- Joined
- May 9, 2011
- Posts
- 786
- Likes
- 403
The 435 sounds like what you want.
What is the difference between the 435 and the 335 technically and tonally?
The 435 sounds like what you want.
The 435 sounds like what you want.
What is the difference between the 435 and the 335 technically and tonally?
Btw, do you guys think 335DW has more clarity than Parterre while still being more forgiving than c435?
I am looking for an IEM that has the following attributes in order of importance (the fist being the most):
Detailed (+ fast)
Transparent
3D Soundstage (+ imaging)
Coherent
Analytical
Liquid
Neutral
Do any of FitEars offerings help here?
While fitears are very good, I personally don't think any of them are exactly neutral.
Agreed, Sutjahjo. I think the most neutral is the C435, with slightly sweeter mids.
So I have been doing some research on BA drivers. It seems to be a case of the more the merrier.
So I have been doing some research on BA drivers. It seems to be a case of the more the merrier. What strikes me is as to why FitEar does not use multiple drivers for each frequency band. So far to my recollection they only employ the use of dual drivers for two with the remaining frequency (high, low or mid) stuck with just a single BA. Does anyone think FitEar will create IEMs that use multiple drivers for each frequency range?
I also stumbled upon an article depicting how to go about solving this. I know it is not just about shear gimmicky numbers, but implementing more BA drivers in an IEM design helps reduce the work load that each has to deal with, making the sound more effortless resulting in improved detail retrieval. I do not own any BA IEMs but am just explaining what if have researched. What are your thoughts?
Article: http://cymbacavum.com/2014/03/26/sonions-acupass-technology-making-things-easier-for-everyone/