1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

    Dismiss Notice

The Stax Thread III

Discussion in 'High-end Audio Forum' started by currawong, Aug 20, 2013.
Tags:
First
 
Back
769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778
780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789
Next
 
Last
  1. Rossliew
    All this talk of the Lambda NB makes me anxious for my Carbon that's being built with a normal bias socket as well :grin: Hope it does the NB justice as much as the BHSE does.
     
  2. Ampeezy

    ​Did anyone call the sr-007 (modded) dark? With the carbon at 20ma it is very neutral with excellent extension both ends, with a good weight to the sound. I don't feel that the amp is bright itself though, but rather that the sr-007 is being driven with a good kick in the behind.
     
    I can see though how a brighter headphone, like the sr-009 has been purported to be, might not fair so well at this current
     
  3. deuter

    Understand, never heard one so probably should've kept quiet.
     
  4. Ampeezy

    I assume you have the 009 as well. Quck comparison with the L700?
     
  5. Ali-Pacha
    Throwing $6K in a BHSE for only one pair of Lambdas looks like a whole new level of stupidity...but we are on head-fi, so your reaction is not that illegitimate. Sorry for the easy sarcasm [​IMG]
     
    BTW, Lambdas are all around not up to Omega level (technicality), but they have their particular sound, and among those Lambdas, normal bias / signature are my favourite. I find SR-X0X too shouty and somehow gritty in the upper mids, and Nova signature a bit boring, even out of a BHSE.
    L700 is kinda different beast, with some of 009 technicalities...see some of my posts from here : http://www.head-fi.org/t/785949/the-stax-sr-l500-and-sr-l700-impressions-thread/510#post_13340045
    You may also look at another posts about some of my Staxen's on another site [​IMG]
     
    Ali
     
    arnaud likes this.
  6. JimL11

    Let me point out that KG's post has mostly to do with engineering decisions.
     
    1)  the slew rate needed for a signal is directly level and frequency dependent - i.e. if you double the signal level you double the slew rate.  Also, if you double the frequency reproduced, you double the slew rate.
     
    2)  the maximum level which can be produced by most electrostatic headphone amps is very high.  With a typical Stax headphone producing 100 dB levels at 100 VRMS, most headphone amps can produce at least 110 db average levels - a live rock concert produces 110-120 dB levels.  Per OSHA standards, the maximum work exposure levels are 8 hr/day at 90 dB, 2 hr/day at 100 dB and 30 min/day at 110 db.  Furthermore, exposure to 100 dB for 15 min can cause permanent hearing damage in some people.   In other words, playing music at peak levels sufficient to clip your amplifier for a significant period of time WILL cause permanent hearing loss.  We know that many long time rockers have hearing damage, but even classical musicians, where average levels are significantly lower, can have permeant hearing loss.  Here is a website that lists comparative sound levels:
    http://www.industrialnoisecontrol.com/comparative-noise-examples.htm
     
    3)  to reproduce 99+% of music signals, the maximum slew rate required is that required to reproduce a 6 kHz sine wave at full volume - this was shown a number of years ago by both Nelson Pass and Peter Baxandall.  Note that the required slew rate for 6 kHz is 1/3 the rate required to reproduce a 20 kHz sine wave at full volume.
     
    When you combine all these considerations together, the requirement for reproducing 20 kHz sine waves at full volume is well in excess of what is required for music reproduction at safe hearing levels.  Of course, there is nothing wrong with overkill - if you can afford it.
     
    arnaud likes this.
  7. Whitigir

    What does this have to do with the way how ES work in related to Current setting and tonality ? I don't know all that, but I can tell you that from my Carbon and 009 , 16.5mA have more organic sound than 17.5mA and above
     
  8. JimL11
    My point was that it probably doesn't have a lot to do with what the "proper" current setting is for your amplifier.  From a strictly engineering perspective, 16.5 mA or 20 mA are both are more than adequate.  Now, perhaps there might be a measurable difference in distortion at near clipping levels, but its relevance to the sound at lower levels would be conjectural.  20 mA is MORE overkill than 16.5 mA, but in terms of sound, who knows [shrugs shoulders]. The overall point is that it is difficult to tie in the sound to a particular measured parameter, which is something that needs restating from time to time.
     
    arnaud likes this.
  9. astrostar59

    Good information JimL11
     
    I haven't heard my Carbon at different mA levels, it is at 18 now I believe. But I read some posts at the other place of folk who tried lowering the mA and they stated it 'calmed' the treble a bit, but crucially reduced the soundstage a bit. I have no brightness issues on my Carbon and 009, so won't try it. I would say, it is better to 'tune' the rest of the gear if is is a bit bright, or change the DAC for example. It is worth the hassle IMO.
     
  10. Whitigir

    Yes, great info indeed. I have now returned to my 16.5mA and I am happy again.

    For my experiences, the lower-end spectrum and the tonality body are different from 16-17mA. Neither treble nor soundstage sacrifice the whole lot to my observations. Also, it is very true that the treble extensions and the edges are smoother in the lower range than higher range. This result stands true from either my Walkman as a source or my DAC.

    This has got to be heavily personal preferences.
     
  11. ductrung3993
    Any Stax guy in SF? I got a 007 mk1 coming but got no electrostat amp to try it on. Would be great i can have a session with your amp. Thanks!
     
  12. Sianlaser
    I am looking to get a set of the new Stax L300 and I was wondering if I should just get the package SRS 3100 or get the L300 and an aftermarket amp.  So is there an amp that is under $500 that would be a noticeable improvement over the amp that comes in the SRS 3100 set?
     
    Thanks!
     
  13. JimL11

    The only way you could get a better amp under $500 are 1) build it yourself or 2) buy used.  However, most of the used Stax amps that sell for under $500 are older models like the SRM1 Mk II Pro (solid state) or SRM-T1 (hybrid with tube output) that will need, at a minimum, replacement of all the electrolytic caps, since 20 or 30 year old electrolytic caps tend to go bad.  With the SRM1, you also need to make sure it has a pro output socket as some of them pre-date the onset of pro bias Stax headphones. Sometimes you can get a used SRM323 for $500 or less. This is a newer model and would be a better bet if you don't want to deal with replacing electrolytic caps.   
     
    OTOH, the advantage of DIY is that building something like a KGSS Carbon, or even an SRX Plus, will allow you to upgrade your headphones in the future without having to change amps.  I built my SRX Plus for about $500, a KGSS Carbon will cost significantly more.
     
  14. Razornova
    Anyone tried adding a tube preamp before a stax solid state amp for some tube flavor? Would love it know if anyone has managed to get good results doing so.
     
  15. dubharmonic

    I tried using the output from a Vali 2 a while back. It was interesting but not fun enough to stick with. IMG_2671.jpg
     
First
 
Back
769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778
780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789
Next
 
Last

Share This Page