- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Posts
- 3,415
- Likes
- 868
I agree but then again I am not a fan of EE LX (or Phantom). Both are too thick sounding and overtly warm for me, I think it's bass bleeds too much across the spectrum, it becomes overwhelming and feels stuffy. Z1R on the other hand is a crystal clear sound. Clean bass and quite airy/holographic overall. Stage size and treble sparkle are much superior in comparison. Overall Z1R seems more refined and higher fidelity. I can see why folks like the LX, it is fun for specific genres (e.g. electronic) but personally I prefer a more balanced transparent signature.
Totally agree with you for the above description. Those are what I call specialties iems that also include the Campfire Vega/Atlas line of iems. I posted in the Jomo thread this morning about the same descriptions that you wrote above regarding the Trinity. Everything you said about the Z1R above can be applied to the Trinity with one to two level above the Z1R.
Here is what I said "the piano has that life like sparkle with decay, Cello is tight and defined. Sound Patriot said it good the tuning is very coherent and balance, every elements of the sound profile do not stand out or over take the overall profile unless they are called for by the music. What I mean is for instance the Campfire Vega or Atlas, they are both bass heavy iems regardless of what music you listen to, the Andromeda is the opposite of the Vega/Atlas. Even the Sony's Z1R has that sound character but with the Trinity sound is much more independently presented but in a coherent manner. This is with the brass version. I have not listened to the SS version and I worry that any more cleaner, brighter will alter the above impression and making it like the better version of the Andromeda"