what potential damages ? why do you think the Kingsound is not appropriate for the SR009 ? I understood that there are compatible....
All the modern Stax amps have three "protection" features in their circuit to prevent damage to the diaphragm if the worst happens. First, the outputs have 5.1 kilohm resistors in series with the output devices, second, the bias supply uses 0.1 uf caps to limit the amount of energy in the supply, and third, the bias has a 5 megohm resistor after the last capacitor to limit the amount of current that can flow into the diaphragm. The Woo WEE has been "dinged" for not having the last feature (and possibly for having large capacity caps as well, which are not needed for the bias supply). I don't know specifically about the Kingsound M3, however back in 2013 Kevin Gilmore looked at an M10 and here is what he said (Kingsound Head-Fi thread, post #435):
"wow, just wow and I don't mean that in a good way.
http://gilmore.chem.northwestern.edu/m10.jpg
might as well be a tube amp. 47k plate resistors and .01uf wima output caps.
STD1nk60 mosfet outputs. similar to sennheiser hev70.
no wonder there is no bass. 588 volt bias which does not match the specs.
lots of places in the middle to change resistors to get any bias voltage you want.
R108,R141,R142 in series directly off of B+, C122 directly to ground at output jack.
DO NOT EVER PLUG A SR007 or SR009 into this thing."
Also, here is spritzer (Kingsound thread, post 451)
"That cap after the ballast string is a very bad idea with modern Stax models."
Incidentally, according to spritzer the 2013 M10 circuit appears to be a clone of the Stax SRM1 MkI (circa 1979), the M20 appears to be based on a Stax DIY tube circuit from 1968, so who knows what ancient circuit the M3 is based on?