Sennheiser HD 650 sounds muffled
Jul 26, 2010 at 12:59 PM Post #46 of 56


Quote:
For what its worth... the lower the volume, the more bass and treble is needed to sound flat.  The Senn 650 is not flat at low levels.  The Grado GS1000 is but sounds terrible at moderate volume or higher.


Fletcher Munson curves support your point. And yeah the 650 are much much better at high volume listening, the main reason why I didn't have them as my favorite headphones for much time, even though I like them a lot.
 
Jul 26, 2010 at 1:14 PM Post #47 of 56
 
Okay you caught me out.  I don't find the HD650 treble rolled - off at any volume outright - but relative to other cans?  One must acknowledge the differences in opinion and consolidate somehow in order to, y'know - keep the peace.  Cheers.


The HD650 is laid back.  I never found it dull or dark, just not edgy in its treble.  Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing is subjective.  One good thing about it is that you could crank it fairly high without ear fatigue, though I sometimes had sessions where I wondered if I hadn't gone too far.  "Veiled" is a controversial tag since one person's veil is another's common sense.
 
I had an issue with a GS1000.  I had just gotten it and it bugged me how sibilant is sounded, especially on certain 80s tracks which seemed a little sweet to begin with.  In retrospect, I realize now that the problem was in thinking it would drive just fine without an amp.  The jumbo cushions had increased the ear/driver distance while their wider aperture had widened HF dispersion and extended it.  In short, there was this tonal shift that felt excessive.  I didn't realize that without more power and more air flow, there was no way the bass could catch up with that extra treble.  I ended up blaming the problem on the pads, which I eventually sliced back a few millimeters until the sibilance went away.  (When I got my amp, I realized I never needed to snip the pads to fix the tonal balance.)
 
It was while banging my head against the wall on this issue that I came to realize the obvious: sibilance is just too much treble.  It's an issue of tonal balance.  One reason the plastic Grados use smaller cushions is to retain a certain tonal balance.  Plastic isn't the world's greatest material from which to construct an air chamber, so the lower Prestige cans use the smaller cushions to keep the ear close and even filter the HF (comfies are "veiled" while un-modded flats can feel muted).  If the point is to maintain a certain tonal balance, there's a logic to maintaining that balance on both sides.  If the bass is not getting much help from the air chambers, it's not a good idea to open up the HF any further than necessary.  Not surprisingly, the iGrados are the most veiled of the Grados, followed by the SR60.  As you go up the Grado tree, more is done to increase the efficiency of the air chambers (through better screens, larger chambers and better wiring). As the effectiveness of the air chambers improves, the comfies are replaced by bowls.  The SR325 is probably the most controversial, with its love/hate divide between those who love its edgy sparkle and those who find it too bright.  An easy fix for that is to switch to flats, but the whole controversy comes from that balancing issue.  The RS1 isn't any less sparkly but it brings into play mahogany air chambers.  The wood balances out the sparkle.  When Grado reached for the jumbo pads, he had to balance the out with huge hammer-head mushroom cups.  Even so, this appears to be the moment when, for my money, Grados finally needed the benefit of a strong amp.
 
I bring this up because the HD650's "veil" may be common sense at work.  The HD650 has as big a mouth as the GS1000.  If memory serves, it digs lower than the GS1000 using the Sennheiser strategy of filtering the treble.  In fact, all of the wide-mouthed circumaurals - including the K701, the HD800, the HD600/650 and the T1 - use some form of filtering to restrain the treble.  I'm not sure what the big difference is between the HD600 and the HD650 but they use different drivers.  Maybe there's a difference in the thickness of the diaphragm or the cushions used to attenuate the treble.  Whatever the case, the HD600 and HD650 seem like pretty close cans, except that the 650 has better bass extension while the 600 has the greater HF extension.  The HD800 seems to have split the difference, but at quite a hike in price.  I can easily see putting some money into the cabling and/or the amp to avoid having to shell out the extra freight.
 
I own an HD800, which is a marvelous set of cans, but it's hard not to look wistfully back at what the HD650 did - for one-sixth the price (I bought my HD650 used).  Still, I missed the edgy treble of the Grado.  Having owned the PS1000, the HD800 and the T1, I'm convinced that they're all trying to claim the same real estate.  They're just reaching for it from different directions.
 
 
Jul 26, 2010 at 2:06 PM Post #48 of 56
Give you ears sometime to get adjusted. Coming from K501/K271S, I hated 650 at first too. Now I've had the senn for 7 years... and it's probably the last phones i'll let go. Changing amp/dac wont change it's character dramatically. If you can't get adjusted after one or two weeks of exclusive use, sell it. 
 
Jul 26, 2010 at 5:56 PM Post #50 of 56
SP Wild wrote:
 
I don't find the HD650 treble rolled - off at any volume outright - but relative to other cans?
 
