DarknightDK
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2011
- Posts
- 665
- Likes
- 27
Thanks for sharing your impressions. They are certainly very helpful.
BUT we all agreed that for the price, the Mjolnir is a superb bargain and tremendous value. The Bryston retail price is now nearly twice the selling price of the Mjolnir.
Still, we are all curious what an other hundred of hours could do to the Mjolnir. rattesp offer me to land me the Mjolnir for a couple of days in my home set-up in a near future to have the time to do a lenghty comparaison of both amp. I certainly will accept his offer.
All the participants recognized that the fisrt attempt of Bryston in the headphone market was a really successful one.
By no means I wanted to step on anybody's toes here. I just want to share my experience (others here had the opposite opinion when they compared both amps) and let people know that there is other alternatives in SS amps (yet more pricey).
Stay updated on Audio-Technica at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
I continue to believe you need at least 200 hours on a piece of gear before you really listen to it critically. It just seems to make a significant difference.
I had nothing to compare it to (b22 doesnt count because it's very different).
Care to explain why you think these two Solid States amp can't be compared?
IMHO any thing can be compared - at the end of the day what your comparing is the sound - not the difference in the technical aspects.
Ask Solude - He compares anything and everything that produces sound. I respected him for that.
Also he had the M and put his own hours on it. Might not change much more that what you have.
Stay updated on Audio-Technica at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
I was specifically comparing the bha-1/mjolnir because they have a "similar" sound, basically two amps I was deciding upon. The b22 if I was to compare, is more grandiose, sort-of a mix between an ss and tube amp with bloomy-er bass and more musical (harmonics and fuller sound). It's a better match with the HD-800, but not sure about the HE-6.
Also, the mjolnir we were trying was the one bought from Solude by Rattesp
My B22 is a 3-channel build. I also prefer the bass on the B22. It doesn't have the slam and the impact of the BHA-1 bass but it has a lot more "texture" and details IMHO. The fact that it doesn't have the same impact may give the impression that it's bloomy-er ?
Just got back for the fantastic UK meet when I had the opportunity to try the Mjolnir with my HE-6. The amp sounded great, amazing bass and details and very energetic but I also noticed a slight edginess and thinness in the treble.
Just got back for the fantastic UK meet when I had the opportunity to try the Mjolnir with my HE-6. The amp sounded great, amazing bass and details and very energetic but I also noticed a slight edginess and thinness in the treble.