alcyst
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Posts
- 170
- Likes
- 22
Has anyone tried the Comply foam with the SR002? The OEM partner list is...comprehensive, I don't think I have heard of even half of those.
Has anyone tried the Comply foam with the SR002? The OEM partner list is...comprehensive, I don't think I have heard of even half of those.
Does anyone know about the new version of SR-002 current state? Thanks
Thanks for your reply, oh man Stax c'mon. Can't understand this, the SR-002 is one of the most underrated TOTL IEM in the world and a modern Stax DAC/AMP + improved SR-002 with smaller nozzle would be $$$.
Thanks for your reply, oh man Stax c'mon. Can't understand this, the SR-002 is one of the most underrated TOTL IEM in the world and a modern Stax DAC/AMP + improved SR-002 with smaller nozzle would be $$$.
You don't like the sound of the Kse1500?I once had great hope for Shure KSE1500 and though maybe it could be the electrostatic IEM that finally beat Stax at its own games. But it turns out KSE1500 is tuned way too close-in sounding that it loses all the magic of the openness in electrostatic sound and sounds just like a regular IEM. Oh well, I guess we still have to wait for Stax to do its things... in time.
You don't like the sound of the Kse1500?
I found the JH line up metal jacket nothing to write home about, especially not the Rosie. The Layla is technically impressive but too expensive. Anyways, found the Kse1500 better to my taste than Rosie, but brief listen.Not that I don't like it, I just don't find it special in any way. If given the choice, I am probably more inclined to get JH Rosie or JH13 Pro over KSE1500. By all mean KSE1500 is a really good IEM, it just isn't a really good electrostatic because it doesn't quite showcase the openness that electrostatics is known for (but in fact has a close-in sound). That might be fine for others, but it is a total turn-off for me. There is no reason to go for an electrostatics when its great strength has been taken away.