This is from another thread about the Qualia, but I think my response is more appropriate here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by immtbiker
I'm not putting down the SA5000's...I listened to lan's at the mini-meet. It's just that they are more in the arena of the 650's and not the R-10's or the 010's . It's not a viable alternative.
The Omega's are a better comparison, in both price and quality.
|
I gotta second this opinion. This is despite the fact I far prefer the SA5k in my rig with my music, IMO it doesn't have the depth of quality of my Qualia.
I enjoy my SA5k the way I enjoy a bacon double cheeseburger from Burger King. Nothing subtle about it, one of my favorite foods in the world. But still fast food.
I also have to backtrack and agree more with those who said the SA5k doesn't sound anything like the Qualia. Don't get me wrong - I still stand by my statement that they're clearly from the same Sony family, but man, they do sound very different.
The honest truth is that after I got my Qualia and sold my first SA5k, I had some serious doubts on whether I had made the right decision. The SA5k was great, especially in my rig with my music. And the Qualia wasn't performing the same way. I held back on getting a replacement SA5k for a long time because I wanted to give the Qualia a chance. Quite frankly, I was afraid that I had made a mistake buying the Qualia. I finally decided, heck with it, if I liked the SA5k better, so be it and I shouldn't let my purchase of the Qualia keep me from having an SA5k. I decided I can sell the Qualia and cut my losses, if necessary.
So I got the SA5k, and yes, it's as wonderful as I remember it. Can I say how much I really really love bacon double cheeseburgers?
Man, it is a whole lot of fun.
But actually having it again for comparison with the Qualia makes me appreciate the Qualia a whole lot more. It doesn't sound as immediately pleasurable as the SA5k playing my pop music, but it sounds a lot more interesting and can be a lot more involving. I honestly don't know how much play time each will get in my system. Probably will just depend on what kind of listening experience I'm looking for.
Now back to listening to the SA3k. The SA3k does strike me as a baby SA5k, in that it sounds pretty similar to the SA5k (as contrasted to the SA5k/Qualia relationship.) I do need to give it time to give it a fair evaluation, but I will say this (I don't think this opinion will change, even with burn-in) - if you're looking at the SA3k hoping to get 90% of the performance of the SA5k, but at 50% of the cost, I think you should save your money and get the SA5k. There is an awful lot that I like about the SA3k, but the SA5k is a clear class ahead, and the improvements are well worth the money in my mind.
But if you're considering the SA3k on its own merits and the SA5k isn't in the picture, again, there is a lot I like about it and I'll post more later. To some degree, I think the better comparisons are SA3k and HD600 than SA3k/SA5k...
Best regards,
-Jason