LazyListener
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2015
- Posts
- 924
- Likes
- 300
Testing methodologies among testers/reviewers are not all the same, especially when it comes to the target/correction curve (theoretical flat). It's more important to compare frequencies levels relative to each other within a graph, rather than graphs from different testers/websites. For example, that graph you posted shows that the bass is elevated and there's a bit of a treble spike around 10kHz compared with the midrange frequencies. The rtings graph I posted also shows this and I did say the low mids are elevated. But both rtings.com and innerfidelity.com graphs for 598 show a slight v-shaped signature with bass and treble slightly elevated compared to the middle frequencies. Also, anything above about 10kHz is going to be all over the place on any FR chart. The difference between 10kHz and 20kHz are in reality is very small, so there the variations are magnified. If you were to take any portion of the FR range and zoom in on it to see it on a finer scale, you would see similar variations (it wouldn't look as smooth). A lot of the sound information above 10kHZ is not of much value, both in terms of testing and hearing.It's Mid-centric according to this: https://www.innerfidelity.com/images/SennheiserHD598.pdf
But I could be reading it wrong.
Now for comparison, take a look at the HD 650 graph from the same website you linked. https://www.innerfidelity.com/images/SennheiserHD650.pdf Zoom in on both the 598 graph and the 650 graph and compare the 2. You will see that the 650 graph is a bit closer to flat line, with more of a treble roll off, than the 598.
Neither headphone is mid-centric. The 598 is slightly v-shaped (don't take "V" literally, it just means mids are recessed compared to bass/treble). The 650 is closer to flat than 598. This is how I heard them as well.