The Watercooler -- Impressions, philosophical discussion and general banter. Index on first page. All welcome.

May 26, 2025 at 10:45 AM Post #107,176 of 107,291
Hope everyone is well, was going to make a post with impressions from High End Munich. I did put it on hold so I could finish two reviews, first out is UM Mest Jet Black. Fourth generation in the Mest series, similarly to its predecessor it is a quite technical and impressive set. I enjoy it a lot, but it can also sound to intense at times so I find it even more important to find correct source and accessories.

And Jet Black is a classy looking set with black ceramic shell and golden screws, it looks and feel very premium versus typical resin shells. I also really like that both stock cables are of good quality, though I bet this raises the price more. So we are lucky to have stores like @MusicTeck that sell it without the stock cables for less.
Can read all my thoughts in the review if that's interesting, cheers :beerchug:

REVIEW HERE

DSCF8025.jpg
 
May 26, 2025 at 12:39 PM Post #107,177 of 107,291
Had the chance to put together the impressions from today on the train ride from London to Paris

I basically crammed two years worth of releases in two hours, so please take these impressions with a grain of salt. I would consider this more of a selection process for IEMs I’d like to revisit rather than final judgements

For the sake of simplicity, I used Eletech eartips (in two sizes) for all IEMs because they fit me extremely well, and it will provide some consistency for the impressions. I got a good seal and fit for all IEMs in these impressions

The SP3000M is the default source for all impressions in this list. I would describe it as mildly warm and very textured and smooth, if you’d like to correct for it.

Once again, a big big thank you to Elise for having me. Even more so considering today was a bank holiday in London

1. General impressions

IEMs have gotten really, really good. The sound quality on IEMs at all kinds of price points has gotten so high that I feel like differentiation is one of the main challenges for manufacturers.

A lot of IEMs sounded spectacular, and would be stone cold killers a few years ago, but competition is so high right now, it takes something extraordinary to really grab my attention.

That creates the opposite issue, where some IEMs work so hard to be distinctive, that they end up overdoing it in the wrong direction and end up sounding weird or wonky, and not in a good way

Unrelated, but I gravitated really well to the APX SE. The honeymoon has worn off, and I'd still take it over basically anything I heard today except maybe HEX.

2. Lee (Elysian and Mysticraft)

The HEX was the big star of the show for me. It is bold, with massive bass, incredible texture all around, exceptional treble tuning that manages to always sound clear and exciting, but never sibilant or unpleasant. I’ve never heard an IEM that sounded so distinctive, but manages to sound so good with literally anything I play on it

I guess I’d describe the sound as an L shape. It wasn’t forward enough in the midrange and treble to call it a W or a V shape, but the bass is also super clean so it never really interferes with the clarity and detail

In terms of chain modifications, I’d like to try some thinner and brighter cables (Euclid comes to mind), and maybe a more neutral source just to see what comes out of it

I loved how well it scales down. It sounds incredible off Apple dongle just as it does off my SP3000M, and a DACamp that Ahmed let me try. I really appreciate that it is easy to drive, and even more how unpretentious it is when it comes down to synergy

I knew I loved it in the first 2 minutes, told myself I wouldn’t listen to it any more to give time to other IEMs, but ended up trying it again and again.

Only gripe is the soundstage is a little narrower than I’d like. It’s not narrow, it’s just not flagship width like the Moses or APX SE.

I also tried the Annihilator 2023, which I liked a lot more than the 2021. It’s a bit like a less refined HEX, that edged on sibilance at times even though it had less treble overall. Amazing bass, great treble, slightly “Lee” mids with that upper midrange tilt. Not too bad though

Tried the Elise Elysian X, which is supposed to have more bass compared to the X I tried years ago. It has actual punch and mid bass presence. A hint too energetic in the upper midrange, but it’s a really respectable IEM, that had amazing clarity, detail and technicals. Would consider owning it to be honest, it’s one of the IEMs that positively surprised me the most, and is kind of sort of living in my head rent free right now

I will wait for Lee’s quadbrid and I might ask Elise to maybe let me spend like a week or whatever with the X to decide if I want to jump on one

The Mysticraft tribrid was just awful. HEX bass but didn’t achieve the same texture or separation, with a super scooped and upper-tilted upper midrange. Thin and shouty. I scrolled through a few songs really quickly, but it was just an instant pass for me

3. Storm with Sovereign 2w

This is one I was really excited to listen to, but was left very slightly underwhelmed.

Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s a great IEM, but it just didn’t do anything that was so crazy that would have me justify the cost over my custom A12t

I liked that the Storm was basically a “blank slate,” waiting for you to decide what you want it to sound like with your source.

I liked it with the Nipo N2, hated it off that huge modded iBasso (I found it extremely bright and clinical). I think people also exaggerate how hard it is to drive, because it sounded excellent off the SP3000M, and it wasn’t so far behind the Nipo N2 (which is supposed to be really powerful so I guess it can drive the Storm to most of its potential)

I understand the appeal of the IEM, especially for headphone audiophiles who already have crazy setups that are just waiting for a Storm, but it didn’t do anything so special for me to justify the cost, especially compared to other reference monitors (I consider the ability to be easily driven and scaling down advantages)

Purely subjective, but I would personally prefer IEMs that are a little more distinctive at that price range. I’m happy with the A12t sounding a little generic at 2000$, but not so much with something at the Storm’s price

I like the APX SE much better, it’s easier to drive and I feel like it has a more unique take on “reference”

Again though, I kinda get it and I respect the IEM. Can’t say anything truly negative about it. Will revisit

4. Macbeth

Not just the best BA bass I’ve heard, but some of the best bass quality I’ve heard out of any IEM.

I don’t want to say too much about the Macbeth, mostly because I want to try and create a specific chain around it to see how much I can fine tune the sound. It sounded weirdly thin, sibilant and metallic with some tracks, but like a completely different IEM with others

I don’t think I’ve experienced finding an IEM both too warm and pleasant, and too bright and harsh almost at the same time. I guess it has some really specific treble peaks that specific tracks hit

Definitely one to revisit and experiment with.

5. FiR Rn6 and Project K


Loved the Rn6, not so much the Project K. The Rn6 completely deserves all the praise it has gotten so far. It’s the most balanced FiR by a mile, with a clear but unobtrusive and textured midrange, exceptional kinetic bass and really well extended, gentle treble

Didn’t focus on technical ability too much cause I was running low on time and I already knew I wanted to give it another go. It’s excellent.

Project K… It’s a mess. It has the Xe6 bass, with fat and thick lower mids, but then it has this weird peak in the midrange that makes it sound dense, cold and harsh at the same time

I appreciate an IEM that sacrifices clarity for a thicker, more pleasant and inviting sound

I can also appreciate an IEM that sacrifices warmth and texture for clarity, detail and resolution

The Project K manages to sacrifice both clarity and warmth at the same time, without the advantages of either.

I’d like to hear it again, because I generally appreciate Belonozhko tuning, but it was so far away from something enjoyable for me, I don’t see what will reel it in.

All listening done on silver module.

6. Omnium Ti

Reserving impression on it until I hear final tuning. Heard two prototypes (kinda) today, and they show a lot of promise, but I generally don’t want to provide too much impressions without having a final unit in my hands.

Shared my feedback with Ahmed, very excited to see the final results

7. Fugaku


Please don’t light my a$$ on fire, but I hated it. You can always dismiss my impressions and if you need an excuse, I flat out can’t deal with this type of shrill, thin, cold and forward midrange regardless of note size.

If you do want to hear what I think, here it goes

First and foremost, I am not saying this in relation to price or portability (and I think that both are massive issues). I wouldn’t own the Fugaku at any price point

The bass is undoubtedly excellent in a vacuum. It’s big, it’s bold, and it has actual mid bass which I always appreciate

It is plagued by the same issues as the Moses though, it just can’t keep up with busy music.

