Quote:
Originally Posted by blue_lammer /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Hey I have a quick question to those with golden ears. I can't tell the difference between the DACs of the Compass and that of the Chaintech AV-710 (Wolfson WM8728). Does this mean I should stop upgrading my equipment or am I okay since the DACs are about the same?
|
If two components are designed to be dead neutral in their sound, then for the most part, they wont sound different, unless the care in design and construction of one is better such that you can hear more detail in the music.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue_lammer /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I think this may be the end of the line for me, which is good and bad in a way ^ ^. To be honest I've listened to Prickly Pete's $5000 balanced HD650 setup and I wasn't really blown away, it sounded rather pedestrian, as sacrilegious as that sounds.
I may have a golden tongue, but not golden ears. I'm happy where I am and I think I'll call it a day. I may switch headphones but I doubt I'll be changing from the compass anytime soon.
|
A useful point made elsewhere is that a lot of gear, including headphones, is designed to impress you on first listen (in the showroom for example). In the case of headphones, it may be a boost in the mid-bass region that makes music sound fun, or a boost in treble to fool people into thinking there is more detail. What I am going to call a purist audiophile set-up is designed to reproduce the music (the data or signal) as accurately and with as little distortion as possible. This kind of gear isn't fun at first listen, but, more so in the case of a speaker rig, can be awesome if it powerfully reproduced a live performance, ie: You could easily close your eyes and feel you are
there.
Now because most of us are dealing with coloured headphones the Compass isn't really aimed at the purist audiophile IMO, not when we swap HDAMs and whatnot to adjust the sound for our headphones and music. Also, a lot of modern music doesn't really benefit from an audiophile system (though it's nicer, for the most part to hear it in high quality, it wasn't designed to be played back in one). An example might be Alicia Keys, whom, when I hear her singing on my rig, I can clearly visualise the studio she was standing in when she sang, and am annoyed at the crappy pre-recorded synthetic rubbish they overlayed to make the track.
I hope that goes some way to explain what is going on when you all experience the things you do.