to Hong Kong) is closer to mode 2. The tuning style of PHX LE is closer to Mode 1 and Mode 3, which correspond to bass and treble enhancement respectively (or a combination of 2 and 3). In fact, I think the difference in the material of the cavity will have an impact on the sound. In fact, my favorite is the silver Erlkönig, not the black limited edition.
For USD 8,520.71 you can try hereHow do you even buy one?