Gals
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2015
- Posts
- 52
- Likes
- 13
PHA-1 recommended for its price range? Would pair better with a Sony a15 than a non Sony AMP ?
Why not use the analog output of the device for car stereo? Doesn't using the L5 cable means that the signal will be processed on your car stereo? Isn't it better to let the Sony do the job?
I've just ordered the Fiio L16 cable for my car stereo....
the simple fact of upsampling doesn't create "fitting" signal in the frequencies that weren't there before. only a DSP can do that.
my little problem with dsee is that the marketing shows how some 128k mp3 doesn't have anything past ... what is it?16khz?. and tells us that dsee adds some noise thing to make a smooth transition with what the mp3 has below 16khz and goes up to 40khz!!!! the thing is, the marketing on this DAP is full of crap.
here are but a few examples:
-pretend like they care for the ultimate sound with the lowest noise floor, so they went high res and use whatever chipset to show us the noise floor is lower. but they didn't do a thing for the amp section that was already the noisy part on old walkmans. the A10 has one of the highest noise floor on a sony.
-shows the step ladder graph BS to explain what high res brings in resolution, when nothing in a modern DAP resembles the step ladder graph stuff. it's the most used graph by people totally ignorant of how modern DACs work.
-dsee should bring the file closer to the original, but on some songs you can hear a clear difference ON and OFF. so why do I fail an abx between flac 24/96 and mp3@320 of the same song?
as I said I really love that DAP, but make yourself a favor and don't trust anything sony marketing is saying about that product. they obviously know even less than we do.
to me dsee is just another DSP that changes the sound, some will not notice, some will like it, some will not. but remember that it's eating 30 or 40% more battery and does not increase fidelity.
the choice to use the dac part inside the sony or on something else follows no universal rule of improvement. you just replace one DAC by another one, so just like for the amp section, the question is to decide which one is better?
the clearbass is pretty much the same from those 2 models, and the magnitude was pretty similar too(almost 10db boost at max level). I use mostly hf5 and mc5 on this DAP and it becomes OKish with clearbass ^_^.
if you're not afraid of the larger shape of the dynamic driver etys, I advise you to try one of the cheapo ones they now have. they aren't as good as the hf5 dead flat in treble extention(and far from the er4), but they sound super duper clean and they respond much better to EQ than the ETYs with BA drivers. so you end up with better bass using clearbass IMO. also even my mc5 is a good deal less sensitive so you don't really notice the hiss that you can perceive if you pay attention with the hf5. and of course the impedance is dead flat so the 4ohm output is a non issue. (I suggest that because those IEMs are around 50$ for most of them, so it's not a huge leap of faith to take and they still have the massive isolation).
for some strange reason, buying the player here in Chile instead of abroad is actually cheaper for a change - about US$239
Here In mexico the A17 costed me more, $399 USD, but same as you i am so happy with it, sounds so awesome, a superb upgrade from the trstworthy fiio x3
Here in Singapore the a17 cost only 280 xD
the choice to use the dac part inside the sony or on something else follows no universal rule of improvement. you just replace one DAC by another one, so just like for the amp section, the question is to decide which one is better?
I don't understand the logic in using a dac/amp instead of LOD-amp for a DAP. I mean, is there really that much of a difference between A17 and a $2000 DAP as far as their on board DAC is concerned?
the clearbass is pretty much the same from those 2 models, and the magnitude was pretty similar too(almost 10db boost at max level). I use mostly hf5 and mc5 on this DAP and it becomes OKish with clearbass ^_^.
if you're not afraid of the larger shape of the dynamic driver etys, I advise you to try one of the cheapo ones they now have. they aren't as good as the hf5 dead flat in treble extention(and far from the er4), but they sound super duper clean and they respond much better to EQ than the ETYs with BA drivers. so you end up with better bass using clearbass IMO. also even my mc5 is a good deal less sensitive so you don't really notice the hiss that you can perceive if you pay attention with the hf5. and of course the impedance is dead flat so the 4ohm output is a non issue. (I suggest that because those IEMs are around 50$ for most of them, so it's not a huge leap of faith to take and they still have the massive isolation).
You were spot on. I bought the A17 last Friday and I'm very, very happy with it. Also, for some strange reason, buying the player here in Chile instead of abroad is actually cheaper for a change - about US$239 according to Google. I had a hard time deciding between the MC5 and the HF5, and I recall reading comments similar to yours regarding EQ response. I might take the plunge eventually, but for now I'm good. Thank you!
any links to it ? a15 is 299 and a17 is 399 from sony.sg website.