I'll have to go with your opinion as I can't afford to buy and try, all what the headphone market has to offer.
 
Boo, Hoo, Hoo.
 
Solude
 
For what its worth... the lower the volume, the more bass and treble is needed to sound flat.
 
Explains the need to EQ the Bass and the Mid-Highs.  I'd be afraid of damaging my hearing keeping the volume at a level which seems to give a full figured response.
 
beerchug.gif

 
Aug 2, 2010 at 2:51 AM Post #51 of 56
1. Did you buy it used?  When was it manufactured?  Sometime in about 2007, they changed the sound.  About that time--and generally thought to be the cause--they removed the soft black silk in the oval area surrounding the driver as seen from the outside grille, replacing it with an aluminum-looking fine mesh in a large oval shape.  Take a look.  The older is dark and veiled with some hangover in the bass.  The newer is tighter and flatter while remaining musically right.  
 
This headphone is perhaps a tad dark of neutral, but a large majority of headphones seem to have peaky and/or raised treble response.  Some think of this as "alive," "detailed," and "transparent."  I find it destroys voices and causes fatiguing glare, or sibilance, or splash, or edge... or all.  
 
Try aftermarket cables if it is a new model and if you find a source/amp combo that get it close to singing as you wish it to.  
 
 
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f4/sennheiser-changed-construction-hd650-pictures-230845
 
Mar 28, 2021 at 7:19 PM Post #52 of 56
I'd blame it mostly on the amp in the soundcard that you're using. I think you're suffering from the infamous "Sennheiser Veil," which is *not* a fault of the headphones. This has been debated at length here, but the bottom line is that the HD-650 does not sound muffled (or "Veiled") when run on an appropriate amplifier. The conclusion to draw is that some amps are veiled and some are not.

There are a number of excellent amplifiers that bring out the best of the HD-650 at a variety of price points. If you can give us an idea as to your budget, we can give you a lot of recommendations for a good amp.

And yes, when the HD-650 is amped correctly, it will not sound muffled at all. The mids and highs will be excellent, as well. The HD-650 is one of the best on the market - wait until you hear what it is capable of.
I am using the HD650 on my Lotoo Paw Gold 2017. I did a little research online about parametric equalizer settings for this headphone, and now it is my favorite headphone out of this digital audio player. The high frequency is crisp, extends well, and it's realistic. There is absolutely no veil and the bass is juicy and tight.
 

Attachments

  • 0328210817b_HDR.jpg
    0328210817b_HDR.jpg
    956.6 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Mar 28, 2021 at 7:33 PM Post #53 of 56
I know buying headphones without trying first is stupid, but I got a good offer, so I could not resist... My other headphone is an old AKG K66. When I first tried it, I was prepared to experience something better, but the sound of the 650 really disappointed me. Compared to the K66, the Sennheiser sounds muffled, the highs are completely missing for me. I'm using the output of an old Soundblaster Live! soundcard. I know all about 650 having a higher (300Ohm) impedance.. etc., so I'm ready to purchase a headphone amp, but I'm affraid it will only increase the bass, not the highs. Should I give another chance to the 650 by buying better equipment, or does this mean it is simly not the headphone for me.
I literally hated these headphones when I first got them. Now that I have figured out the proper parametric equalizer setting for my LPG 2017, and now that the headphones and the player are both burned in, they're one of my favorite headphones. I have heard the Meze Empyrean, so that is saying a lot. When I had these very high-end headphones for a demo, I kept wanting to go back to the hd650 and the Shure srh1540. This is all about sound preferences, but there is certainly no veil on these. My rule is that I will not be tied to a desk though, nor will I stack. I am 100% fully portable audio or bust.
 
Last edited:
Mar 28, 2021 at 8:28 PM Post #54 of 56
The HD650, for me, is simply a wonderfully warm, cosy and intimate pair of headphones. The treble isn't force-fed into your head like other headphones, which might give the sense of 'muffling' - the detail is all in there, it's just like having three glasses of red wine and sitting back in a nice chair.
 
Mar 30, 2021 at 12:02 AM Post #55 of 56
Look, this thread had zero activity for close to 11 years. Let it go. Some people consider it veiled, some do not.

Edit: I'm more curious as to how you found a thread over a decade old with no activity?!
 
Last edited:
Mar 30, 2021 at 7:35 AM Post #56 of 56
Also have my pair of 650 now for a bit. I'm lucky enough to found one that was a very early version made in Ireland.

At first i thought it sounded really muffled too but the longer i used it the more i liked it. Now it's the most musical headphone i've ever had and the least expensive endgame i ever had.

It's also quite more detailed than you think first. It makes all other headphones sound like they're artificially treble boosted to appear more detailed sounding.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top