The midrange on the Fugaku contributes to that, because there’s basically no lower mids coupled with an upper midrange that I’d describe as brutal on the ears (I exaggerate a little, but 17,000 euros makes me a little more demanding than usual). It all adds up to this artificial sense of clarity that makes vocals massive and kills any instrumental separation that the slow bass didn’t kill already

The treble is great, but with the rest of the FR who cares

Don’t kill me for these impressions, as I said earlier everything about the Fugaku’s tuning is something that I am “built” to dislike, and so is most of my library.

My more “objective” dislike for the Fugaku is the existence of the Elise Elysian X for example, which I think has a way more tasteful and mature approach to a similar mid-forward tuning with big bold bass.

8. Others

MMR Thummim - met with @doctorjuggles for dinner and drinks last night, loved the Thum as much as I did when I first heard it. A lot of the Thummim’s DNA is in the HEX, and I dare say it does some things a little better, even though the overall tuning of the HEX is much more refined with better texture, dynamics and a lot more

Erl - still as bored as I was the first time listening to it. It just presents everything as too mild and pleasant, to me it completely fails to transmit any emotion that isn’t rainbows and butterflies and unicorns

Craft Ears Aurum - it slapped back then, it still slaps. Awesome value, and something I’d enjoy listening to frequently regardless of price. Would love to compare it to Omnium Ti when that’s out

PS I forgot to keep taking photos of the stuff I listened to after the first idk how many IEMs
 
Last edited:
May 26, 2025 at 12:54 PM Post #107,178 of 107,291
Wow thank you for the honest impressions! It’s great to pierce through the hype.

What type of music do you usually listen to and what type of sound signature do you gravitate to? I’m just getting into this stuff. I am mainly focused on EDM and a really fun bassy signature while maintaining air, clarity, and a big soundstage. Anything you can recommend? Budget isn’t a concern.

So far I’ve bought Valhalla, Enigma, Giant, Twilight, Monarch MKIII, Volume S, and Oriolus Szalayi. I returned the Enigma as I had an issue with the cable, and it also was a little too midrange focused. I’ve noticed that it’s not necessarily how much $ you spend and there are diminishing returns. Have kept the others, they are all fantastic and have their own strengths, but I’m looking to add to the collection.
 
Last edited:
May 26, 2025 at 1:08 PM Post #107,179 of 107,291
Wow thank you for the honest impressions! It’s great to pierce through the hype.

What type of music do you usually listen to and what type of sound signature do you gravitate to? I’m just getting into this stuff. I am mainly focused on EDM and a really fun bassy signature while maintaining air, clarity, and a big soundstage. Anything you can recommend? Budget isn’t a concern.

So far I’ve bought Valhalla, Enigma, Giant, Twilight, Monarch MKIII, Volume S, and Oriolus Szalayi. I returned the Enigma as I had an issue with the cable, and it also was a little too midrange focused. I’ve noticed that it’s not necessarily how much $ you spend and there are diminishing returns. Have kept the others, they are all fantastic and have their own strengths, but I’m looking to add to the collection.
EDM is a little far from the stuff I listen to normally. Closest I get to it is like trance and psychedelic rock like Nicolas Jaar and DARKSIDE

Personally loved the HEX for those, but the APX SE is also absolutely outrageous, and so is the Storm if you’re after a more uncolored, mild presentation

Ahmed agreed to send me an Elise X to try (even though I was literally just there, stupid of me but was processing everything I heard), and I can provide more information on that

Please don’t take these impressions as carved in stone. Until literally yesterday I was saying Lee can’t tune mids, now I have a HEX on the way, probably his new quadbrid that’s supposed to supersede Dio, and maybe an Elise X

Just as an example, I am confident I’ll probably strongly dislike the Enigma based on the graph alone and the upper mids bump

Tastes evolve, manufacturers evolve, genre preferences change, everything in this hobby is one big variable

There’s a lot of people on headfi that listen to almost exclusively EDM that should be able to help you more
 
May 26, 2025 at 1:43 PM Post #107,180 of 107,291
Had the chance to put together the impressions from today on the train ride from London to Paris

I basically crammed two years worth of releases in two hours, so please take these impressions with a grain of salt. I would consider this more of a selection process for IEMs I’d like to revisit rather than final judgements

For the sake of simplicity, I used Eletech eartips (in two sizes) for all IEMs because they fit me extremely well, and it will provide some consistency for the impressions. I got a good seal and fit for all IEMs in these impressions

The SP3000M is the default source for all impressions in this list. I would describe it as mildly warm and very textured and smooth, if you’d like to correct for it.

