SOUNDAWARE M1(PRO) Portable Player with Proprietary FPGA Architecture
Dec 24, 2015 at 4:53 AM Post #543 of 1,094
Thanks guys suggestion, have received. 
beerchug.gif

 
Soundaware Stay updated on Soundaware at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/Soundaware-Audio-CoLtd-140035019979865/ https://www.us.soundaware.net/ Soundaware Official market@soundaware.net
Dec 24, 2015 at 9:45 PM Post #547 of 1,094
  soundaware: Hello, I wonder what is the difference the Pro version from of analog and vitality?

The main difference between them is about the clock quality. M1PRO used the femto-second clock, which devote much to the better sound quality. Besides, capacitance is also different.
Anyway, the sound quality has obvious distinguish.
 
Soundaware Stay updated on Soundaware at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/Soundaware-Audio-CoLtd-140035019979865/ https://www.us.soundaware.net/ Soundaware Official market@soundaware.net
Dec 25, 2015 at 2:54 AM Post #550 of 1,094
@mrinspire: Merry Christmas to you, too! 
 
Nice review! I need to review the Esther Analog, as well. I think I will make it a New Year's present to SOUNDAWARE. There, I've set a deadline for myself, so I'd better stick to it!
 
One thing I'd take exception to is dismissing Low and Medium Gain. SOUNDAWARE advises users to use as high a volume setting as practical to make best use of their DAC programming. As an IEM user, I routinely use Low Gain to my advantage. With some of my lower sensitivity IEM, I'm even able to achieve 80-90 out of 100 volume.
 
In fact, one of the strengths of the Esther (and iBasso DAPs) is this L, M, H Gain philosophy, IMHO. It allows user of very sensitive, medium sensitive, and low sensitive gear to choose he best Gain Setting to fine tune volume. I really, really appreciate this.
 
I've actually had arguments before over 60 vs.120 volume steps for DAPs because I'm primarily an IEM user, and the other was a low-sensitivity headphone user. I strongly believe the L, M, H Gain approach is the best compromise to satisfy all user and applaud SOUNDAWARE for accommodating us. Good job @soundaware!!! 
beerchug.gif

 
Dec 25, 2015 at 3:17 AM Post #551 of 1,094
  Has anyone who has this player (analogue version) compared it to HM-901 or Lotto Paw Gold?
 
I see people describing Esther as warm, it seems like something I might like - I have the HM901 at the moment with 'classic' amp card, but it's so unreliable and I'm tired of having it repaired.

 
I borrows a HM901 with the balanced card, a combo I really liked as it was slightly warm and musical. The Analog version of the Esther is quite forgiving, without seeming to lose detail, so I reckon you might like indeed like it.
 
Dec 25, 2015 at 3:22 AM Post #552 of 1,094
Currawong: How do you find Esther with multi-BA IEM? I've been demoing the Empire Ears lineup and found it sounds much warmer with the high-driver IEM. Besides those pairings, I absolutely love Esther Analog's sound warm, glowing sound signature. I find myself reaching for it more than other DAPs.
 
Dec 26, 2015 at 10:46 PM Post #554 of 1,094
Hi All, came across this thread on my search for an upgrade to the fiio x5ii. Pls tell me that The genre tab in the UI drills down to albums and then songs! Also is the pro version available and where? Thanks!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top