To TheAttorney (re: post 12981 of Sept.27th, Life After Stax) I would play with different cables for the HEKv2 to get around the EQ (and maybe even the crossfade).
Silver widow was superb on my Senn HD650, tightening the bass and making the upper-mid-to-high range more silky and less peaky. And Frank's customer service at Toxic is great. I used Toxic on my former Sennheiser phones and loved them.
On my HEKv2 with the Hugo TT (with and with and without external amping) I really like the Norne Draug 2. It let me drop the EQing I did to avoid a bit of glare in the HEK and again add transparency and tightness to the bass. It also adds more liquidity to vocals and strings.
The thing to focus on with the HEKv2 is liquidity in the mids. I like dynamics for liquidity (but the Audeze LCD4 has fine liquidity).
[Note: I'm sure others will chime in with suggestions that will undercut your goal of simplicity, and I will suggest you try the LCD4. Sorry to add to your anxiety. (FWIW I also have an 009 with a KGSS/mini.)]
Others here love (to the extreme) the Danacable Lazuli, but I have not heard it, so I have no idea personally.
But it appears to be much easier and faster to get than the Norne Draug and I would test it out if I were you just based on the enthusiasm for it.
(Norne also makes a higher end silver cable that is new and, well, awesome. Maybe try talking to Trevor. He is familiar with the HEK.)
Since you are from the Stax world, the headphone cable world may be a new experience for you. But I have developed the opinion that EQ is a patch that is best avoided vs. cable upgrades. The problems solved with EQ in my experience are far better attacked with good headphone cables.
When I get a good cable and I can turn off my EQ, I just go, Ahhhh..., this is much more natural and honest.
(I know this is controversial, but less so than politics, I hope.)
tl;dr summary: I love headphone cables and think they help tremendously and think it is a much better approach then EQ. Try Norne Draug2.