Once again, a big big thank you to Elise for having me. Even more so considering today was a bank holiday in London

1. General impressions

IEMs have gotten really, really good. The sound quality on IEMs at all kinds of price points has gotten so high that I feel like differentiation is one of the main challenges for manufacturers.

A lot of IEMs sounded spectacular, and would be stone cold killers a few years ago, but competition is so high right now, it takes something extraordinary to really grab my attention.

That creates the opposite issue, where some IEMs work so hard to be distinctive, that they end up overdoing it in the wrong direction and end up sounding weird or wonky, and not in a good way

Unrelated, but I gravitated really well to the APX SE. The honeymoon has worn off, and I'd still take it over basically anything I heard today except maybe HEX.

2. Lee (Elysian and Mysticraft)

The HEX was the big star of the show for me. It is bold, with massive bass, incredible texture all around, exceptional treble tuning that manages to always sound clear and exciting, but never sibilant or unpleasant. I’ve never heard an IEM that sounded so distinctive, but manages to sound so good with literally anything I play on it

I guess I’d describe the sound as an L shape. It wasn’t forward enough in the midrange and treble to call it a W or a V shape, but the bass is also super clean so it never really interferes with the clarity and detail

In terms of chain modifications, I’d like to try some thinner and brighter cables (Euclid comes to mind), and maybe a more neutral source just to see what comes out of it

I loved how well it scales down. It sounds incredible off Apple dongle just as it does off my SP3000M, and a DACamp that Ahmed let me try. I really appreciate that it is easy to drive, and even more how unpretentious it is when it comes down to synergy

I knew I loved it in the first 2 minutes, told myself I wouldn’t listen to it any more to give time to other IEMs, but ended up trying it again and again.

Only gripe is the soundstage is a little narrower than I’d like. It’s not narrow, it’s just not flagship width like the Moses or APX SE.

I also tried the Annihilator 2023, which I liked a lot more than the 2021. It’s a bit like a less refined HEX, that edged on sibilance at times even though it had less treble overall. Amazing bass, great treble, slightly “Lee” mids with that upper midrange tilt. Not too bad though

Tried the Elise Elysian X, which is supposed to have more bass compared to the X I tried years ago. It has actual punch and mid bass presence. A hint too energetic in the upper midrange, but it’s a really respectable IEM, that had amazing clarity, detail and technicals. Would consider owning it to be honest, it’s one of the IEMs that positively surprised me the most, and is kind of sort of living in my head rent free right now

I will wait for Lee’s quadbrid and I might ask Elise to maybe let me spend like a week or whatever with the X to decide if I want to jump on one

The Mysticraft tribrid was just awful. HEX bass but didn’t achieve the same texture or separation, with a super scooped and upper-tilted upper midrange. Thin and shouty. I scrolled through a few songs really quickly, but it was just an instant pass for me

3. Storm with Sovereign 2w

This is one I was really excited to listen to, but was left very slightly underwhelmed.

Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s a great IEM, but it just didn’t do anything that was so crazy that would have me justify the cost over my custom A12t

I liked that the Storm was basically a “blank slate,” waiting for you to decide what you want it to sound like with your source.

