borrego
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Posts
- 1,244
- Likes
- 333
I just received the SA3000 I bought from ebay for $139 this morning. I plugged the brand new headphones to my S:flo2/Arrow amp and listened for 15mins. I would say it worths more than the $139 I paid
I was looking for full size cans for Classical/String listening. Sound stage and detail level at least matching my RE0 was the criteria. My choices was down to the K702 and the SA5000. Then I saw the SA3000 on ebay for $139. I did a bit of research and found the SA5000 and SA3000 use the same drivers (confirmed from Sony service manual), and the only difference related to sound are the earpads, and the damping membranes behind the drivers (which many SA5000 users would remove as mod anyway), I decided buying the SA3000 and save US$230
The first 15mins listening proved my choice is right. It is exactly the "Supersized" RE0 I expected. It is a bit bass light like the RE0 but does exceed the RE0 at extension at both ends, details level and sound stage. I can't be more happy for the $139 spent.
My Beyer A1 "clone" amp should arrive in next month. By then the SA3000 shall be burnt in and I shall decide if I will do any mod to the SA3000.
Update 10th August 2010
My A1 clone amp arrived this morning. My idea was: The details revealing SA3000 should be driven with a details revealing amp to sound good.
The Beyerdynamic A1 has the reputation of being natural and very details revealing. My A1 clone, withthe input selection circuitary omitted, should sound even more transparent.
Setup: S:flo2 (v2.3 firmware, external lithium battery powered) -> Oyaide HPC-35R 3.5mm to RCA cable -> A1 Clone -> SA3000
Material: 16bit FLACs
The SA3000/A1 clone is my office setup so the S:flo2 is the best sound source available for the time being.
Initial comparision with S:flo2 -> Oyaide 3.5mm to 3.5mm cable -> Arrow 12HE with bass boost setting 1:
1. Very clear sound. I must say it is another level of "clearness" above the Arrow. The A1 clone is simply without any detectable noise and is outputing "crystal clear" sound.
2. Bass. More and even better control than the Arrow with bass boost 1. I am happy with the SA3000's bass with the A1 clone. Bass quantity is about the same of my HD25/S:flo2/Arrow combo. I don't feel any need to boost the bass quantity further.
3. Mid/Vocals: Very detailed (just a little bit more than from the Arrow). I would use the word "Complete" instead of "Full" to describe
4. Treble: Similar to the Arrow (that's is good)
5. Sound stage: Similar to the Arrow
6. Instrument seperation: Not listened to classical tracks yet, but I can count more "layers" from the music.
I am very happy. I prove myself correct that the SA3000 should sound best when it is paired with an amp which can provide details it requires. To make the Sony sounds good, it is to make sure it is not starved of details from the source. If it is done, one will not find the SA3000 bright or treble bias.
PS: please PM me if you want to find out more on the A1 clone.
I was looking for full size cans for Classical/String listening. Sound stage and detail level at least matching my RE0 was the criteria. My choices was down to the K702 and the SA5000. Then I saw the SA3000 on ebay for $139. I did a bit of research and found the SA5000 and SA3000 use the same drivers (confirmed from Sony service manual), and the only difference related to sound are the earpads, and the damping membranes behind the drivers (which many SA5000 users would remove as mod anyway), I decided buying the SA3000 and save US$230
The first 15mins listening proved my choice is right. It is exactly the "Supersized" RE0 I expected. It is a bit bass light like the RE0 but does exceed the RE0 at extension at both ends, details level and sound stage. I can't be more happy for the $139 spent.
My Beyer A1 "clone" amp should arrive in next month. By then the SA3000 shall be burnt in and I shall decide if I will do any mod to the SA3000.
Update 10th August 2010
My A1 clone amp arrived this morning. My idea was: The details revealing SA3000 should be driven with a details revealing amp to sound good.
The Beyerdynamic A1 has the reputation of being natural and very details revealing. My A1 clone, withthe input selection circuitary omitted, should sound even more transparent.
Setup: S:flo2 (v2.3 firmware, external lithium battery powered) -> Oyaide HPC-35R 3.5mm to RCA cable -> A1 Clone -> SA3000
Material: 16bit FLACs
The SA3000/A1 clone is my office setup so the S:flo2 is the best sound source available for the time being.
Initial comparision with S:flo2 -> Oyaide 3.5mm to 3.5mm cable -> Arrow 12HE with bass boost setting 1:
1. Very clear sound. I must say it is another level of "clearness" above the Arrow. The A1 clone is simply without any detectable noise and is outputing "crystal clear" sound.
2. Bass. More and even better control than the Arrow with bass boost 1. I am happy with the SA3000's bass with the A1 clone. Bass quantity is about the same of my HD25/S:flo2/Arrow combo. I don't feel any need to boost the bass quantity further.
3. Mid/Vocals: Very detailed (just a little bit more than from the Arrow). I would use the word "Complete" instead of "Full" to describe
4. Treble: Similar to the Arrow (that's is good)
5. Sound stage: Similar to the Arrow
6. Instrument seperation: Not listened to classical tracks yet, but I can count more "layers" from the music.
I am very happy. I prove myself correct that the SA3000 should sound best when it is paired with an amp which can provide details it requires. To make the Sony sounds good, it is to make sure it is not starved of details from the source. If it is done, one will not find the SA3000 bright or treble bias.
PS: please PM me if you want to find out more on the A1 clone.