- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Posts
- 28,349
- Likes
- 32,184
Go for PHA 3 if you still want to stay with Sony
Thanks for prompt reply.
The reason I am thinking of Vorzuge Pure II+ is ; I found a second hand one used only for about 20 hours with a very attractive price, 1/3 of PHA 3.
I am sure it is in very good condition, however I do not have the chance to try and test the sound. (the seller is in another town)
Although my OPPO PM2s are very efficient headphones, I think an amp will help low end and high tones and improve detail.
PHA 3 is looks very bulky and heavy.
I want to get an amp transparent as possible, since I like sound character of XZ very much.
Thanks and Regards
Just sold my PHA 3 and bought a Chord Mojo. Couldn't be happier. I had the opportunity to listen to both extensively, on my JH13 Pro custom IEMS, Audeze LCD 2.2 on-ears, as well as my home audio setup as stand-alone DACs, and the Mojo beats the PHA3 in the areas of sound staging, clarity, low and high frequency separation and reach. It was not a close call. I do miss the balanced connectors of the PHA3, but as noted by Rob Watts, the designer of the Mojo:
[COLOR=000000]Q. Why doesn't the Mojo have balanced output?[/COLOR]
[COLOR=000000]"For the best performance for the design, a single-ended output is best. A balanced output would require double the circuitry and would reduce the objective performance, not increase it. The Mojo can output 5V, which is more than enough to generate up to 120 dB of sound cleanly into most headphones."[/COLOR]
I could see myself being happy with the PHA3, plugged into the sources and components I have. A second, extended listening to the Mojo changed that. I'd urge anyone contemplating purchasing a PHA3 to audition the Chord Mojo as well.
Just to reflect, there are 77 pages of discussions on the dedicated PHA3 thread that had its beginnings in March 2014. In comparison, there are 1100 pages of buzz on the Chord Mojo that began 19 months later, in October 2015. I've never seen a head-fi product generate so much discussion (mostly positive) by so many people in so short a time.
i am back to the gonemad player , after using extensively the poweramp alpha version
seems to be cleanest and flattest as a player
I have a Mojo, but since my main OTG headphones these days are the KSE1500, I usually leave it at home. I haven't found a good way to stack it with the KSE DAC and the Sony. I love the long battery life of the ZX2 in analog out mode vs USB.
I haven't had time to keep up with the Mojo thread. Is it better than the Hugo? I ask because I use Hugo at home.
I personally tried Mojo, and to my preferences, it was no comparison to the PHA-3 with balanced connection, period. Single ended and the Mojo had some good energies and dynamic in it VS the PHA-3.
The one thing for sure is that the PHA-3 needs more than 200 hours to mature and age. My PHA-3 had been burning in for 110 hours, and now the bass, sub bass and dynamic fidelity had been improved dramatically from me using the line out and or headphones compares to when it was 10-15 hours. IMO, Mojo has not this level of separation, and spherical soundstage as the PHA-3 in balanced. Mojo only has better design, power, and single ended connection.
It is understandable when people rather buy Mojo when they don't need balanced connections, or deem balanced is not needed to their own personal preferences. I had went through enough to say that properly configured balanced connection is the best for me and my interests. Both of Sony Zx2, PHA-3 has it
And you sir, I see what you did there. Awesome looking, perfect solution for the Zx2 on the go for days....and I am looking at your avatar. Congratulations
Mojo is warmer and better for me. They say separation is better for Hugo but mojo has newer improved innards and so far it's very addictive. For times I don't have it paired w the zx2, I use balanced cables but there's a sharp crisp distinction of notes no dap can match mojo yet. Add silver cables and you won't look for anything else for maybe another year or so haha (haven't we heard this before?)