I liked it with the Nipo N2, hated it off that huge modded iBasso (I found it extremely bright and clinical). I think people also exaggerate how hard it is to drive, because it sounded excellent off the SP3000M, and it wasn’t so far behind the Nipo N2 (which is supposed to be really powerful so I guess it can drive the Storm to most of its potential)

I understand the appeal of the IEM, especially for headphone audiophiles who already have crazy setups that are just waiting for a Storm, but it didn’t do anything so special for me to justify the cost, especially compared to other reference monitors (I consider the ability to be easily driven and scaling down advantages)

Purely subjective, but I would personally prefer IEMs that are a little more distinctive at that price range. I’m happy with the A12t sounding a little generic at 2000$, but not so much with something at the Storm’s price

I like the APX SE much better, it’s easier to drive and I feel like it has a more unique take on “reference”

Again though, I kinda get it and I respect the IEM. Can’t say anything truly negative about it. Will revisit

4. Macbeth

Not just the best BA bass I’ve heard, but some of the best bass quality I’ve heard out of any IEM.

I don’t want to say too much about the Macbeth, mostly because I want to try and create a specific chain around it to see how much I can fine tune the sound. It sounded weirdly thin, sibilant and metallic with some tracks, but like a completely different IEM with others

I don’t think I’ve experienced finding an IEM both too warm and pleasant, and too bright and harsh almost at the same time. I guess it has some really specific treble peaks that specific tracks hit

Definitely one to revisit and experiment with.

5. FiR Rn6 and Project K

Loved the Rn6, not so much the Project K. The Rn6 completely deserves all the praise it has gotten so far. It’s the most balanced FiR by a mile, with a clear but unobtrusive and textured midrange, exceptional kinetic bass and really well extended, gentle treble

Didn’t focus on technical ability too much cause I was running low on time and I already knew I wanted to give it another go. It’s excellent.

Project K… It’s a mess. It has the Xe6 bass, with fat and thick lower mids, but then it has this weird peak in the midrange that makes it sound dense, cold and harsh at the same time

I appreciate an IEM that sacrifices clarity for a thicker, more pleasant and inviting sound

I can also appreciate an IEM that sacrifices warmth and texture for clarity, detail and resolution

The Project K manages to sacrifice both clarity and warmth at the same time, without the advantages of either.

I’d like to hear it again, because I generally appreciate Belonozhko tuning, but it was so far away from something enjoyable for me, I don’t see what will reel it in.

All listening done on silver module.

6. Omnium Ti

Reserving impression on it until I hear final tuning. Heard two prototypes (kinda) today, and they show a lot of promise, but I generally don’t want to provide too much impressions without having a final unit in my hands.

Shared my feedback with Ahmed, very excited to see the final results

7. Fugaku

Please don’t light my a$$ on fire, but I hated it. You can always dismiss my impressions and if you need an excuse, I flat out can’t deal with this type of shrill, thin, cold and forward midrange regardless of note size.

If you do want to hear what I think, here it goes

First and foremost, I am not saying this in relation to price or portability (and I think that both are massive issues). I wouldn’t own the Fugaku at any price point

The bass is undoubtedly excellent in a vacuum. It’s big, it’s bold, and it has actual mid bass which I always appreciate

It is plagued by the same issues as the Moses though, it just can’t keep up with busy music.

The midrange on the Fugaku contributes to that, because there’s basically no lower mids coupled with an upper midrange that I’d describe as brutal on the ears (I exaggerate a little, but 17,000 euros makes me a little more demanding than usual). It all adds up to this artificial sense of clarity that makes vocals massive and kills any instrumental separation that the slow bass didn’t kill already

The treble is great, but with the rest of the FR who cares

Don’t kill me for these impressions, as I said earlier everything about the Fugaku’s tuning is something that I am “built” to dislike, and so is most of my library.

My more “objective” dislike for the Fugaku is the existence of the Elise Elysian X for example, which I think has a way more tasteful and mature approach to a similar mid-forward tuning with big bold bass.

