Quote:
Originally Posted by psikey /img/forum/go_quote.gif
My listening trial with Shure SE530's
New Nano sounds better than the 80/160GB Classic and the new Touch sounds better than both.
The new Touch has no (or very little) noise, wider more open sound stage and better bass.
I've used or tried other apple, Walkman & creative players and the new Touch with no EQ sounds better than any of them to my ears with the 530's (don't normally use EQ or like excessive bass).
Well pleased with my 32GB 2nd gen Touch
Also, with as supplied firmware on the Touch I've had no problem connecting to my works WPA-PSK encrypted wireless.
|
So, in SQ, Classic [80/160]< Nano 4G< Touch 2G?
Wow, touch must have improved a lot!
I bought one but then I returned it because it hissed and it sounded horrible
I'm not really interested in the touch because I own an iPhone, but could you tell me if the touch sounds WAYY better then the nano or if it's only just a small, tiny difference you wouldn't mind...?
Also, I have a Walkman NWZ-A726, and I've done that little DAC setting tweak
and I use it with the Custom EQ of +2, +2, +1, 0, +2, +1.
I'm sorry if I'm bothering you, but does the nano sound better than the walkman?
If you have a different Walkman could you just tell me your opinion just based on your walkman?
Or if it's not better, how much worse does it sound? Because the classic I have sounds worse than the Walkman..
I'm definitely going to get a nano soon, since I just don't have enough money right now..
And it's driving me crazy and making me curious. I'm so looking forward to getting one!