Sylmar
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2016
- Posts
- 405
- Likes
- 152
Does anyone know if there's a big difference in this year's version of the Pro and the older one?
I don't think they've changed anything but the cable. It's only the Piano that's been retuned.
How does the Pro compare to the Cello soundwise? What I love about the Pro is it's mellow warm sound. I'm expecting the Cello to be more analytical but I'd still love to maintain that Pro mellowness so I'm wondering if I should upgrade from Pro to Cello.
It has a similar signature but just more refined IMO. It also has much better sub bass to my ears and less mid bass.
If the Pro is considered balanced, I really don't want to know what a Crazy Cello sounds like.I finally got my hands on the Pro. Just can't resist trying it out though I've own the Cello. In my opinion, sound quality wise, the Cello is better in range, clarity and sub bass. The Pro have better separation, soundstage and overall felt more balanced.
I finally got my hands on the Pro. Just can't resist trying it out though I've own the Cello. In my opinion, sound quality wise, the Cello is better in range, clarity and sub bass. The Pro have better separation, soundstage and overall felt more balanced.
I do not agree with you.The Cellos are completely different in signature.The Pros are not balanced.Not at all.They're V shaped,dark sounding and relaxing.Cellos are very wide range in frequencies,and for me more balanced.Just a little of sub bass tuned.The Pros do not stand a chance.
I do not agree with you.The Cellos are completely different in signature.The Pros are not balanced.Not at all.They're V shaped,dark sounding and relaxing.Cellos are very wide range in frequencies,and for me more balanced.Just a little of sub bass tuned.The Pros do not stand a chance.