Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMan007 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
And you know this how? Did you take a survey of every single or 'most' purchasers? Are they truly 'perfectly' happy, or just settling as someone else said? Or just sucking up which I get from the tone of lots of posts.
|
So you agree with Prole's post saying that the petty bickering back and forth is silly (it is), immediately after instigating some petty bickering of your own?
Oh well. I have no idea if anyone is "perfectly" happy. I never am. I think it's pretty clear that what I meant is that they're happy enough to continue with their purchase, and Todd stated that this was the case with the vast majority of outstanding orders. I don't know why you feel the need to parse the colloquial expression "perfectly fine" when it's obvious what I actually intended by that phrase.
Quote:
Some people can't live with the '1' cosmetic defect but it's ok for you to tell them what to think, when other possible cosmetic defects that you deem unacceptable would warrant a repair? What makes you or anyone else the final arbiter, especially when it comes to other's opinions? |
Why are you picking a fight? I never told anyone what to think. I could not care any less what anyone thinks. I hope that those who are not happy with the F1 error cancel their orders, and I understand perfectly that this error is a dealbreaker for some. It isn't
for me, but I never told anyone to suck it up and be happy with it. All I said is that those who are unhappy should talk with their money and refrain from purchasing from Grado. This, as opposed to forcing Grado to lose money correcting an error that was advertised as such before most people had purchased the limited-edition headphone.
This error has been noted by Todd and Grado and therefore is being delivered as advertised. They have no obligation to "fix" the typo. If the ordered headphones arrive with an additional, unadvertised defect in workmanship,
then everyone is certainly entitled to have Grado fix it.
Quote:
Also if we're meant to disregard the defect because it's a 'special gift' to the head-fi community what does profit have to do with it? Last I knew gifts weren't about profit. |
There's a difference between making a low-profitability headphone apart from an ordinary production run and losing money. I never implied this was a "gift" in that Grado does not care about turning some profit on these headphones. I merely meant to imply that Grado should not be forced to lose money on headphones offered as limited editions just because people that can't live with the error but who haven't yet given their money to Grado Labs are requesting a fairly intensive retooling, re-anodizing, and re-engraving. Simple as that.
If anyone disagrees with that, they're welcome to do so, but I'm not picking a fight with them, and this bickering has been hugely unproductive, just as Prole stated.
So, stop with the bickering now? I'm not getting caught up in this hostile silliness anymore.