The "RSA" Shadow, a powerful pixy of an amp . . . New images. .
Aug 23, 2009 at 4:28 PM Post #106 of 184
It has a set gain with plenty of volume.
 
Aug 23, 2009 at 8:02 PM Post #107 of 184
Thanks for the pics. It really is a beauty. I (think I) will keep my P-51 if they sound similar.
 
Aug 24, 2009 at 12:56 AM Post #109 of 184
Will it be able to drive full size headphones - of both high and low impedance ?

Or, I should wait for Ibasso OEM which is under conceptualization?

Any idea how much a 'Shadow' might cost ? $300 would be sweet.
 
Aug 24, 2009 at 2:54 AM Post #110 of 184
Any amp can be used with just one gain, provided it's high enough to drive 300-600 ohms.
You just lose the ability to "fine tune".

I use my Mustang on the Medium setting for almost everything (can't be bothered with "low") and use high for the 800's.
With the SR-71 you gotta do, what you gotta do, to survive.
 
Aug 24, 2009 at 4:36 AM Post #111 of 184
The Shadow does a very respectful job of driving a number of headphones. It is musical and enjoyable. It is almost like you don't have an amp because the bulk is so small but you do get some good music. You can see in my signature what headphones and IEM's I have.
 
Aug 24, 2009 at 5:24 AM Post #112 of 184
Now for a full-fledged review of the final product, and perhaps comparisons to the Predator and the Mustang... and... of course.. a price point
 
Aug 24, 2009 at 11:08 PM Post #113 of 184
I see that today Ray has posted that you can reserve the amp now. The selling price will be $395.00 with an introductory price of 350 for the first 200 units. I also see where he states that it isn't meant to drive inefficient and high impedance cans to loud levels. I can say that it does drive high quality IEM's like the JH13's with total ease.

The gain of this amp is set at 3 and there are no capacitors directly in the signal path.
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 1:12 AM Post #114 of 184
I'm sorry. Where did Ray post about reserving the unit? It's not on his website.
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 1:33 AM Post #115 of 184
Aug 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM Post #116 of 184
I think I will pass on this amp. I am more than satisfied with the P-51. So unless it is a whole nother world I can live with the size of the P-51.
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 1:31 PM Post #117 of 184
Quote:

Originally Posted by rasmushorn /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I think I will pass on this amp. I am more than satisfied with the P-51. So unless it is a whole nother world I can live with the size of the P-51.


I haven't heard it yet, and I also have a Mustang. From what I have heard, it is both more and less of the same. :wink:

For me, smaller size (every little bit counts), precise volume control and balance, and USB charging are big pluses. So, my order is in.
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 3:31 PM Post #118 of 184
Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott_Tarlow /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I am actually disappointed in the looks... I think I just like my Pico better.


x2. I really didn't like the jack placement. PICO seems more appealing to me now ..
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 6:54 PM Post #120 of 184
Quote:

Originally Posted by animalsrush /img/forum/go_quote.gif
x2. I really didn't like the jack placement. PICO seems more appealing to me now ..


A rear mounted jack on an amp like this is vital if you want to use it with a low profile 90 degree LOD and iPod type player. Don't be surprised if other amp builders start placing jacks on the rear on their smallest amps.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top