The one who waits for something good, can not wait to long
Cant tell at the moment, have to insure it first, it is in another leage price wise than Chord yo know..
PS
How is it going with the "saving up for the Hugo 2" Christer?
I expecting a order from you after lurking around in the DAVE and Hugo threads for years know, and getting more and seems more and more tierd of your Hugo 1 and Benchmark ?
Hi Fredrik, to be quite honest, prices in Sweden are too high so if I buy a HUGO 2 or DAVE I'll buy it in Asia.
It is not that I need to save up to buy either HUGO 2 or even a DAVE. But I still suspect that there might be cheaper ways to achieve basically the same SQ a lot cheaper than what Chord is asking for their products.
HUGO is good in many ways for its size but very problematic in other ways. And not quite what I had been expecting from all the hype around it when launched.
And it is interesting to get all this input from others before actually auditioning HUGO 2.
And I also enjoy lurking a bit.
Moreover all the QC problems reported here regarding HUGO 2 has made me a bit wary.
It seems they have at least solved one major problem with HUGO 1 on HUGO 2.
A dead batttery does not equal a dead DAC as on my HUGO
And although not quite in DAVE or dCs territory,my Benchmark DAC 2 especially via my HEKV 2 sounds very nice indeed with well recorded acoustic music.
And contrary to what many chord fanboys believe there are other good DACs too. dCs is used by some classical music recording companies for example.
As are Merging and RME ADC/DACs
And Benchmark are behind some excellent sounding recordings from no less a stellar orchestra and hall than the Concertgebouw in Amsterdam so I am not in a hurry to waste money for small improvements.
"I'm good" as the Amercans say.
Let us know how your still "secret" dCS sounds .
The latest dCS I heard was a Vivaldi unit.
I haven't auditioned the Rossini yet.
Cheers Christer