8. Others

MMR Thummim - met with @doctorjuggles for dinner and drinks last night, loved the Thum as much as I did when I first heard it. A lot of the Thummim’s DNA is in the HEX, and I dare say it does some things a little better, even though the overall tuning of the HEX is much more refined with better texture, dynamics and a lot more

Erl - still as bored as I was the first time listening to it. It just presents everything as too mild and pleasant, to me it completely fails to transmit any emotion that isn’t rainbows and butterflies and unicorns

Craft Ears Aurum - it slapped back then, it still slaps. Awesome value, and something I’d enjoy listening to frequently regardless of price. Would love to compare it to Omnium Ti when that’s out

PS I forgot to keep taking photos of the stuff I listened to after the first idk how many IEMs
Great review! But how would you rate the technical capabilities of the APX SE compared to the HEX and Storm? Things like detail, soundstage, speed, and all those audiophile terms :)
 
May 26, 2025 at 1:51 PM Post #107,182 of 107,291
Has there been any word on what Oriolus is cooking up? Would be really interested to see a next version of most of their lineup, or just whatever new stuff they have but they have been quiet!
 
May 26, 2025 at 1:52 PM Post #107,183 of 107,291
Great review! But how would you rate the technical capabilities of the APX SE compared to the HEX and Storm? Things like detail, soundstage, speed, and all those audiophile terms :)
I’ll have HEX in a few weeks tops and do a proper comparison then

All three are extremely technical. At this level you’re kind of splitting hairs, and considering how many things I listened to today, I am not 100% confident in my comparison, but something like:

Speed and stage size go to APX SE

Dynamics are a very tight match between the three IMO. Maybe Storm has a mild edge here?

Speed definitely goes to APX SE, followed by HEX. It has a lot of bass and a lot of midbass, but it’s really fast and detailed

Storm plays with a touch more decay in the bass to give the feeling of texture Imo. BA bass that’s too fast sounds really plasticky. The traillii had the same “gimmick” where it gave the bass a little more decay to give the sense of a dynamic driver and more texture

Storm is very fast still though, and in my demo didn’t struggle with any track

APX SE is the most technical of the three Imo, but doesn’t sound as natural as Storm or as fun as HEX (depending on source for Storm especially)

I guess you can make the Storm extremely clinical and technical, but I didn’t like that direction for it personally
 
May 26, 2025 at 1:54 PM Post #107,184 of 107,291
Talking about Storm, anyone here can share their impression on it vs CP622B? I find it interesting for both to have a very similar graph (and similar configuration too with 2 BA bass, 5 BA mid (storm), 4 BA mid (CP622), and 2 EST for both, with CP adding extra Bone Conduction for mid. I haven't heard of Storm, but I want to find alternatives that are easier to drive (and easier to get/cheaper ofc).

Screenshot 2025-05-27 at 00.48.48.png
 
May 26, 2025 at 1:58 PM Post #107,185 of 107,291
Talking about Storm, anyone here can share their impression on it vs CP622B? I find it interesting for both to have a very similar graph (and similar configuration too with 2 BA bass, 5 BA mid (storm), 4 BA mid (CP622), and 2 EST for both, with CP adding extra Bone Conduction for mid. I haven't heard of Storm, but I want to find alternatives that are easier to drive (and easier to get/cheaper ofc).

Screenshot 2025-05-27 at 00.48.48.png
I don't own either but I have heard both. And this is a great example of why you cannot rely on graphs to guide your thought process on sound. These two sound quite different, and while there are similarities, it really ends once you plug them in and start listening.
 
May 26, 2025 at 1:58 PM Post #107,186 of 107,291
I’ll have HEX in a few weeks tops and do a proper comparison then

All three are extremely technical. At this level you’re kind of splitting hairs, and considering how many things I listened to today, I am not 100% confident in my comparison, but something like:

Speed and stage size go to APX SE

Dynamics are a very tight match between the three IMO. Maybe Storm has a mild edge here?

Speed definitely goes to APX SE, followed by HEX. It has a lot of bass and a lot of midbass, but it’s really fast and detailed

Storm plays with a touch more decay in the bass to give the feeling of texture Imo. BA bass that’s too fast sounds really plasticky. The traillii had the same “gimmick” where it gave the bass a little more decay to give the sense of a dynamic driver and more texture

Storm is very fast still though, and in my demo didn’t struggle with any track

APX SE is the most technical of the three Imo, but doesn’t sound as natural as Storm or as fun as HEX (depending on source for Storm especially)

I guess you can make the Storm extremely clinical and technical, but I didn’t like that direction for it personally
Sorry if this comes across too bluntly, but I honestly have no idea how you set up the Storm (maybe a weak source?), I can’t relate to or understand your impressions at all when compared to the APX SE.

– APX SE has a taller soundstage, while Storm feels clearly wider and more rectangular in shape.
– APX SE sounds denser and more musical; Storm is drier, but overall faster, has more speed.
– Storm is more dynamic and offers greater resolution (of course, not in the bass).
– APX SE has a longer decay in the bass (DD vs BA).
– APX SE has a higher engagement factor, more forwardness.

Anyway, I love both, definitely complementary.
 
Last edited:
May 26, 2025 at 2:07 PM Post #107,187 of 107,291
I don't own either but I have heard both. And this is a great example of why you cannot rely on graphs to guide your thought process on sound. These two sound quite different, and while there are similarities, it really ends once you plug them in and start listening.
I'm not entirely sure as from memory and after that looking up my notes I do see a pattern that would underline his thought process. I'm simply copy-pasting my notes on both below; separated by 6 months. Obviously these are just my personal observations and therefore they can't be any better or worse than anyone else's.

CANPUR CP622bI was prepared to have my mind blown by these.
Fantastic balance, not convinced on note weight and impact down low which was more of a permanent bass shelf instead, mids sounded a bit closed in, muffled and diffuse (due to the BCD?), missing a bit of sparkle while “s” sounds and cymbals had a slightly artificial sound, lacking a bit of air, staging wasn’t very convincing, nor were dynamics.

Subtonic Storm / iBasso 300 Max
Celebrating my 5th demo sample since April last year - I guess I now have officially done my utmost best to love Storm 😊. Excellent balance, could be a little more open sounding and have better timbre. Certainly not dull sounding but it does never spring to life for me and pull me into the music, which is really the very first hurdle in my book. Could use slightly more upfront vocals (just one step forward on the stage is enough) and a better physical bass / lower mids sensation. Probably needs a tube to really sing for me; not easy given the power demands so I give up - be it under protest as it's just so good overall.

drftr
 
May 26, 2025 at 2:08 PM Post #107,188 of 107,291
@mvvRAZ Very surprised Project K was such a let down for you. I've been looking forward to it, hoping it was a (very slightly) more upper mid forward Kr5. Sounds like a concise "no" on that, and coming from a Kr5 fan, it means more. Rn6 was wrong all around for me. Fir doing UM was thin and uninspiring.

APX was written off a while ago as a personal contender (planar timbre / seeming midbass lacking) but your impressions run counter and make it seem attractive again.
Thanks for the impressions.
 
May 26, 2025 at 2:09 PM Post #107,189 of 107,291
I'm not entirely sure as from memory and after that looking up my notes I do see a pattern that would underline his thought process. I'm simply copy-pasting my notes on both below; separated by 6 months. Obviously these are just my personal observations and therefore they can't be any better or worse than anyone else's.

CANPUR CP622bI was prepared to have my mind blown by these.
Fantastic balance, not convinced on note weight and impact down low which was more of a permanent bass shelf instead, mids sounded a bit closed in, muffled and diffuse (due to the BCD?), missing a bit of sparkle while “s” sounds and cymbals had a slightly artificial sound, lacking a bit of air, staging wasn’t very convincing, nor were dynamics.

Subtonic Storm / iBasso 300 Max
Celebrating my 5th demo sample since April last year - I guess I now have officially done my utmost best to love Storm 😊. Excellent balance, could be a little more open sounding and have better timbre. Certainly not dull sounding but it does never spring to life for me and pull me into the music, which is really the very first hurdle in my book. Could use slightly more upfront vocals (just one step forward on the stage is enough) and a better physical bass / lower mids sensation. Probably needs a tube to really sing for me; not easy given the power demands so I give up - be it under protest as it's just so good overall.

drftr
Your impressions of CP correspond 1:1 to mine 👍🏻
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top