Quote:
Sorry my Andriod tablett doesn't show signatures for some reason. I have a Lite Dac 83, they are very good with right tube. In my office I also have a Xindak DAC5, which uses the 6dj8 as well. For $500 used a real bargain in DACland. With the '75 Gray shield 6n23p Voskhod it gets within spitting distance of the big APL DAC. That says alot! Uses the AD1852. Like Lite Dac83 got 4of5 stars on the Darko Dac index. I bet both reviewed with stock tubes.
Just went through a bunch tube rolling on the Xindak...the single wire getter post Silver Shield '74 Refektors were really good to. These differ from the double dimpled getter support Reflectors.
How does the Bifrost compare to the Lite?
No problem on the sig. Wow, nice DAC inventory there!
The DAC60 is great with good tubes. I ran the National 6922s in it for quite a while, but give a slight edge to the Voskhods in the DAC. My DAC60 started life as a GR-Research modified unit, which replaced the output caps with a combo of Sonicaps and Sonicap Platinums, and more caps replacements around the 1704 power supply (Black Gates, Oscons, Elna Silmic).
I further modified the power supply with choke regulation (as oppsosed to a single resistor) and BHC Aerovox power supply capacitors. Also added teflon-silver input wire. It sounds very, very good. Very non-fatiguing, huge soundstage and lifelike tone. Somewhat rolled off in the treble, bass a little round, but glorious mids (tubes, tubes, tubes). I am also a big fan of the PCM1704.
The Bifrost is another beast altogether. Much lower self-noise, better detail retrieval, but still quite smooth and inviting. Better balance overall than the DAC60, tighter bass and extended treble. The DAC60 displays 'better' mids. The Bifrost's soundstage is not as large, and reproduction of string-based acoustic is not quite as 'live' sounding. That said, I love the Bifrost, and think it's the best combo of price/performance of anything I ever purchased; my AKG 702 Annies are a close second.
-