- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Posts
- 10,176
- Likes
- 1,097
well....................
im no big fan on the um3x. it is significantly better but its sound signature really doesnt sit so well with me. one of the things i loved about the PL-50 was its mid centric sound and their liquidity and smoothness. for me the se530 has supremely glorious mids so if your after something that sounds like the PL-50 then thats what id suggest going for.
so ignoring which for the moment id say yes there is a still a pretty sizeable improvement to be had from getting something better. depending on what you came from however it may not be quite as dramatic a leap as it was to the PL-50. so, that brings us to is it worth doing so? id say yes it is but dont feel you have to. the PL-50 is a stunner for its price so dont expect that paying 5 times its price is going to get you 5 times as good sounding. lol there was a reason i gushed so much over the 50 you know
im no big fan on the um3x. it is significantly better but its sound signature really doesnt sit so well with me. one of the things i loved about the PL-50 was its mid centric sound and their liquidity and smoothness. for me the se530 has supremely glorious mids so if your after something that sounds like the PL-50 then thats what id suggest going for.
so ignoring which for the moment id say yes there is a still a pretty sizeable improvement to be had from getting something better. depending on what you came from however it may not be quite as dramatic a leap as it was to the PL-50. so, that brings us to is it worth doing so? id say yes it is but dont feel you have to. the PL-50 is a stunner for its price so dont expect that paying 5 times its price is going to get you 5 times as good sounding. lol there was a reason i gushed so much over the 50 you know