mmerrill99
Member of the Trade: M2 Tech
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2006
- Posts
- 1,233
- Likes
- 46
Quote:
I'm not sure if you're agreeing with Mr. Lavry here Daniel but I have outlined my understanding of the way this whole cable issue works & it seems like I have no more to say. That's not to say I've a fixed position about it as I'm willing to change based on new information (as I have changed my understanding of this since I started posting).
I'll state again, all this started because Mr. Lavry slated a post I made stating that RF engineers favoured long cables. I asked hime questions but found the answers lacking. This forced me to delve into some research & my posts above are the extent of what I have found.
He is still berating me (maybe I deserve it after being harsh with him but I explained my reasons) but not addresssing the points raised!
Dan, if you really to advance understanding of this topic then make some posts that explain how my summary is wrong. Otherwise, I think we can all leave this be!
Originally Posted by DanielCox /img/forum/go_quote.gif What are you talking about? That IS the reality of it. |
I'm not sure if you're agreeing with Mr. Lavry here Daniel but I have outlined my understanding of the way this whole cable issue works & it seems like I have no more to say. That's not to say I've a fixed position about it as I'm willing to change based on new information (as I have changed my understanding of this since I started posting).
I'll state again, all this started because Mr. Lavry slated a post I made stating that RF engineers favoured long cables. I asked hime questions but found the answers lacking. This forced me to delve into some research & my posts above are the extent of what I have found.
He is still berating me (maybe I deserve it after being harsh with him but I explained my reasons) but not addresssing the points raised!
Dan, if you really to advance understanding of this topic then make some posts that explain how my summary is wrong. Otherwise, I think we can all leave this be!