Christer
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2015
- Posts
- 1,994
- Likes
- 2,046
Well the price difference will not be nearly in the same category as adding ferrited BNCs to HMS was. My guess is we're talking a HUGE increase in price going from HMS to Quartet. But will there also be an easily audible, increase in SQ of a similar magnitude as the expected horrific extra cost with unamplified acoustic instruments music?People happy to spend thousands on diy ferrite cables made in a shed but not on the extra it would cost between Hugo scaler and quartet
And do not forget that Rob admitted that those ferrited "made in a shed" BNCs improved SQ compared to the supplied ones with HMS and Dac used plugged in. But not running via batteries?
Interesting that he has made his own "identical to battery" PSU for Quartet. But will it work with Dave or any other Chord dacs as well or not?
And if not? WHY NOT?
Also interesting to hear him talk about competing pc pre upsamplers and algorithms .
But what if they too have improved their algorithms comparably recently?
The only such version I have compared with Robs mscaling was PGGB at some 30 M taps a few years ago.Interesting but too much hassle involved . Maybe Triode User could chime in on how things stand as far that competitor is concerned purely SQ wise when he has auditioned Quartet?
Personally I am of course very curious to hear how much Quartet actually improves SQ over HMS. But I am very unikely to get one unless Rob gives me one for free being "the unashamed fanboy I am,I am ....".
Stealing one would of course be an option. But this Atheist follows at least one of the Ten Commandments thoroughly. "Thow shalt not steal".
One thing will be quite certain though, price-wise Quartet will most probably NOT be talked about as "A steal for money" even among the most dedicated fanboys here.
Cheers CC
Last edited: