All of which I agree with, except for the bit about ‘veil’ which is not something that I’ve ever found my later HD650’s to be (perhaps the first pre silver screen ones where?), but specifically, do you find the HD660S brighter or darker that the HD650 in the treble (in other words, does the HD660S have more or less treble presence compared to the other frequencies than the HD650)? The reason I ask is that I consistently find there to be less, which is what many of the FR graphs show (including the one from DIY-A-H) but I had always previously had the impression that the consensus of opinion was that the HD660S was a brighter sounding headphone with more treble presence.
I’m just trying to understand why it is that that is not what I’m hearing, nor is it what the graphs show, yet it seems to be the general impression. Of course the FR graph from SW did show more high frequency presence and they criticised it for being too bright for critical listening. That’s certainly not true of mine.
I think the reason many find the HD 660 S brighter is due to its stronger overall midrange presence than the HD 650, since the midrange is one of the most sensitive parts of our hearing it doesn’t surprise me more can come off as brighter. The HD 650 does have more treble presence in my experience but the HD 660 S came off as brighter due to a stronger midrange and less bass warmth, despite its highs being more muted than the HD 650. But it has been a while since I heard them side by side, so take what I say with a grain of salt.
I did decide to get the HD 650 again, or rather the HD 6XX, which is the same thing. I also plan on getting the HD 660 S again, which I ended up giving to a friend, but I’m waiting for the design refresh to become available here in the US before I do. While I do fall more in the Beyer camp, I realized having one or two of the HD 6 family headphones in my stable is always worthwhile and I always miss them some even though I have headphones I like more.
Last edited: