Uncle Erik
Uncle Exotic
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2006
- Posts
- 22,596
- Likes
- 532
CoryGillmore, the transactions here are generally very good. The bad ones blow up in angry threads, but that's a very small minority of the transactions.
C.O.D.
I will only contribute this:
source: www.xkcd.com
What are the pros and cons of sending a payment as gift via PayPal? It seems all FS listings prefer this despite my preference to record the transaction as a payment of goods. The excuse that gifting doesn't attract fees doesn't make sense, as a recent payment I sent through as a gift at the buyer's request attracted a fee that I still had to cough up. Why does it matter to the seller that the transaction is a gift if the amount that clears is the requested amount anyway? Seems like a double shafting of the buyer.
I like the idea of having a trusted third party hold funds for a buyer until that buyer can confirm receipt of goods. Although it sort of falls apart when sellers send items fraudulently with shipping confirmation and tracking. If the buyer has a grievance because the item received was not as described, it'd be for the third party to determine if the buyer is refunded or if payment is forwarded to the seller. Who would want to assume that responsibility?
I think a buy it now eBay listing would be a viable option with some sense of security. In this instance a seller lists the item using a unique heading to prevent other buyers snapping up the item. The seller has detailed item description within the listing to reduce the chance of buyer charge back claim. If there is a dispute, an avenue is available for either party.
No it doesn't. I sent a "gift" 3 days ago at the seller's insistence. The fee was $13.64USD and it gave me the option of paying the fee or forwarding it to the recipient. Like I said, if I'm paying the fee anyway why do buyers insist on gifting, when I'd prefer to record the transaction as a payment of goods? It's fishy.